Detection of occult colonic perforation before CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy: Perforation rate and use of a low-dose diagnostic scan before CO2 insufflation

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 191, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1077-1081

  Hough, David M ^a   Kuntz, Martin A ^a,b   Fidler, Jeff L ^a   Johnson, C Daniel ^c   Petersen, Bret T ^a   Kofler, James M ^a   Fletcher, Joel G ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b Carle Clinic   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon; Colonography; Colonoscopy; CT colonography; Perforation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ABDOMINAL DISCOMFORT; ADULT; AGED; ANUS SPHINCTER; ARTICLE; COLON PERFORATION; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARBON DIOXIDE; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINAL PERFORATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 53249111694     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2746     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Church JM. Complete colonoscopy: how often? And if not, why not? Am J Gastroenterol 1994; 89:556-559
2. Ball JE, Osbourne J, Jowett S, Pellen M, Welfare MR. Quality improvement programme to achieve acceptable colonoscopy completion rates: prospective before and after study. BMJ 2004; 329:665-667
3. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH, Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Johnston TK. Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55:307-314
4. Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Ekbom A, Blomquist P. Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis 2005; 37:113-118
5. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O. A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 2004; 53:277-283
6. Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ. Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. AJR 1999; 173:561-564
7. Neri E, Giusti P, Battolla L, et al. Colorectal cancer: role of CT colonography in preoperative evaluation after incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2002; 223:615-619
8. Fenlon HM, McAneny DB, Nunes DP, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT. Occlusive colon carcinoma: virtual colonoscopy in the preoperative evaluation of the proximal colon. Radiology 1999; 210:423-428
9. Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, Goldberg SN, McGee JB, Raptopoulos V. Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. AJR 1999; 172:913-918
10. Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal J, Raptopoulos V, Farrell RJ, Morrin MM. CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 2007; 244:471-478
11. Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR 2008; 190:145-150
12. Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, Jacobson JS, Grann VR, Neugut AI. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95:230-236
13. Misra T, Lalor E, Fedorak RN. Endoscopic perforation rates at a Canadian university teaching hospital. Can J Gastroenterol 2004; 18:221-226
14. Farley DR, Bannon MP, Zietlow SP, Pemberton JH, Ilstrup DM, Larson DR. Management of colonoscopic perforations. Mayo Clin Proc 1997; 72:729-733
15. Cobb WS, Henifort BT, Sigmon LB, et al. Colonoscopic perforations: incidence, management, and outcomes. Am Surg 2004; 70:750-757
16. Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, Noakes MJ, Taylor SA. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology 2006; 239:464-471
17. Sosna J, Blachar A, Amitai M, et al. Colonic perforation at CT colonography: assessment of risk in a multicenter large cohort. Radiology 2006; 239: 457-463
18. Limburg PJ, Fletcher JG. Making sense of CT colonography-related complication rates. Gastroenterology 2006; 131:2023-2024
19. Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults. Radiology 2006; 239:313-316
20. International Commission on Radiation Protection. 1990 recommendation of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. New York, NY: International Commission on Radiation Protection, 1991:ICRP publication 60
21. Jones D, Shrimpton P. Normalised organ doses for x-ray computed tomography calculated using Monte Carlo techniques. Chilton, UK: National Radiological Protection Board, 1991: NRPB publication SR250
22. impactscan.org Website. Keat N. CTDosimetry. xls. London, UK: ImPACT, 2006. impactscan. org/ctdosimetry.htm. Accessed July 29, 2008
23. Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38:964-968
24. Shah HA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Stukel TA, Rabeneck L. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study. Gastroenterology 2007; 132:2297-2303
25. Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR 2007; 189:774-779
26. Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA. Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 2000; 95:3418-3422
27. Iqbal CW, Chun YS, Farley DR. Colonoscopic perforations: a retrospective review. J Gastrointest Surg 2005; 9:1229-1236
28. Lüning TH, Keemers-Gels ME, Barendregt WB, Tan AC, Rosman C. Colonoscopic perforations: a review of 30,366 patients. Surg Endosc 2007; 21:994-997
29. Harned RK, Consigny PM, Cooper NB, Williams SM, Woltjen AJ. Barium examination following biopsy of the rectum or colon. Radiology 1982; 145:11-16