Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK

Scientific Reports

Volumn 3, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Labeit, Alexander ^a   Peinemann, Frank ^b   Kedir, Abbi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b FOM UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AMBULATORY CARE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CLASS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTILIZATION; UTILIZATION REVIEW; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; STATISTICS; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MARITAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; OFFICE VISITS; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL CLASS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; UTILIZATION REVIEW; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881599496     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep02362     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. NHS. Cervical Screening Programme. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/ cervical/publications/reviews-leaflets.html (25 February 2013, date last accessed).
2. Biewenga, P. et al. Prognostic model for survival in patients with early stage cervical cancer. Cancer 117, 768-776 (2011).
3. Office for National Statistics. Cancer survival in England: Patients diagnosed 2005-2009 and followed up to 2010. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/ dcp171780-242394.pdf (25 February 2013, date last accessed).
4. Neilson, A. & Jones, R. K. Women's lay knowledge of cervical cancer/cervical screening: accounting for non-attendance at cervical screening clinics. J Adv Nurs 28, 571-575 (1998).
5. Office for National Statistics. Mortality statistics: deaths registered in 2009. http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/vsob1/mortality-statistics-deaths- registered-in-england-and-wales-series-dr-/2009/mortality-statistics-deaths- registered-in-2009.pdf (25 February 2013, date last accessed).
6. Quinn, M., Babb, P., Jones, J. & Allen, E. Effect of screening on incidence of and mortality from cancer of cervix in England: evaluation based on routinely collected statistics. BMJ 318, 904-908 (1999).
7. Austoker, J. Cancer prevention in primary care. Screening for cervical cancer. BMJ 309, 241-248 (1994).
8. NHS The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Cervical Screening Programme 2010-11. http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/cervical/cervical- statistics-bulletin-2010-11.pdf (25 February 2013, date last accessed).
9. Herbert, A., Holdsworth, G. & Kubba, A. A. Cervical screening: why young women should be encouraged to be screened. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 34, 21-25 (2008).
10. Sasieni, P., Castanon, A. & Cuzick, J. Effectiveness of cervical screening with age: population based case-control study of prospectively recorded data. BMJ 339, b2968 (2009).
11. Fiander, A. N. Cervical screening in young women aged 20-24 years. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 34, 19 (2008).
12. Rieck, G. C., Tristram, A., Hauke, A., Fielder, H. & Fiander, A. N. Cervical screening in 20-24-year olds. J Med Screen 13, 64-71 (2006).
13. Howe, A., Owen-Smith, V. & Richardson, J. Health authority cervical screening recall policies and time since last smear: a retrospective cohort analysis in the north west England. J Med Screen 10, 184-188 (2003).
14. National Health Service. in: Patnick J. (ed.) Building on experience: Cervical screening programme (NHS, London, 2002).
15. Lancuck, L., Patnick, J. & Vessey, M. A cohort effect in cervical screening coverage? J Med Screen 15, 27-29 (2008).
16. The Health and Social Care Information Centre. Cervical screening programme England 2010-11. (2011)
17. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. Annual review 2011. (25 February 2013, date last accessed).
18. Grossman, M. On the Concept of Health Capital and the Demand for Health. JPE 80, 223-255 (1972).
19. Kenkel, D. S. Prevention. in: Culyer, A. J., Newhouse, J. P. (eds.) Handbook of Health Economics. Vol. 1, Chpt. 31, 1675-1720 (Elsevier, North Holland, 2000).
20. Ehrlich, I. & Becker, G. S. Market Insurance, Self-Insurance, and Self-Protection. JPE 80, 623-648 (1972).
21. Selden, T. M. Uncertainty and health care spending by the poor: the health capital model revisited. J Health Econ 12, 109-115 (1993).
22. Zweifel, P., Breyer, F. & Kifmann, M. Health economics (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
23. Cropper, M. L. Health, Investment in Health, and Occupational Choice. JPE 85, 1273-1294 (1977).
24. Jepson, R. et al. The determinants of screening uptake and interventions for increasing uptake: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 4, 1-133 (2000).
25. Walter, L. C., Lindquist, K. & Covinsky, K. E. Relationship between health status and use of screening mammography and Papanicolaou smears among women older than 70 years of age. Ann Intern Med 140, 681-688 (2004).
26. Lairson, D. R., Chan, W. & Newmark, G. R. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States. Soc Sci Med 61, 1608-1617 (2005).
27. Sabates, R. & Feinstein, L. The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: the case of cervical screening in Britain. Soc Sci Med 62, 2998-3010 (2006).
28. Rodvall, Y., Kemetli, L., Tishelman, C. & Tornberg, S. Factors related to participation in a cervical cancer screening programme in urban Sweden. Eur J Cancer Prev 14, 459-466 (2005).
