Capability search and redeem across digital ecosystems

Journal of Information Technology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 183-197

  Selander, Lisen ^a   Henfridsson, Ola ^b   Svahn, Fredrik ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^c CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d VIKTORIA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

ecosystem; governance; historical analysis; innovation habitat; Sony Ericsson

Indexed keywords

DIGITAL AGE; DIGITAL ECOSYSTEM; DIGITAL MUSIC; GOVERNANCE; HISTORICAL ANALYSIS; PRODUCTS AND SERVICES; SONY ERICSSON;

INDUSTRY; MOBILE DEVICES;

ECOSYSTEMS;

EID: 84881594144     PISSN: 02683962     EISSN: 14664437     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/jit.2013.14     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Adner, R. (2006). Match your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem, Harvard Business Review 84(4): 98-107.
2. Andersson, M., Lindgren, R. and Henfridsson, O. (2008). Architectural Knowledge in Inter-Organizational IT Innovation, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 17(1): 19-38.
3. Baldwin, C.Y. and Woodard, C.J. (2009). The Architecture of Platforms: A unified view, Harvard Business School Working Paper Series (09-034).
4. Basole, R.C. (2009). Visualization of Interfirm Relations in a Converging Mobile Ecosystem, Journal of information Technology 24(2): 144-159.
5. Boudreau, K.J. (2012). Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom? An Early Look at Large Numbers of Software App Developers and Patterns of Innovation, Organization Science 23(5): 1409-1427.
6. Boudreau, K.J. and Lakhani, K.R. (2009). How to Manage Outside Innovation, Sloan Management Review 50(4): 69-76.
7. Brusoni, S. (2005). The Limits to Specialization: Problem solving and coordination in 'modular networks', Organization Studies 26(12): 1885-1907. (Pubitemid 41810648)
8. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9. Chen, S.-H. (2004). Taiwanese IT Firms' Offshore R&D in China and the Connection with the Global Innovation Network, Research Policy 33(2): 337-349.
10. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. and West, J. (eds.) (2006). Open Innovation: Researching a new paradigm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Cohen, W.M. and Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1): 128-152.
12. Demil, B. and Lecoq, X. (2006). Neither Market nor Hierarchy nor Network: The emergence of bazaar governance, Organization Studies 27(10): 1447-1466. (Pubitemid 44564383)
13. Dougherty, D. and Dunne, D.D. (2011). Organizing Ecologies of Complex Innovation, Organization Science 22(5): 1214-1223.
14. Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C. and Yoo, Y. (2011). Structures of Control and Generativity in Digital Ecosystem Service Innovation: The cases of the Apple and Google mobile app stores, Working paper series of the Department of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science (183).
15. El Sawy, O.A., Malhotra, A., Park, Y. and Pavlou, P.A. (2010). Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It takes three to tango, Information Systems Research 21(4): 835-848.
16. Evans, D.S., Hagiu, A. and Schmalensee, R. (2006). Invisible Engines, How Software Platforms Drive Innovation and Transform Industries, Cambridge, MA; London, UK: MIT Press.
17. Fleetwood, S. (2009). The Ontology of Things, Properties and Powers, Journal of Critical Realism 8(3): 343-366.
18. Galunic, D.C. and Rodan, S. (1998). Resource Re-combinations in the Firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation, Strategic Management Journal 19(12): 1193-1201. (Pubitemid 128468564)
19. Ghazawneh, A. and Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing Platform Control and External Contribution in Third-Party Development: The boundary resources model, Information Systems Journal 23(2): 173-192.
20. Gulati, R., Puranam, P. and Tushman, M. (2012). Meta-Organization Design: Rethinking design in interorganizational and community contexts, Strategic Management Journal 33(6): 571-586.
21. Hanseth, O. and Lyytinen, K. (2010). Design Theory for Dynamic Complexity in Information Infrastructures: The case of building internet, Journal of Information Technology 25(1): 1-19.
22. Hargadon, A.B. and Douglas, Y. (2001). When Innovations Meet Institutions: Edison and the design of the electric light, Administrative Science Quarterly 46(3): 476-501. (Pubitemid 33385893)
23. Helfat, C.E. and Peteraf, M.A. (2003). The Dynamic Resource-Based View: Capability lifecycles, Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 997-1010.
24. Henfridsson, O. and Bygstad, B. (2013). The Generative Mechanisms of Digital Infrastructure, MIS Quarterly 37(3), forthcoming.
25. Hiatt, S.R., Sine, W.D. and Tolbert, P.S. (2009). From Pabst to Pepsi: The deinstitutionalization of social practices and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunities, Administrative Science Quarterly 54(4): 635-667.
26. Howells, J.A. and Malik, K. (2003). The Sourcing of Technological Knowledge: Distributed innovation processes and dynamic change, R&D Management 33(4): 395-409. (Pubitemid 37052866)
27. Iansiti, M. and Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology, Harvard Business Review 84(3): 68-78.
28. Jonsson, K., Holmstrom, J. and Lyytinen, K. (2009). Turn to the Material: Remote diagnostics system and new forms of boundary spanning, Information and Organization 19(4): 233-252.
29. Katz, M. and Shapiro, K. (1994). System Competition and Network Effects, Journal of Economic Perspective 8(2): 93-115.
