Calculating impacts of exogenous output changes: Application of a social accounting matrix (SAM) model to Alaska fisheries

Annals of Regional Science

Volumn 51, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 553-573

  Seung, Chang K ^a   Waters, Edward C ^b  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Q22; R15

Indexed keywords

DEMAND ANALYSIS; ECONOMETRICS; ECONOMIC IMPACT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PERCIFORM; PINNIPED;

ALASKA; UNITED STATES;

EUMETOPIAS JUBATUS; GADUS MACROCEPHALUS; PLEUROGRAMMUS;

EID: 84881609820     PISSN: 05701864     EISSN: 14320592     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-012-0546-9     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Adelman I, Robinson S (1986) US agriculture in a general equilibrium framework: analysis with a social accounting matrix. Am J Agric Econ 68: 1196-1207.
2. Cai J, Leung P (2004) Linkage measures: a revisit and a suggested alternative. Econ Syst Res 16: 65-85.
3. Dietzenbacher E (1997) In vindication of the Ghosh model: a reinterpretation as a price model. J Reg Sci 37(4): 629-651.
4. Dietzenbacher E (2005) More on multipliers. J Reg Sci 45(2): 421-426.
5. Fernandez-Macho J, Gallastegui C, Gonzalez P (2008) Economic impacts of TAC regulation: a Supply-driven SAM Approach. Fish Res 90: 225-234.
6. Ghosh A (1958) Input-output approach to an allocative system. Economica 25(1): 58-64.
7. Holland D, Wyeth P (1993) SAM multipliers: their decomposition, interpretation, and relationship to input-output multipliers. Research Bulletin XB 1027. College of Agricultural and Home Economics Research Center, Washington State University.
8. King B (1985) What is a SAM? In: Pyatt G, Round J (eds) Social accounting matrix, World Bank, Washington, D. C.
9. Leung P, Pooley S (2002) Regional economic impacts of reductions in fisheries production: a supply-driven approach. Mar Resour Econ 16: 251-262.
10. Lew D, Layton D, Rowe R (2010) Valuing enhancements to endangered species protection under alternative baseline futures: the case of the Steller Sea Lion. Mar Resour Econ 25(2): 133-154.
11. Miller RE, Blair PD (1985) Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
12. Miller RE, Blair PD (2009) Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
13. Minnesota IMPLAN Group, Inc (2004) IMPLAN pro user's guide.
14. National Marine Fisheries Service (2003) Supplement to the endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Statement for October 2001. June 19, 2003. NMFS, Alaska Region, Juneau, AK 99801.
15. National Marine Fisheries Service (2006) Biological assessment of the Alaska Groundfish Fisheries and NMFS managed Endangered Species Act listed marine mammals and sea turtles.
16. National Marine Fisheries Service (2008) Recovery plan for the Steller Sea Lion (Eumetopias jubatus). Revision. March 2008. NMFS, Silver Spring, Maryland, 325 pp. Available: http://alaskafisheries. noaa. gov/protectedresources/stellers/recovery/sslrpfinalrev030408. pdf.
17. National Marine Fisheries Service (2010a) Stock assessment and fishery evaluation report for the Groundfish Fisheries of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea/Aleutian Islands area: economic status of the Groundfish Fisheries off Alaska, 2009. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Economic and Social Sciences Research Program, Resource Ecology and Fisheries Management Division, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, 7600 Sand Point Way N. E., Seattle, WA 98115-6349.
18. National Marine Fisheries Service (2010b) Biological opinion on the Alaska Groundfish Fisheries. National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region, Juneau, Alaska 99802-1668.
19. National Marine Fisheries Service (2010c) Revisions to the Steller Sea Lion Protection Measures for the Aleutian Islands Atka Mackerel and Pacific Cod Fisheries. Council review draft environmental assessment/regulatory impact review. National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region, Juneau, Alaska 99802-1668.
20. National Marine Fisheries Service (2010d) Revisions to the Steller Sea Lion protection measures for the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands Management Area Groundfish Fisheries Environmental Assessment/Regulatory Impact Review. National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region, Juneau, Alaska 99802-1668. http://www. fakr. noaa. gov/analyses/ssl/sslprotections_earir1210. pdf.
21. Oosterhaven J (1988) On the plausibility of the supply-driven input-output model. J Reg Sci 28(2): 203-217.
22. Oosterhaven J (1989) The supply-driven input-output model: a new interpretation but still implausible. J Reg Sci 29(3): 459 465.
23. Seung C, Waters E (2006) A review of regional economic models for fisheries management in the US. Mar Resour Econ 21(1): 101-124.
24. Seung C, Waters E (2009) Measuring the economic linkage of Alaska fisheries: a supply-driven social accounting matrix (SDSAM) approach. Fish Res 97: 17-23.
25. Steinback S (1999) Regional economic impact assessments of recreational fisheries: an application of the IMPLAN modeling system to marine party and charter boat fishing in maine. North Am J Fish Manage 19: 725-736.
26. Steinback S (2004) Using ready-made regional input-output models to estimate backward-linkage effects of exogenous output shocks. Rev Reg Stud 34(1): 57-71.
27. Tanjuakio R, Hastings S, Tytus P (1996) The economic contribution of agriculture in Delaware. Agric Resour Econ Rev 25(1): 46-53.
28. The Research Group (2007) Estimating economic impacts of Alaska fisheries using a computable general equilibrium model data acquisition and reduction task documentation. Prepared for Alaska Fisheries Science Center, Corvallis, Oregon.
29. Waters E, Weber B, Holland D (1999) The role of agriculture in Oregon's economic base: findings from a social accounting matrix. J Agric Resour Econ 24(1): 266-280.