Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography-is this correct?

Clinical Oral Investigations

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1785-

  Sabour, Siamak ^a   Dastjerdi, Elahe Vahid ^a   Moezizadeh, Maryam ^a  

^a SHAHID BEHESHTI UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TOOTH IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ANIMAL; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; JAW; ORAL SURGERY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ALVEOLAR PROCESS; ALVEOLAR RIDGE AUGMENTATION; ANIMALS; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTS;

EID: 84881610075     PISSN: 14326981     EISSN: 14363771     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-013-0944-0     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Wang D, Künzel A, Golubovic V, Mihatovic I, John G, Chen Z, Becker J, Schwarz F (2013) Accuracy of peri-implant bone thickness and validity of assessing bone augmentation material using cone beam computed tomography, Clin Oral Investig (in press).
2. Jeckel JF, Katz DL, Elmore JG, Wild DMG (2007) Epidemiology, biostatistics and preventive medicine, 3rd edn. Saunders, Elsevier, Philadelphia.
3. Rothman JK, Greenland S, Lash TL (2008) Modern epidemiology, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore.
4. Szklo M, Nieto FJ (2007) Epidemiology; beyond the basics, 2nd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publisher, Manhattan.
5. Bland JM, Altman DG (2012) Agreed statistics: measurement method comparison. Anesthesiology 116(1): 182-185.