How to better consider sectoral planning information in regional planning: Example afforestation and forest conversion

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 855-883

  Fürst, Christine ^a   Pietzsch, Katrin ^b   Witt, Anke ^a   Frank, Susanne ^a   Koschke, Lars ^a   Makeschin, Franz ^a  

^a DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

^b PISOLUTION Pietzsch IT Service   (Germany)

Author keywords

2 D cellular automaton; afforestation and conversion scenarios; ecosystem services; impact assessment; regional planning

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK; AFFORESTATION; BIOTOPE; CELLULAR AUTOMATON; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; REGIONAL PLANNING; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 84865051494     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2011.630067     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Anonymous. 2004a. Waldfunktionenkartierung-Grundsätze und Verfahren zur Erfassung der besonderen Schutz- und Erholungsfunktionen des Waldes im Freistaat Sachsen [online]. Sächsisches Ministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft. Available from: www.smul.sachsen.de/sbs/download/WFK.pdf [Accessed 20 January 2011]
2. Anonymous. 2004b. Raumordnung und Landesentwicklung in Sachsen [online] Sächsisches Staatsministerium des Innern. Available from: www.landesentwicklung.sachsen.de/2386.htm [Accessed 21 December 2010]
3. Anonymous. 2005. Richtlinie zu den Bestandeszieltypen (BZT) für den Staatswald des Freistaates Sachsen [online] Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft. Available from: www.forsten.sachsen.de/wald/249.htm [Accessed 17 January 2011]
4. ARL (Akademie für Raumordnung und Landesplanung)Handwörterbuch der Raumordnung 2005
5. Burkhard, B. 2009. Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services-a concept for land cover based assessments. Landscape online, 15: 1-22.
6. Buttoud, G. 2000. How can policy take into consideration the 'full value' of forests?. Land use policy, 17(3): 169-175.
7. Cochinos, R. 2000. Introduction to the theory of cellular automata and one-dimensional traffic simulation [online]. Available from: www.theory.org/complexity/traffic/ [Accessed 6 June 2011]
8. Costanza, R. 2008. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biological conservation, 141(2): 350-352.
9. Costanza, R. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630): 253-260.
10. Daily, G. C. 1997. The potential impacts of global warming on managed and natural ecosystems: implications for human well-being. Abstracts of papers of the American Chemical Society, 213(1-3): 12
11. Dale, V. H. and Polasky, S. 2007. Measures of the effects of agricultural practices on ecosystem services. Ecological economics, 64: 286-296.
12. de Groot, R. S. 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological complexity, 7(3): 260-272.
13. Dilek, E. R., Sahin, S. and Yilmazer, I. 2008. Afforestation areas defined by GIS in Gölbaşi specially protected area Ankara/Turkey. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 144(1-3): 251-259.
14. Eisenhauer, D. R. and Sonnemann, S. 2009. Silvicultural strategies under changing environmental conditions-guiding principles, target system and forest development types. Forest ecology, landscape research and nature conservation, 9: 69-84.
15. EVALSED. 2003. Delphi method. The resource for the evaluation of socio-economic development. SOURCEBOOK 2: Methods & Techniques, [online], DG Regional Policy. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/sources/docgener/evaluation/evalsed/sourcebooks/method_techniques/collecting_information/delphi_survey/index_en.htm [Accessed 1 June 2011]
16. Fisher, B. and Turner, R. K. 2008. Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biological conservation, 141: 1167-1169.
17. Frank, S. forthcoming. Towards the transfer of the ecosystem service concept to landscape planning using landscape metrics. Ecological indicators, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.027
