A novel anaerobic co-culture system for bio-hydrogen production from sugarcane bagasse

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 144, Issue , 2013, Pages 623-631

  Cheng, Jingrong ^a   Zhu, Mingjun ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Bio hydrogen; Co culture; Mild alkali pretreatment; Sugarcane bagasse

Indexed keywords

BAGASSE; HYDROGEN;

ALKALI PRETREATMENT; BIO-HYDROGEN; BIO-HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; COCULTURE; CONSOLIDATED BIO-PROCESSING; PRETREATMENT CONDITIONS; SUGAR-CANE BAGASSE;

HYDROGEN PRODUCTION;

BAGASSE; HYDROGEN;

BACTERIUM; BIOFUEL; BIOTECHNOLOGY; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CROP RESIDUE; HYDROGEN; SUGAR CANE;

ARTICLE; BATCH FERMENTATION; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CARBON SOURCE; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; COCULTURE; ENERGY YIELD; MONOCULTURE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CROSS LINKING; SUGARCANE; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM AOTEAROENSE;

CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM AOTEAROENSE;

BIO-HYDROGEN; CO-CULTURE; MILD ALKALI PRETREATMENT; SUGARCANE BAGASSE;

AMMONIA; ANAEROBIOSIS; BIOFUELS; CELLULOSE; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; FERMENTATION; HYDROGEN; HYDROGEN PEROXIDE; SACCHARUM; SODIUM HYDROXIDE; TEMPERATURE; THERMOANAEROBACTERIUM; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84881549049     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alvira P., Tomás-Pejó E., Ballesteros M., Negro M.J. Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:4851-4861.
2. Cai Y., Lai C., Li S., Liang Z., Zhu M., Liang S., Wang J. Disruption of lactate dehydrogenase through homologous recombination to improve bioethanol production in Thermoanaerobacterium aotearoense. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2010, 48:155-161.
3. Chang V.S., Holtzapple M.T. Fundamental factors affecting biomass enzymatic reactivity. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2000, 84-86:5-37.
4. Eriksson T., Karlsson J., Tjerneld F. A model explaining declining rate in hydrolysis of lignocellulose substrates with cellobiohydrolase I (cel7A) and endoglucanase I (cel7B) of Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2002, 31:41-60.
5. Eriksson T., Börjesson J., Tjerneld F. Mechanism of surfactant effect in enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2002, 31:353-364.
6. Feng X., Wang H., Wang Y., Wang X., Huang J. Biohydrogen production from apple pomace by anaerobic fermentation with river sludge. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35:3058-3064.
7. Tarkow H., Feist W.C. A Mechanism for improving the digestibility of lignocellulosic materials with dilute alkali and liquid ammonia. Cellulases and Their Applications 1969, 197-218. Am. Chem. Soc, Washington, DC. G.J. Hajny, E.T. Reese (Eds.).
8. Hartemink A.E. Sugarcane for bioethanol: soil and environmental issues. Adv. Agron. 2008, 99:125-182.
9. Holtzapple M., Cognata M., Shu Y., Hendrickson C. Inhibition of Trichoderma reesei cellulase by sugars and solvents. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1990, 36:275-287.
10. Hu J., Arantes V., Saddler J.N. The enhancement of enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic substrates by the addition of accessory enzymes such as xylanase: is it an additive or synergistic effect?. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2011, 4:36.
11. Kristensen J.B., Felby C., Jorgensen H. Yield-determining factors in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2009, 2:11.
12. Lamed R., Zeikus J.G. Ethanol production by thermophilic bacteria: relationship between fermentation product yields of and catabolic enzyme activities in Clostridium thermocellum and Thermoanaerobium brockii. J. Bacteriol. 1980, 2:569.
13. Li P., Zhu M. A consolidated bio-processing of ethanol from cassava pulp accompanied by hydrogen production. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:10471-10479.
14. Li Q., Liu C. Co-culture of Clostridium thermocellum and Clostridium thermosaccharolyticum for enhancing hydrogen production via thermophilic fermentation of cornstalk waste. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37:10648-10654.
15. Li S., Lai C., Cai Y., Yang X., Yang S., Zhu M., Wang J., Wang X. High efficiency hydrogen production from glucose/xylose by the ldh-deleted Thermoanaerobacterium strain. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8718-8724.
16. Liu Y., Yu P., Song X., Qu Y. Hydrogen production from cellulose by co-culture of Clostridium thermocellum JN4 and Thermoanaerobacterium thermosaccharolyticum GD17. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:2927-2933.
17. Lynd L.R., Grethlein H. Fermentation of cellulosic substrate in batch and continuous culture by Clostridium thermocellum. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1989, 55:3131-3139.
18. Mosier N., Wyman C., Dale B., Elander R., Lee Y.Y., Holtzapple M., Ladisch M. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:673-686.
19. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2008. Standard Biomass Analytical Procedures. http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/analytical_procedures.html.
20. Obied H.K., Prenzler P.D., Robards K. Potent antioxidant biophenols from olive mill waste. Food Chem. 2008, 111:171-178.
21. Özkan M., Yilmaz E.I., Lynd L.R., Özcengiz G. Cloning and expression of the Clostridium thermocellum l-lactate dehydrogenase gene in Escherichia coli and enzyme characterization. Can. J. Microbiol. 2004, 50:845-851.
22. Philippidis G.P.S.T. Study of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose for production of fuel ethanol by the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1993, 41:846-853.
23. Qing Q., Yang B. Xylooligomers are strong inhibitors of cellulose hydrolysis by enzymes. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:9624-9630.
24. Stefano M., Johan M., Guido Z. Techno-economic evaluation of 2nd generation bioethanol production from sugar cane bagasse and leaves integrated with the sugar-based ethanol process. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2012, 5:22.
25. Sun Y., Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 83:1-11.
26. Wang A., Ren N., Shi Y., Lee D. Bioaugmented hydrogen production from microcrystalline cellulose using co-culture-Clostridium acetobutylicum X9 and Ethanoigenens harbinense B49. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:912-917.
27. Wyman C.E. Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization 1996, Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC.
28. Wyman C.E., Dale B.E., Elander R.T., Holtzapple M., Ladisch M.R., Lee Y.Y. Coordinated development of leading biomass pretreatment technologies. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96:1959-1966.
29. Xiao Z., Zhang X., Gregg D.J., Saddler J.N. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and beta-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2004, 16:1115-1126.
30. Xu C., Qin Y., Li Y., Ji Y., Huang J., Song H., Xu J. Factors influencing cellulosome activity in consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic ethanol. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 101:9560-9569.
31. Xu F., Shi Y., Wang D. Structural features and changes of lignocellulosic biomass during thermochemical pretreatments: a synchrotron X-ray scattering study on photoperiod-sensitive sorghum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2012, 88:1149-1156.
32. Xu Z., Wang Q., Jiang Z., Yang X., Ji Y. Enzymatic hydrolysis of pretreated soybean straw. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31:162-167.
33. Zhao X.B., Peng F., Cheng K.K., Liu D.H. Enhancement of the enzymatic digestibility of sugarcane bagasse by alkali-peracetic acid pretreatment. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2009, 44:17-23.
34. 2 and ionic liquid for efficient hydrolysis and bioethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 119:199-207.