Measuring the economic linkage of Alaska fisheries: A supply-driven social accounting matrix (SDSAM) approach

Fisheries Research

Volumn 97, Issue 1-2, 2009, Pages 17-23

  Seung, Chang K ^a   Waters, Edward C ^b  

^a ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Alaska; Fisheries impacts; Social accounting matrix (SAM)

Indexed keywords

POLLACHIUS;

EID: 61849093166     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2008.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adelman I., and Robinson S. U.S. agriculture in a general equilibrium framework: analysis with a social accounting matrix. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986) 1196-1207
2. Alaska Department of Fish and Game, 2001. Division of Commercial Fisheries Overview 2001.
3. Alaska Department of Labor and Workforce Development, 2007. 2006 Employment and Earnings Data.
4. Cai J., and Leung P. Linkage measures: a revisit and a suggested alternative. Economic Systems Research 16 (2004) 65-85
5. Cai J., Leung P., Pan M., and Pooley S. Economic linkage impacts of Hawaii's Longline Fishing Regulations. Fisheries Research 74 (2005) 232-242
6. Dietzenbacher E. In vindication of the Ghosh model: a reinterpretation as a price model. Journal of Regional Science 37 4 (1997) 629-651
7. Dietzenbacher E. More on multipliers. Journal of Regional Science 45 2 (2005) 421-426
8. Fernandez-Macho J., Gallastegui C., and Gonzalez P. Economic impacts of TAC Regulation: a supply-driven SAM approach. Fisheries Research 90 (2008) 225-234
9. Ghosh A. Input-output approach to an allocative system. Economica 25 1 (1958) 58-64
10. Holland D., and Wyeth P. SAM multipliers: their decomposition, interpretation, and relationship to input-output multipliers. Research Bulletin XB 1027 (1993), College of Agricultural and Home Economics Research Center, Washington State University
11. King, B, 1985. What is a SAM? In: Pyatt, G., Round, J. (Eds.), Social Accounting Matrices: A Basis for Planning, World Bank.
12. Leung P., and Pooley S. Regional economic impacts of reductions in fisheries production: a supply-driven approach. Marine Resource Economics 16 (2002) 251-262
13. Minnesota IMPLAN Group Inc., 2004. IMPLAN Pro User's Guide.
14. National Marine Fisheries Service, 2007. Fisheries of the United States, 2006. U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Science and Technology, Fisheries Statistics and Economics Division, Silver Spring, MD.
15. North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2005. Stock assessment and fishery evaluation report for the groundfish fisheries of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea/Aleutian Island area: economic status of the groundfish fisheries off Alaska, 2004.
16. North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 2007. Stock assessment and fishery evaluation report for the groundfish fisheries of the Gulf of Alaska and Bering Sea/Aleutian Island area: economic status of the groundfish fisheries off Alaska, 2006, Table 17.
17. Oosterhaven J. On the plausibility of the supply-driven input-output model. Journal of Regional Science 28 2 (1988) 203-217
18. Oosterhaven J. The supply-driven input-output model: a new interpretation but still implausible. Journal of Regional Science 29 3 (1989) 459-465
19. Seung C., and Waters E. The role of the Alaska seafood industry: a social accounting matrix (SAM) model approach to economic base analysis. The Annals of Regional Science 40 2 (2006) 335-350
20. Seung C., and Waters E. A review of regional economic models for fisheries management in the U.S. Marine Resource Economics 21 1 (2006) 101-124
21. Steinback S. Regional Economic Impact Assessments of recreational fisheries: an application of the IMPLAN modeling system to marine party and charter boat fishing in Maine. North American Journal of Fishery Management 19 (1999) 725-736
22. The Research Group, 2007. Estimating Economic Impacts of Alaska Fisheries Using a Computable General Equilibrium Model-Data Acquisition and Reduction Task Documentation. Prepared for Alaska Fisheries Science Center.
23. Waters E., Weber B., and Holland D. The role of agriculture in Oregon's economic base: findings from a social accounting matrix. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24 1 (1999) 266-280