Food reinforcement partially mediates the effect of socioeconomic status on body mass index

Obesity

Volumn 21, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1307-1312

  Lin, Henry ^a   Carr, Katelyn A ^a   Fletcher, Kelly D ^a   Epstein, Leonard H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HUNGER; INCOME; MALE; MINORITY GROUP; OBESITY; REINFORCEMENT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOCIAL STATUS;

EID: 84881556190     PISSN: 19307381     EISSN: 1930739X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/oby.20158     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, et al. Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: what the patterns tell us. Am J Public Health 2010; 100 (Suppl 1): S186-S196.
2. Schoenborn CA, Adams PF, Barnes PM,. Body weight status of adults: United States, 1997-98. Adv Data 2002; 330: 1-15.
3. Epstein LH, Leddy JJ, Temple JL, et al. Food reinforcement and eating: a multilevel analysis. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 884-906.
4. Epstein LH, Carr KA, Lin H, et al. Food reinforcement, energy intake, and macronutrient choice. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 94: 12-18.
5. Epstein LH, Temple JL, Neaderhiser BJ, et al. Food reinforcement, the dopamine D2 receptor genotype, and energy intake in obese and nonobese humans. Behav Neurosci 2007; 121: 877-886.
6. Townsend MS, Peerson J, Love B, et al. Food insecurity is positively related to overweight in women. J Nutr 2001; 131: 1738-1745.
7. Lowe MR, Butryn ML,. Hedonic hunger: a new dimension of appetite? Physiol Behav 2007; 91: 432-439.
8. Raynor HA, Epstein LH,. The relative-reinforcing value of food under differing levels of food deprivation and restriction. Appetite 2003; 40: 15-24.
9. Carr KD,. Feeding, drug abuse, and the sensitization of reward by metabolic need. Neurochem Res 1996; 21: 1455-1467.
10. Olson CM, Bove CF, Miller EO,. Growing up poor: long-term implications for eating patterns and body weight. Appetite 2007; 49: 198-207.
11. Estabrooks PA, Lee RE, Gyurcsik NC,. Resources for physical activity participation: does availability and accessibility differ by neighborhood socioeconomic status? Ann Behav Med 2003; 25: 100-104.
12. Chaput JP, Klingenberg L, Astrup A, et al. Modern sedentary activities promote overconsumption of food in our current obesogenic environment. Obes Rev 2011; 12: e12-e20.
13. Lioret S, Maire B, Volatier JL, et al. Child overweight in France and its relationship with physical activity, sedentary behaviour and socioeconomic status. Eur J Clin Nutr 2007; 61: 509-516.
14. Field M, Santarcangelo M, Sumnall H, et al. Delay discounting and the behavioural economics of cigarette purchases in smokers: the effects of nicotine deprivation. Psychopharmacology 2006; 186: 255-263.
15. Baker EA, Schootman M, Barnidge E, et al. The role of race and poverty in access to foods that enable individuals to adhere to dietary guidelines. Prevent Chronic Dis 2006; 3: A76.
16. Drewnowski A, Darmon N,. The economics of obesity: dietary energy density and energy cost. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 82: 265S-273S.
17. Morland KB, Evenson KR,. Obesity prevalence and the local food environment. Health Place 2009; 15: 491-495.
18. Giskes K, Avendano M, Brug J, et al. A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obes Rev 2010; 11: 413-429.
19. Clark EN, Dewey AM, Temple JL,. Effects of daily snack food intake on food reinforcement depend on body mass index and energy density. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 91: 300-308.
20. Braveman PA, Cubbin C, Egerter S, et al. Socioeconomic status in health research-one size does not fit all. J Am Med Assoc 2005; 294: 2879-2888.
21. Poulton R, Caspi A, Milne BJ, et al. Association between children's experience of socioeconomic disadvantage and adult health: a life-course study. Lancet 2002; 360: 1640-1645.
22. Reiss S, Havercamp S,. The sensitivity theory of motivation: implications for psychopathology. Behav Res Ther 1996; 34: 621-632.
23. Preacher KJ, Hayes AF,. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 2004; 36: 717-731.
24. Preacher KJ, Kelley K,. Effect size measures for mediation models: quantitative strategies for communicating indirect effects. Psychol Methods 2011; 16: 93-115.
25. Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Lawes CMM, et al. Rethinking the "diseases of affluence" paradigm: global patterns of nutritional risks in relation to economic development. Plos Med 2005; 2: 404-412.
26. Dinour LM, Bergen D, Yeh MC,. The food insecurity-obesity paradox: a review of the literature and the role food stamps may play. J Am Dietetic Assoc 2007; 107: 1952-1961.
27. VanGaal LF, Wauters MA, DeLeeuw IH,. The beneficial effects of modest weight loss on cardiovascular risk factors. Int J Obes 1997; 21: S5-S9.
28. Leung CW, Willett WC, Ding EL,. Low-income supplemental nutrition assistance program participation is related to adiposity and metabolic risk factors. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 95: 17-24.
29. Giesen JC, Havermans RC, Douven A, et al. Will work for snack food: the association of BMI and snack reinforcement. Obesity 2010; 18: 966-970.
30. Epstein LH, Dearing KK, Roba LG, et al. The influence of taxes and subsidies on energy purchased in an experimental purchasing study. Psychol Sci 2010; 21: 406-414.
31. Epstein LH, Paluch RA, Gordy CC, et al. Decreasing sedentary behaviors in treating pediatric obesity. Arch Pediat Adol Med 2000; 154: 220-226.
32. Blatt AD, Roe LS, Rolls BJ,. Hidden vegetables: an effective strategy to reduce energy intake and increase vegetable intake in adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2011; 93: 756-763.
33. Epstein LH, Truesdale R, Wojcik A, et al. Effects of deprivation on hedonics and reinforcing value of food. Physiol Behav 2003; 78: 221-227.
34. Lowe MR, Butryn ML, Didie ER, et al. The power of food scale: a new measure of the psychological influence of the food environment. Appetite 2009; 53: 114-118.