Creating a supervision tool kit: How to improve probation and parole

Federal Probation

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 22-27

  Gleicher, Lily ^a   Manchak, Sarah M ^a   Cullen, Francis T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881593841     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence, NJ: Anderson.
2. Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., & Li, J. (2011). An experimental demonstration of training probation officers in evidence-based community supervision. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 38, 1127-1148.
3. Bonta, J., Bourgon, G., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., Yessine, A. K., Gutierrez, L., & Li, J. (2010). The Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision: Risk-Need-Responsivity in the Real World. Ottawa, Canada: Public Safety Canada.
4. Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. K. (2008). Exploring the Black Box of Community Supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 248-70.
5. Bordin, E. S. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252-262.
6. Bourgon, G., Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T. L., & Yessine, A. K. (2010). The role of program design, implementation, and evaluation in evidence-based "real world" community supervision. Federal Probation, 74(1), 2-15.
7. Cullen, F. T., & Smith, P. (2011). Treatment and rehabilitation. In M. Tonry (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of crime and criminal justice (pp. 156-178). New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., & Applegate, B. K. (1996). Control in the community: The limits of reform? In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional interventions that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 69-116). Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 69-116.
9. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: A metaanalytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 203-214. (Pubitemid 38352318)
10. Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2009). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce crime and criminal justice costs: Implications in Washington State. Victims and Offenders, 4, 170-196.
11. Drake, E. K., Aos, S., & Miller, M. G. (2006). Evidence-based public policy options to reduce future prison construction, criminal justice costs, and crime rates. Washington State Institute for Public Policy, October.
12. Fulton, B. B., Latessa, E. J., Stichman, A., & Travis, L. F., III (1997). The State of ISP: Research and policy implications. Federal Probation, 61(4), 65-75.
13. Gendreau, P. (1996). The principles of effective intervention with offenders. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional interventions that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 117-130). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Gendreau, P., Goggin, C., Cullen, F. T., & Andrews, D. A. (2000). The effects of community sanctions and incarceration on recidivism. Forum on Corrections Research. 12(2), 10-13.
15. Horvath, A. O., & Luborsky, L. (1993). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 561-573. (Pubitemid 23230079)
16. Kennealy, P., Skeem, J. L., Manchak, S. M., & Eno Louden, J. (2012). Offender-officer relationships matter: Firm, fair and caring officer-offender relationships protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behavior, 36, 496-505.
17. Klockars Jr., C. B. (1972). A theory of probation supervision. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology and Police Science, 63, 550-557.
18. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.
19. Lowenkamp, C. T., Flores, A. W., Holsinger, A. M., Makarios, M. D., & Latessa, E. J. (2010). Intensive supervision programs: Does program philosophy and the principles of effective intervention matter? Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 368-375.
20. Lowenkamp, C. T., Holsinger, A., Robinson, C. R., & Alexander, M. (2012). Diminishing or durable treatment effects of STARR? A research note on 24-month re-arrest rates. Journal of Crime and Justice, 1-9.
21. MacKenzie, D. L. (2006). What works in corrections: Reducing the criminal activities of offenders and delinquents. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Martinson, R. (1974). What works? Questions and answers about prison reform. The Public Interest, 35, 22-54.
23. Maruschak, L. M., & Parks, E. (2012). Probation and parole in the United States, 2011. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
24. Morris, N., & Tonry, M. H. (1990). Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Inc.
25. Paparazzi, M. A., & Gendreau, P. (2005). An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. Prison Journal, 85, 445-466. (Pubitemid 41765968)
26. Petersilia, J. (1998). A decade of experimenting with intermediate sanctions: What have we learned? Federal Probation, 62(3), 3-9. (Pubitemid 128657947)
27. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1993). Intensive probation and parole. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Vol. 17, pp. 281-335). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Robinson, C. R., Van Benschoten, S., Alexander, M., & Lowenkamp, C. T. (2011). A random (almost) study of staff training aimed at reducing re-arrest (STARR):Reducing recidivism through intentional design. Federal Probation, 75(2), 57-63.
29. Sherman, L. W., Gottfredson, D. C., MacKenzie, D. L., & Eck, J. E. (1998). Preventing crime: What works, what doesn't, and what's promising. Darby, PA: Diane Publishing Company.
30. Skeem, J. L., Kennealy, P., & Manchak, S. M. (2010, March). Do "firm but fair" relationships mediate the effect of specialty mental health supervision on recidivism? In J. Eno Louden (Chair), Mediators of success for probationers with mental illness. Symposium presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society (Vancouver, BC, Canada).
31. Skeem, J. L., Eno Louden, J., Polaschek, D., & Camp, J. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 14, 397-410.
32. Smith, P., Schweitzer, M., Labrecque, R. M., & Latessa, E. J. (2012). Improving probation officers' supervision skills: an evaluation of the EPICS model. Journal of Crime and Justice, 35, 189-199.
33. Trotter, C. (2006). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice (2nd Ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Watson, A. C., & Angell, B. (2007). Applying procedural justice theory to law enforcement's response to persons with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 58, 787-793. (Pubitemid 46985170)