The role of program design, implementation, and evaluation in evidence-based "real world" community supervision

Federal Probation

Volumn 74, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 2-15

  Bourgon, Guy ^a,b   Bonta, James ^b   Rugge, Tanya ^b   Scott, Terri Lynne ^b   Yessine, Annie K ^b  

^a Public Safety ^*  (Canada)

^b PUBLIC SAFETY CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77956294308     PISSN: 00149128     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ackerman, S. J., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2003). A review of therapist characteristics and , techniques positively impacting the therapeutic alliance. Clinical Psychology Review, 23, 1-33.
2. Ahn, H., & Wampold, B. E. (2001). Where oh where are the specific ingredients? A' meta-analysis of the component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 251-257.
3. Andrews, D. A. (1979). The dimensions of correctional counselling and supervision process in probation and parole. Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services.
4. Andrews, D. A. (2006). Enhancing adherence to risk-need-responsivity: Making quality a matter of policy. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 595-602.
5. Andrews, D. A. (2008). Extensions of the Risk-Need-Responsivity model of assessment and correctional treatment. In G. Bourgon, R.K. Hanson, J.D. Pozzulo, K.E. Morton Bourgon, & CL. Tanasichuk (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 2007 North American Correctional & Criminal Justice Psychology Conference (User Report 2008-02: pp. 7-11). Ottawa, Public Safety Canada.
6. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995) The Level of Service Inventory - Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
7. Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark, NJ: LexisNexis.
8. Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Hoge, R. D. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation: Rediscovering psychology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17, 19-52.
9. Andrews, D. A., & Carvell, C. (1997). Core correctional treatment-core correctional supervision and counselling: Theory, research, Assessment and practice. Ottawa: Department of Psychology, Carleton University.
10. Andrews, D. A., & Kiessling, J. J. (1980). Program structure and effective correctional practices: A summary of the CaVIC research. In R.R. Ross & P. Gendreau (Eds.), Effective correctional treatment (pp. 439-463). Toronto: Burterworth.
11. Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P. & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A psychologically informed meta-analysis. Criminology, 28, 419-429.
12. Aveline, M. (1997). The use of audiotapes in supervision of psychotherapy. In G. Shipton (Ed.), Supervision of psychotherapy and counseling: Making a place to think (pp. 80-92). Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
13. Ball, S.A., Martino, S., Nich, C., Frankfurter, T. L., Van Horn, D., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (2007). Site matters: Multisite randomized trial of motivational enhancement therapy in community drug abuse clinics. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 556-567.
14. Barber, J. P., Krakauer, I., Calvo, N., Badgio, P. C., & Faude, J. (1997). Measuring adherence and competence of dynamic therapist in the treatment of cocaine dependence. Journal of Psychotherapy Practice & Research, 6, 12-24.
15. Barlow, D. H. (2004). Psychological treatments. American Psychologist, 59, 869-878.
16. Barnoski, R. (2004). Outcome evaluation of Washington State's Research-based programs for juvenile offenders. Olympia, Washington: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
17. Bogue, B., Pampel, F., & Vanderbilt, R. (2007). Evaluation of alternative sanction programs, Connecticut probation and related services. Report to the Connecticut Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division, Wethersfield, CT.
18. Bonta, J., & Andrews, D.A. (2007). Risk-needresponsivity model of offender assessment and rehabilitation (User Report 2007-06). Ottawa: Public Safety Canada.
19. Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. (2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47, 248-270.
20. Caroll, K. M., Ball, S. A., Nich, C., Martino, S., Frankfurter, T. L., Farentinos, C., et al. (2006). Motivational Interviewing to improve treatment engagement and outcome in individuals seeking treatment for substance abuse: A multi-site effectiveness study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 81, 301-312.
21. Clear, T. (1994). Harm in American penology: Offenders, victims and their communities. Albany, NY: State university of New York Press.
22. Collaborative Outcome Data Committee. (2007a). Sexual offender treatment outcome research: CODC Guidelines for evaluation Part 1: Introduction and overview (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-02). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
23. Collaborative Outcome Data Committee. (2007b). The Collaborative Outcome Data Committee's guidelines for the evaluation of sexual offender treatment outcome research Part 2: CODC guidelines (Corrections Research User Report No. 2007-03). Ottawa, Ontario: Public Safety Canada.
24. Cullen, F. T., & Gilbert, K. E. (1982). Reaf-firming rehabilitation. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
25. Dowden, C., & Andrews, D. A. (2004). The importance of staff practices in delivering effective correctional treatment: A metaanalysis of core correctional practices. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48, 203-214.