30. Kieser, A. (1994). Why Organization Theory needs Historical Analyses-and How this Should be Performed, Organization Science 5(4): 608-620.
31. Klein, H.K. and Myers, M.D. (1999). A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretative Field Studies in Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 23(1): 67-94.
32. Langlois, R.N. (2002). Computers and Semiconductors, in B. Steil, D.G. Victor and R.R. Nelson (eds.) Technological Innovation and Economic Performance, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 265-284.
33. Lee, G. and Cole, R. (2003). From a Firm-based to a Community-based Model of Knowledge Creation, Organization Science 14(6): 633-649.
34. Lynn, L.H., Reddy, N. and Aram, J. (1996). Linking Technology and Institutions: The innovation community framework, Research Policy 25(1): 91-106. (Pubitemid 126342044)
35. Lyytinen, K. and Rose, G.M. (2003). The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The case of internet computing in systems development organizations, MIS Quarterly 27(4): 557-596.
36. March, J.G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning, Organization Science 2(1): 71-87.
37. Moore, J.F. (1993). Predators and Prey: A new ecology of competition, Harvard Business Review 71(3): 75-84.
38. Nickerson, J.V. and zur Muehlen, M. (2006). The Ecology of Standards Processes: Insights from internet standard making, MIS Quarterly 30(3): 467-488. (Pubitemid 46050484)
39. Pentland, B.T. (1999). Building Process Theory with Narrative: From description to explanation, Academy of Management Review 24(4): 711-724.
40. Purser, R.E., Park, C. and Montuori, A. (1995). Limits to Anthropocentrism: Towards an eco-centric organization paradigm?, Academy of Management Review 20(4): 1053-1089.
41. Romano, N.C., Donovan, C., Chen, H. and Nunamaker, J.F. (2003). A Methodology for Analyzing Web-Based Qualitative Data, Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4): 213-246.
42. Rosemann, M., Lind, M. and Andersson, M. (2011). Digital Complementary Assets, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2011) (Shanghai, China, 4-7 December 2011).
43. Sawhney, M., Prandelli, E. and Verona, G. (2003). The Power of Innomediation, Sloan Management Review 44(2): 77-82. (Pubitemid 40830214)
44. Selander, L., Henfridsson, O. and Svahn, F. (2010). Transforming Ecosystem Relationships in Digital Innovation, ICIS 2010 Proceedings. Paper 138.
45. Shah, S.K. (2006). Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development, Management Science 52(7): 1000-1014. (Pubitemid 43990588)
46. Shapiro, C. and Varian, H.R. (1999). Information Rules-A strategic guide to the network economy, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
47. Simard, C. and West, J. (2006). Knowledge Networks and the Geographic Locus of Innovation, in H. Chesbrough, W. Vanhaverbeke and J. West (eds.) Open Innovation: Researching a New Paradigm, New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. Svahn, F. (2012). Digital Product Innovation: Building generative capacity through architectural frames, PhD Thesis, Umea° University, Sweden.
50. Svahn, F. and Henfridsson, O. (2012). The Dual Regimes of Digital Innovation Management, 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 45) (Maui, Hawaii).
51. Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K. and Sorensen, C. (2010). Digital Infrastructures: The missing IS research agenda, Information Systems Research 20(4): 748-759.
52. Tilson, D., Sorensen, C. and Lyytinen, K. (2013). Platform Complexity: Lessons from the music industry, in 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS 46) (Maui, HI).
53. Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B. and Bush, A.A. (2010). Platform Evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics, Information Systems Research 21(4): 685-687.
54. Tsoukas, H. (1989). The Validity of Idiographic Research Explanations, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 551-561.
55. Verganti, R. (2009). Design-Driven Innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean, Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
56. Walley, K. (2007). Coopetition: An introduction to the subject and an agenda for research, International Studies of Management and Organization 37(2): 11-31.
57. Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research: Nature and method, European Journal of Information Systems 4(2): 74-81.
58. Weddell, B.J. (2002). Conserving Living Natural Resources in the Context of a Changing World, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
59. West, J. (2003). How Open Is Open Enough? Melding Proprietary and Open Source Platform Strategies, Research Policy 37(7): 1259-1285.
60. West, J. and Gallagher, S. (2006). Challenges of Open Innovation: The paradox of firm investment in open-source software, R&D Management 36(3): 319-331. (Pubitemid 43824127)
61. West, J. and O'Mahony, S. (2008). The Role of Participation Architecture in Growing Sponsored Open Source Communities, Industry and Innovation 15(2): 145-168.
62. Yoo, Y., Henfridsson, O. and Lyytinen, K. (2010). The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An agenda for information systems research, Information Systems Research 21(4): 724-735.
63. Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K. and Boland, R.J. (2008). Distributed Innovation in Classes of Networks, 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 41) (Waikoloa, Big Island, Hawaii).
64. Zammuto, R.F., Griffith, T.L., Majchrzak, A., Dougherty, D.J. and Faraj, S. (2007). Information Technology and the Changing Fabric of Organization, Organization Science 18(5): 749-762.