18. Frank, S. A regionally adaptable approach of landscape assessment using landscape metrics within the 2D cellular automaton 'Pimp your landscape'. Proceedings of the IUFRO conference Forest landscape and global change, new frontiers in management, conservation and restoration. Edited by: Azevedo, J. C., Feliciano, M., Castro, J. and Pinto, M. A. pp.36-41.
19. Fürst, C. 2007. Meeting the challenges of process-oriented forest management. Forest ecology and management, 248(1-2): 1-5.
20. Fürst, D. and Ritter, E. H. 1993. Landesentwicklungsplanung und Regionalplanung. Ein verwaltungswissenschaftlicher Grundriß. 2 Aufl. Werner Düsseldorf
21. Fürst, C., Lorz, C. and Makeschin, F. forthcoming. Integrating land management and land cover classes to assess impacts of land use change on ecosystem services. International journal of biodiversity science, ecosystem services & management, DOI: 10.1080/21513732. 2011.611119
22. Fürst, C. 2010a. Pimp your landscape-a generic approach for integrating regional stakeholder needs into land use planning [online]. Ecology and society, 15(3): 34 Available from: www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss3/art34/ [Accessed 15 December 2010]
23. Fürst, C. 2010b. Pimp your landscape: a tool for qualitative evaluation of the effects of regional planning measures on ecosystem services. Environmental Management, 46(6): 894-907.
24. Grabaum, R. and Meyer, B. C. 1998. Multicriteria optimization of landscapes using GIS-based functional assessments. Landscape and urban planning, 43(1-3): 21-34.
25. Hanspach, D. and Porada, H.Th. 2009. Großenhainer Pflege, Werte der Deutschen Heimat-Landschaften in Deutschland Köln: Böhlau Publisher
26. Holzkämper, A. and Seppelt, R. 2007. A generic tool for optimizing land use patterns and landscape structures. Environmental modelling & software, 22: 1801-1804.
27. Kopp, D. and Schwanecke, W. 2003. Standörtlich-naturräumliche Grundlagen ökologiegerechter Forstwirtschaft, Remagen-Oberwinter: Kessel Publisher.
28. Koschke, L. Using a multi-criteria approach to fit the evaluation basis of the modified 2-D cellular automaton Pimp your landscape. Proceedings IUFRO conference Forest landscape and global change, new frontiers in management, conservation and restoration. Edited by: Azevedo, J. C., Feliciano, M., Castro, J. and Pinto, M. A. pp.502-507.
29. Kurttila, M. 2001. The spatial structure of forests in the optimization calculations of forest planning-a landscape ecological perspective. Forest ecology and management, 142(1-3): 129-142.
30. Landsberg, J. and Sands, P. 2011. Modelling tree growth concepts and review. Terrestrial ecology, 4: 221-240.
31. LfULG (Sächsisches Landesamt für Umwelt, Landwirtschaft und Geologie/Saxonian State Office for Environment, Agriculture and Geology). 2010. Klimawandel und Landwirtschaft. Fachliche Grundlage für die Strategie zur Anpassungder sächsischen Landwirtschaft an den Klimawandel
32. Lischke, H. 2006. TreeMig: a forest-landscape model for simulating spatio-temporal patterns from stand to landscape scale. Ecological modelling, 199(4): 409-420
33. Lorz, C., Volk, M. and Schmidt, G. 2007. Considering spatial distribution and functionality of forests in a modeling framework for river basin management. Forest ecology and management, 248(1-2): 17-25.
34. MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis [online], Washington DC: Island Press. Available from: www.millenniumassessment.org/en/index.aspx [Accessed 15 December 2010]
35. Menzel, S. and Teng, J. 2009. Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science. Conservation biology, 24(3): 907-909.
36. Mladenoff, J. D. 2004. LANDIS and forest landscape models. Ecological modelling, 180(1): 7-19.
37. Moreno, N., Wang, F. and Marceau, D. J. 2009. Implementation of a dynamic neighborhood in a land use vector-based cellular automata model. Computers, environment and urban systems, 33(1): 44-54.
38. Ní Dhubháin, Á. 2009. Stakeholders' perceptions of forestry in rural areas-two case studies in Ireland. Land use policy, 26(3): 695-703.
39. Padilla, F. M. 2010. Land use changes and carbon sequestration through the twentieth century in a Mediterranean mountain ecosystem: implications for land-management. Journal of environmental management, 91(12): 2688-2695.