26. Farrington, David P. (2006). Methodological quality and the evaluation of anti-crime programs. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 2, 329-337.
27. Farrington, David P., & Welsh, B.C. (2005). Randomized experiments in criminology: What have we learned in the past two decades? Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 9-38.
28. Frank, J. D., & Frank, J. B. (1991). Persuasion and healing: A comparative study of psychotherapy (3rd ed.). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
29. Gendreau, P., & Ross, R. R. (1979). Effective correctional treatment: Bibliotherapy for cynics. Crime & Delinquency, 25, 463-489.
30. Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2006). The implementation and maintenance of quality services in offender rehabilitation programs. In C. R. Hollin & E. J. Palmer (Eds.), Offending behavior programmes: Development, application, and controversies. Chichester (pp. 209-246). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
31. Goldkamp, J. S. (2008). Missing the target and missing the point: 'successful' random assignment but misleading results. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 4, 83-115.
32. Gondolf, E. W. (2008). Program completion in specialized batterer counseling for African-American men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 94-116.
33. Gordon, D. A., & Arbuthnot, J. (1988). The use of paraprofessionals to deliver homebased family therapy to juvenile delinquents. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 15, 364-378.
34. Hanley, D. (2006). Appropriate services: Examining the case classification principle. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42, 1-22.
35. Hanson, R.K., Bourgon, G., Helmus, L., & Hodgson, S. (2009). The principles of effective correctional treatment also apply to sexual offenders: a meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 865-891.
36. Homel, P., Nutley, S., Webb, B., & Tilly, N. (2005). Investing to deliver: reviewing the implementation of the UK crime reduction programme. Home Office Research Study 281. London, England: Home Office Research.
37. Lipsey, M. W (1989, November). The efficacy of intervention for Juvenile delinquency: results from 400 studies. (Paper presented at the 41 st annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Reno, Nevada).
38. Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: A review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297-320.
39. Lipton, D., Martinson, R., & Wilks, J. (1975). The effectiveness of correctional treatment: A survey of treatment evaluation studies. New York: Praeger.
40. Lösel, F. (1995). The efficacy of correctional treatment: A review and synthesis of metaevaluations. In J. McGuire (Ed.), What works: Reducing reoffending (pp.79-111). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
41. Lovins, L. B., Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2007). Application of the risk principle to female offenders. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23, 383-398.
42. Lowenkamp, C.T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 77-93.
43. Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 575-594.
44. Marlowe, D. B., Festinger, D. S., Lee, P. A., Dugosh, K. L., & Benasutti, K. M. (2006). Matching judicial supervision in clients' risk status in drug court. Crime & Delinquency, 52, 52-76.
45. Miller, W. R., & Mount, K. A. (2001). A small study of training in motivational interviewing: Does one workshop change clinician and client behavior? Behavioral and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 29, 457-471.
46. Palmer, T. (1975). Martinson revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12, 133-152.
47. Palmer, E. J., McGuire, J., Hatcher, R. M., Hounsome, J. C., Bilby, C. A. L. & Hollin, C. R. (2008). The importance of appropriate allocation to offending programs. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 52, 206-221.
48. Public Safety Canada (2008). Corrections and Conditional Release Statistical Overview 2008. Ottawa, Public Safety Canada.
49. Raynor, P. (2004). The probation service "pathfinders": finding the path and losing the way? Criminal Justice, 4, 309-325.
50. Raynor, P. (2008). Community penalties and Home Office research: On the way back to "nothing works"? Criminology & Criminal Justice, 8, 73-87.
51. Redondo, S., Garrido, V., & Sanchez-Mecca, J. (1999). The influence of treatment programs on the recidivism of juvenile and adult offenders: A European meta-analytic review. Psychology, Crime, and Law, 5, 251-278.
52. Rhine, E.E., Mawhorr, T.L., & Parks, E.C. (2006). Implementation: The bane of effective correctional programs. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 347-358.
53. Taxman, F. S., & Marlowe, D. (2006). Risk, needs, responsivity: In action or inaction? Crime & Delinquency, 52, 3-6.
54. Trotter, C. (1996). The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections: Cause for optimism. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 29, 1-18.
55. Trotter, C. (2006). Working with involuntary clients: A guide to practice (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
56. Wampold, B. E. (2007). Psychotherapy: The humanistic (and effective) treatment. American Psychologist, 62, 857-873.
57. Welsh, W.N. (2006). The need for a comprehensive approach to program planning, development, and evaluation. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 603-614.
58. Wilson, J.A. & Davis, R.C. (2006). Good intentions meet hard realities: an evaluation of the Project Greenlight reentry program. Criminology & Public Policy, 5, 303-338.