Adverse events of computed tomography colonography: An Italian National Survey

Digestive and Liver Disease

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 645-650

  Iafrate, Franco ^a   Iussich, Gabriella ^b   Correale, Loredana ^c   Hassan, Cesare ^d   Regge, Daniele ^b   Neri, Emanuele ^e   Baldassari, Paolo ^a   Ciolina, Maria ^a   Pichi, Alessandro ^a   Iannitti, Marcella ^a   Diacinti, Davide ^a   Laghi, Andrea ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b CANDIOLO CANCER INSTITUTE   (Italy)

^c Medical Imaging Lab SpA   (Italy)

^d NUOVO REGINA MARGHERITA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Colon cancer; CT colonography; Perforation; Survey; Vasovagal syncope; Virtual colonoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; AERATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTESTINE PERFORATION; ITALY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR;

COLON CANCER; CT COLONOGRAPHY; PERFORATION; SURVEY; VASOVAGAL SYNCOPE; VIRTUAL COLONOSCOPY;

COLON; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL PERFORATION; ITALY; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; RUPTURE;

EID: 84881547495     PISSN: 15908658     EISSN: 18783562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.02.020     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Pickhardt P.J., Choi J.R., Hwang I., et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New England Journal of Medicine 2003, 349:2191-2200.
2. Pickhardt P.J., Taylor A.J., Kim D.H., et al. Screening for colorectal neoplasia with CT colonography: initial experience from the 1st year of coverage by third-party payers. 1. Radiology 2006, 241:417-425.
3. Levin B., Lieberman D.A., McFarland B., et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2008, 58:130-160.
4. Fenlon H.M., Nunes D.P., Schroy P.C., et al. A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. New England Journal of Medicine 1999, 341:1496-1503.
5. Reuterskiöld M.H., Lasson A., Svensson E., et al. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography colonography in symptomatic patients and in patients with increased risk for colorectal disease. Acta Radiologica 2006, 47:888-889.
6. Laghi A., Iannaccone R., Carbone I., et al. Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. American Journal of Surgery 2002, 183:124-131.
7. Iafrate F., Hassan C., Ciolina M., et al. High positive predictive value of CT colonography in a referral centre. European Journal of Radiology 2011, 80:289-292.
8. Johnson C.D., Chen M.H., Toledano A.Y., et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. New England Journal of Medicine 2008, 359:1207-1217.
9. Regge D., Laudi C., Galatola G., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association 2009, 301:2453-2461.
10. Svensson M.H., Svensson E., Lasson A., et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002, 222:337-345.
11. Gluecker T.M., Johnson C.D., Harmsen W.S., et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003, 227:378-384.
12. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., Saunders B.P., et al. Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. American Journal of Roentgenology 2003, 181:913-921.
13. Edwards J.T., Mendelson R.M., Fritschi L., et al. Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 2004, 230:459-464.
14. U.S.Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2008, 149:627-637.
15. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Decision memo for screening computed tomography (CTC) for colorectal cancer (CAG-00396N) 2009, https://www.cms.hhs.gov/mcd/viewdecisionmemo.asp?from2=viewdecisionmemo.asp&id=220&.
16. Anderson M.L., Pasha T.M., Leighton J.A. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. American Journal of Gastroenterology 2000, 95:3418-3422.
17. Gatto N.M., Frucht H., Sundarajan V., et al. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2003, 95:230-236.
18. Burling D., Halligan S., Slater A., et al. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006, 239:464-471.
19. Sosna J., Blachar A., Amitai M., et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006, 239:457-463.
20. Pickhardt P.J. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006, 239:313-316.
21. Pickhardt P.J., Barish M.A., Barlow D.S., et al. Significant complications at CT colonography: survey results from the Working Group on Virtual Colonoscopy. Sixth International Symposium on Virtual Colonoscopy 2005.
22. Pendsé D.A. Taylor complications of CT colonography: a review. European Journal of Radiology 2012, 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.04.011.
23. Burling D. CT colonography standards. Clinical Radiology 2010, 65:474-480.
24. Rockey D.C., Barish M., Brill J., et al. Standards for gastroenterologists for performing and interpreting diagnostic computed tomographic colonography. Gastroenterology 2007, 133:1005-1024.
25. Dachman A., Laghi A. Atlas of virtual colonoscopy 2011, Springer Book, New York.
26. Hosmer D., Lemeshow S Applied logistic regression 1989, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
27. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern applied statistics with S 2002, Springer, New York, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/pub/MASS4. 4th ed.
28. Brown H., Prescott R: applied mixed models in medicine 1999, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
29. R Development Core Team R: a language and environment for statistical computing 2009, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN 3-900051-07-0, UR http://www.R-project.org.
30. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes 2011 2011, R package version 0.999375-42/r1414. http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/lme4/.
31. Moya A., Sutton R., Ammirati F., et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). European Heart Journal 2009, 30:2631-2671.
32. Neri E., Caramella D., Vannozzi F., et al. Vasovagal reactions in CT colonography. Abdominal Imaging 2007, 32:552-555.
33. Rankin G.B. Indications, contraindications, and complications of colonoscopy. Gastroenterological endoscopy 1987, 868-880. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1987. M. Sivak (Ed.).
34. Eckardt V.F., Kanzler G., Schmitt T., et al. Complications and adverse effects of colonoscopy with selective sedation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 1999, 49:560-565.
35. Lee J.G., Leung J.W., Cotton PB Acute cardiovascular complications of endoscopy: prevalence and clinical characteristics. Digestive Diseases 1995, 13:130-135.
36. Macrae F.A., Tan K.G., Williams CB Towards safer colonoscopy: a report on the complications of 5000 diagnostic or therapeutic colonoscopies. Gut 1983, 24:376-383.
37. Taylor S.A., Halligan S., O'Donnell C., et al. Cardiovascular effects at multi-detector row CT colonography compared with those at conventional endoscopy of the colon. Radiology 2003, 229:782-790.
38. Levinson DR. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General; 2008, December. Report No. OEI-06-07-00470.
39. Misra T., Lalor E., Fedorak R.N. Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 2004, 18:221-226.
40. Cobb W.S., Henifort B.T., Sigmon L.B., et al. Colonoscopic perforations: incidence, management, and outcomes. American Surgeon 2004, 70:750-757.
41. Rabeneck L., Paszat L.F., Hilsden R.J., et al. Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 2008, 135:1899-1906.
42. Arora G., Mannalithara A., Singh G., et al. Risk of perforation from a colonoscopy in adults: a large population-based study. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2009, 69:654-664.
43. Bowles C.J., Leicester R., Romaya C., et al. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?. Gut 2004, 53:277-283.
44. Sieg A., Theilmeier A. Results of colonoscopy screening in 2005-an internet-based documentation. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 2006, 131:379-383.
45. Neri E., Halligan S., Hellstrom M., et al. The second ESGAR consensus statements on CT colonography. European Radiology 2012, 10.1007/s00330-012-2632-x.
46. Atalla M.A., Rozen W.M., Niewiadomski O.D., et al. Risk factors for colonic perforation after screening computed tomographic colonography: a multicentre analysis and review of the literature. Journal of Medical Screening 2010, 17:99-102.
47. 2 insufflation. American Journal of Roentgenology 2008, 191:1077-1081.