40. Peng, C. 2000. Understanding the role of forest simulation models in sustainable forest management. Environmental impact assessment review, 20(4): 481-501.
41. Perez-Soba, M. 2008. "Land use functions-a multifunctionality approach to assess the impacts of land use change on land use sustainability". In Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes, Edited by: Helming, K., Perez-Soba, M. and Tabbush, P. 375-404. Berlin: Springer.
42. Power, A. 2010. Ecosystem services and agriculture: tradeoffs and synergies. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society London, B. Biological sciences, 365(1554): 2959-2971.
43. Regionaler Planungsverband Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge, 2009. Regionalplan Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge. 1. Gesamtfortschreibung 2009 in der Fassung des Satzungsbeschlusses VV 12/2008 der Verbandsversammlung des Regionalen Planungsverbandes Oberes Elbtal/Osterzgebirge vom 15.12.2008, des Nachtragsbeschlusses zur Satzung VV 02/2009 vom 25.02.2009 und des Genehmigungsbescheides vom 28.08.2009; in Kraft getreten mit der Bekanntmachung nach § 7 Abs. 4 SächsLPlG am 19.11.2009
44. Reza, M. I.H. and Abdullah, S. A. 2011. Regional index of ecological integrity: a need for sustainable management of natural resources. Ecological indicators, 11(2): 220-229.
45. Ring, I. 2010. Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: the TEEB initiative. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 2(1-2): 15-26.
46. Rounsevell, M. D.A. and Reay, D. S. 2009. Land use and climate change in the UK. Land use Policy, 26: 160-169.
47. Silva, E. A., Ahern, J. and Wileden, J. 2008. Strategies for landscape ecology: an application using cellular automata models. Progress in planning, 70(4): 133-177.
48. Soares-Filho, B. S., Coutinho Cerqueira, G. and Lopes Pennachin, C. 2002. Dynamica-a stochastic cellular automata model designed to simulate the landscape dynamics in an Amazonian colonization frontier. Ecological modelling, 154(3): 217-235.
49. Thwaites, R. N. and Slater, R. K. 2000. Soil-landscape resource assessment for plantations-a conceptual framework towards an explicit multi-scale approach. Forest ecology and management, 138(1-3): 123-138.
50. Trabucco, A. 2008. Climate change mitigation through afforestation/reforestation: a global analysis of hydrologic impacts with four case studies. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 126(1-2): 81-97.
51. Vendema, H. D., Calamai, P. H. and Fieguth, P. 2005. Forest structure optimization using evolutionary programming and landscape ecology metrics. European journal of operational research, 164(2): 423-439.
52. Verburg, P. J. 2009. From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. Journal of environmental management, 90(3): 1327-1335.
53. Wattenbach, M. 2007. Hydrological impact assessment of afforestation and change in tree-species composition-a regional case study for the Federal State of Brandenburg (Germany). Journal of hydrology, 346(1-2): 1-17.
54. Weimin, X. 2009. Review of forest landscape models: types, methods, development and applications. Acta ecologica sinica, 29(1): 69-78.
55. Weingarten, P. 2010. Gemeinwohlleistungen der Landwirtschaft und die Gemeinsame Agrarpolitik nach 2013. Agra-Europe, 51(30): 11-12.
56. White, R. and Engelen, G. 1997. Cellular automata as the basis of integrated dynamic regional modelling. Environment and planning B: planning and design, 24: 235-246.
57. Wickramasuriya, R. C. 2009. The dynamics of shifting cultivation captured in an extended Constrained Cellular Automata land use model. Ecological modeling, 220(18): 2302-2309.
58. Wiek, A. and Walter, A. I. 2009. A transdisciplinary approach for formalized integrated planning and decision-making in complex systems. European journal of operational research, 197(1): 360-370.
59. Yang, Q., Li, X. and Shi, X. 2008. Cellular automata for simulating land use changes based on support vector machines. Computers and geosciences, 34(6): 592-602.
60. Zomer, R. J. 2008. Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 126(1-2): 67-80.