Model-based analysis of avoidance of ozone stress by stomatal closure in Siebold's beech (Fagus crenata)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 112, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1149-1158

  Hoshika, Yasutomo ^a   Watanabe, Makoto ^a   Inada, Naoki ^a   Koike, Takayoshi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Fagus crenata; photosynthesis stomatal model; Siebold's beech; stomatal closure; stomatal conductance; stress avoidance; Tropospheric ozone

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; AVOIDANCE REACTION; CARBON DIOXIDE; DECIDUOUS TREE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; GAS EXCHANGE; OPTIMIZATION; OZONE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TOLERANCE; TROPOSPHERE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; OZONE; WATER;

AIR POLLUTANT; ARTICLE; BEECH; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DRUG EFFECT; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; FAGUS CRENATA; JAPAN; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PHOTOSYNTHESIS-STOMATAL MODEL; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; SEASON; SIEBOLD'S BEECH; STOMATAL CLOSURE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; STRESS AVOIDANCE; THEORETICAL MODEL; TROPOSPHERIC OZONE;

FAGUS CRENATA; PHOTOSYNTHESIS-STOMATAL MODEL; SIEBOLD'S BEECH; STOMATAL CLOSURE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; STRESS AVOIDANCE; TROPOSPHERIC OZONE;

AIR POLLUTANTS; CARBON DIOXIDE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; FAGUS; JAPAN; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OZONE; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; PLANT TRANSPIRATION; SEASONS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL; WATER;

EID: 84881528277     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mct166     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Akimoto H. 2003. Global air quality and pollution. Science 302: 1716-1719.
2. AndersenCP. 2003. Source-sink balance and carbon allocation belowground in plants exposed to ozone. New Phytologist 157: 213-228.
3. Arneth A, Lloyd J, Santruckova H, et al. 2002. Response of central Siberian Scots pine to soilwater deficit and long-term trends in atmosphericCO2 concentration. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 16: 10054.
4. Ball JT, Woodrow IE, Berry JA. 1987. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: Biggens J. ed. Progress in photosynthesis research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus-Nijhoff Publishers, 221-224.
5. Bernacchi CJ, Singsaas EL, Pimentel C, Portis AR Jr, Long SP. 2001. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell and Environment 24: 253-259.
6. Cowan IR. 2002. Fit, fitter, fittest; where does optimization fit in. Silva Fennica 36: 745-754.
7. Cowan IR, Farquhar GD. 1977. Stomatal function in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. In: Jennings DH. ed. Integration of activity in the higher plant. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 471-505.
8. Emberson LD, Ashmore MR, Cambridge HM, Simpson D, Tuovinen JP. 2000. Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environmental Pollution 109: 403-413.
9. Farage PK, Long SP. 1995. An in vivo analysis of photosynthesis during shortterm O3 exposure in three contrasting species. Photosynthesis Research 43: 11-18.
10. Farage PK, Long SP, Lechner EG, Baker NR. 1991. The sequence of change within the photosynthetic apparatus of wheat following short-term exposure to ozone. Plant Physiology 95: 529-535.
11. