Regionalisation of Climate Change sensitive forest development types for potential afforestation areas

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 127, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Witt, Anke ^a   Fürst, Christine ^b   Frank, Susanne ^a   Koschke, Lars ^a   Makeschin, Franz ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Climate Change; Forest development types; Forest management planning; GISCAME; Potential afforestation areas; Regionalisation

Indexed keywords

WATER;

AFFORESTATION; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE EFFECT; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; FOREST MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; MAPPING; REGIONALIZATION; SILVICULTURE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; WATER EROSION;

AFFORESTATION; ARTICLE; CLIMATE CHANGE; DROUGHT; EROSION; FOREST MANAGEMENT; FORESTRY; GEOGRAPHIC MAPPING; GERMANY; NUTRIENT; REGIONALIZATION; SOIL; TREE;

GERMANY; SAXONY;

CLIMATE CHANGE; FOREST DEVELOPMENT TYPES; FOREST MANAGEMENT PLANNING; GISCAME; POTENTIAL AFFORESTATION AREAS; REGIONALISATION;

CLIMATE CHANGE; FORESTRY;

EID: 84881667019     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.007     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Badoux A., Witzig J., Germann P.F., Kienholz H., Lüscher P., Weingartner R., Hegg C. Investigations on the runoff generation at the profile and plot scales, Swiss Emmental. Hydrological Processes 2006, 20:377-394.
2. Burrough P.A. Fuzzy mathematical methods for soil survey and land evaluation. Journal of Soil Science 1989, 40:477-492.
3. Coops, N.C., Gallant, J.C., Loughhead, A.N., Mackey, B.J., Ryan, P.J., Mullen, I.C., Austin, M.P., 1998. Developing and Testing Procedures to Predict Topographic Position from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) for Species Mapping (Phase 1). Report to Environment Australia. Client Report No. 271, p. 56.
4. D'Amato A.W., Bradford J.B., Fraver S., Palik B.J. Forest management for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: Insights from long-term silviculture experiments. Forest Ecology and Management 2011, 262:803-816.
5. Eisenhauer D., Roch T., Irrgang S., Sonnemann S.,R.,G. Bestandeszieltypen - Richtlinie für den Staatswald des Freistaates Sachsen 2005, Freistaat Sachsen, Landesforstpräsidium, p. 56.
6. Eisenhauer D.R., Sonnemann S. Waldentwicklungstypen - Grundlage für die Entwicklung regionaler Waldbaurichtlinien in Sachsen. Forst und Holz 2008, 63(10):12-17.
7. Eisenhauer D.R., Sonnemann S. Silvicultural strategies under changing environmental conditions-guiding principles, target system and forest development types. Forest Ecology, Landscape Research and Nature Conservation 2009, 9:69-84.
8. Ellenberg H., Leuschner C. Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen: In ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht 2010, UTB, Stuttgart, p. 1357.
9. FAO State of the World's Forests 2007 2007, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p. 144.
10. FAO, UNEP, 2008. The UN-REDD Programme Strategy 2011-2015, the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries, p. 22.
11. Frank S., Fürst C., Koschke L., Makeschin F. Acontribution towards a transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecological Indicators 2011, 1-9.
12. Fürst C., König H., Pietzsch K., Ende H., Makeschin F. Pimp your landscape - a generic approach for integrating regional stakeholder needs into land use planning. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(3):1-25.
13. Fürst C., Lorz C., Makeschin F. Integrating land management and land-cover classes to assess impacts of land use change on ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 2011, 168-181.
14. Fürst C., Pietzsch K., Witt A., Frank S., Koschke L., Makeschin F. How to better consider sectoral planning information in regional planning: example afforestation and forest conversion. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2012, 1-29.
15. Fürst C., Volk M., Pietzsch K., Makeschin F. Pimp your landscape: a tool for qualitative evaluation of the effects of regional planning measures on ecosystem services. Environmental Management 2010, 46:953-968.
16. Gemballa R. Ökogramme der Natürlichen Waldgesellschaften und Stamm-Vegetationsformen in Sachsen 2005, Freistaat Sachsen, Landesforstpräsidium, p. 34.
17. GeoSN Mittelmaßstäbige landwirtschaftliche Standortkartierung 1:100 000 (MMK100) 1980, Staatsbetrieb Geobasisinformation und Vermessung Sachsen (GeoSN), Available from:, (accessed 22.02.12.). http://www.landesvermessung.sachsen.de/inhalt/produkte/karten/geol/v-geo l/mmk100.html.