29. Lagerlund, M. et al. Sociodemographic predictors of non-attendance at invitational mammography screening-a population-based register study (Sweden). Cancer Causes Control 13, 73-82 (2002).
30. Majeed, F. A. et al. Using patient and general practice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates. BMJ 308, 1272-1276 (1994).
31. Kenkel, D. S. The Demand for Preventative Medical Care. Applied Economics 26, 313-325 (1994).
32. Challier, B., Meslans, Y. & Viel, J. F. Deprived areas and attendance to screening of cervix uteri cancer in a French region. Cancer Causes Control 11, 157-162 (2000).
33. Jenkins, S. P. The British Household Panel Survey and its income data. ISER Working Paper Series, No. 2010-33 (Colchester, 2010).
34. Scott, A. Economics of general practice. Handbook of Health Economics, Vol. 1, 1175-1200 (Elsevier 2000).
35. Wu, S. Sickness and preventive medical behavior. J Health Econ 22, 675-689 (2003).
36. Viscusi, W. K. Do Smokers Underestimate Risks? JPE 98, 1253-1269 (1990).
37. Moser, K., Patnick, J. & Beral, V. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ 338, b2025 (2009).
38. Great Britain. Commission for Rural Communities. Darzi Analysis: Access To, and Quality Of, Health Care in Rural England (Commission for Rural Communities, 2008).
39. Acton, J. P. Nonmonetary Factors in the Demand for Medical Services: Some Empirical Evidence. JPE 83, 595-614 (1975).
40. Carrieri, V. & Bilger, M. Preventive care: underused even when free. Is there something else at work? Applied Economics 45, 239-253 (2013).
41. Verbeek, M. & Nijman, T. Testing for Selectivity Bias in Panel Data Models. International Economic Review 33, 681-703 (1992).
42. Wooldridge, J. M. Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. J Appl Econ 20, 39-54 (2005).
43. Rauscher, G. H., Hawley, S. T. & Earp, J. A. Baseline predictors of initiation vs. maintenance of regular mammography use among rural women. Prev Med 40, 822-830 (2005).
44. Biro, A. An analysis of mammography decisions with a focus on education differences (University of York, Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) WP 12/11 2012).
45. Clark, M. A., Rakowski, W. & Ehrich, B. Breast and cervical cancer screening: associations with personal, spouse's, and combined smoking status. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9, 513-516 (2000).
46. Vahabi, M. & Gastaldo, D. Rational choice(s)? Rethinking decision-making on breast cancer risk and screening mammography. Nurs Inq 10, 245-256 (2003).
47. Carter, J., Park, E. R., Moadel, A., Cleary, S. D. & Morgan, C. Cancer knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and practices (KABP) of disadvantaged women in the South Bronx. J Cancer Educ 17, 142-149 (2002).
48. Meystre-Agustoni, G., Paccaud, F., Jeannin, A. & Dubois-Arber, F. Anxiety in a cohort of Swiss women participating in a mammographic screening programme. J Med Screen 8, 213-219 (2001).
49. Whynes, D. K., Philips, Z. & Avis, M. Why do women participate in the English cervical cancer screening programme? J Health Econ 26, 306-325 (2007).
50. Belkar, R., Fiebig, D. G., Haas, M. & Viney, R. Why worry about awareness in choice problems? Econometric analysis of screening for cervical cancer. Health Econ 15, 33-47 (2006).
51. Jacobsen, G. D. & Jacobsen, K. H. Health awareness campaigns and diagnosis rates: evidence from National Breast Cancer Awareness Month. J Health Econ 30, 55-61 (2011).
52. Bang, J. Y., Yadegarfar, G., Soljak, M. & Majeed, A. Primary care factors associated with cervical screening coverage in England. J Public Health (Oxf), 1-7 (2012).
53. Lurie, N. et al. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter? N Engl J Med 329, 478-482 (1993).
54. Baker, D. & Middleton, E. Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s. J Epidemiol Community Health 57, 417-423 (2003).
55. Brice, J., Buck, N. & Prentice-Lane, E. British Household Panel Survey User Manual. Volume A: Introduction, Technical Report and Appendices (Colchester, 2010).
56. Honore, B. Nonlinear models with panel data. Portugese Economic Journal 1, 163-179 (2002).
57. Wooldridge, J. M. Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels (Michigan State University, Department of Economics, 2010).
58. Heckman, J. Statistical models for discrete panel data. in: Manski, C. F., McFadden, D. (eds.) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications, Chpt. 3, 114-178 (MIT Press, Cambridge, 1981).
59. Akay, A. Finite-sample comparison of alternative methods for estimating dynamic panel data models. J Appl Econ, doi: 10.1002/jae.1254 (2011).
60. Mundlak, Y. On the Poooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data. Econometrica 46, 69-85 (1978).