18. GeoSN Digitales Geländemodell ATKIS-DGM 2010, Staatsbetrieb Geobasisinformation und Vermessung Sachsen (GeoSN), Available from:, (accessed 22.02.12.). http://www.landesvermessung.sachsen.de/inhalt/produkte/karten/geol/v-geo l/mmk100.html.
19. Giles P.T., Franklin S.E. An automated approach to the classification of the slope units using digital data. Geomorphology 1998, 21:251-264.
20. IPCC, 2000. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Special Report: Emissions Scenarios. Summary for Policymakers, a Special Report of IPCC Working Group III, p. 20.
21. Jansen M., Judas M., Saborowski J. Spatial Modelling in Forest Ecology and Management: A Case Study 2002, Springer, p. 229.
22. Klingseisen B., Metternicht G., Paulus G. Geomorphometric landscape analysis using a semi-automated GIS-approach. Environmental Modelling & Software 2008, 23:109-121.
23. Kopp D., Schwanecke W. Standörtlich-naturräumliche Grundlagen ökologiegerechter Forstwirtschaft 2003, N. Kessel. second ed.
24. LfULG Bodenkonzeptkarte (BKkonz). Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt 2006, Landwirtschaft und Geologie/Saxonian State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Available from:, (accessed 20.02.12.). http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/boden/11638.htm.
25. LfULG Bodenkarte (BK 50). Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt 2010, Landwirtschaft und Geologie/Saxonian State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology, Available from:, (accessed 20.02.12). http://www.umwelt.sachsen.de/umwelt/boden/11639.htm.
26. Milad M., Schaich H., Bürgi M., Konold W. Climate change and nature conservation in Central European forests: a review of consequences, concepts and challenges. Forest Ecology and Management 2011, 261:829-843.
27. Millar C.I., Stephenson N.L., Stephens S.L. Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 2007, 17:2145-2151.
28. Nelson G.C., Rosegrant M.W., Koo J., Robertson R., Sulser T., Zhu T., Ringler C., Msangi S., Palazzo A., Batka M., Magalhaes M., Valmonte-Santos R., Ewing M., Lee D. Climate Change Impact on Agriculture and Costs of Adaptation 2009, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, p. 19.
29. Norby R., Ogle K., Curtis P., Badeck F.-W., Huth A., Hurtt G., Kohyama T., Peñuelas J. Aboveground growth and competition in forest Gap models: an analysis for studies of climatic change. Climatic Change 2001, 51:415-447.
30. Parry M.L., Rosenzweig C., Iglesias A., Livermore M., Fischer G. Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio-economic scenarios. Global Environmental Change 2004, 14:53-67.
31. Regionaler Planungsverband Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge (Hg.), 2009. Regionalplan Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge, 1. Gesamtfortschreibung 2009 Teil 1, Radebeul, p. 158.
32. Salski A. Fuzzy Logic Approach to Data Analysis and Ecological Modelling. Fuzzy Logic Approach to Data Analysis and Ecological Modelling 1999, University of Kiel, Available from:, (accessed 22.03.12.). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.118.2128%26 rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf.
33. Schlutow A., Gemballa R. Anpassung in Bezug auf den prognostizierten Klimawandel Sachsens Leitwaldgesellschaften. AFZ-Der Wald 2008, 63:28-31.
34. Speight J.G. Aparametric approach to landform regions. Progress in Geomorphology 1974, 213-230. Alden Press.
35. Spiecker, H., Hansen, J., von Teuffel, K., 2003. The Question of Conversion of Coniferous Forests, Freiburg, p. 85.
36. Vasechko G.I. An ecological approach to forest protection. Forest Ecology and Management 1983, 5:133-168.
37. Wahren A., Schwärzel K., Feger K.H., Münch A., Dittrich I. Identification and model based assessment of the potential water retention caused by land-use changes. Advances in Geosciences 2007, 11:49-56.
38. Wullschleger S., Jackson R., Currie W., Friend A., Luo Y., Mouillot F., Pan Y., Shao G. Below-ground processes in gap models for simulating forest response to global change. Climatic Change 2001, 51:449-473.
39. Zirlewagen D., Raben G., Weise M. Zoning of forest health conditions based on a set of soil, topographic and vegetation parameters. Forest Ecology and Management 2007, 248:43-55.
40. Zirlewagen D., von Wilpert K. Using model scenarios to predict and evaluate forest-management impacts on soil base saturation at landscape level. European Journal of Forest Research 2004, 123:269-282.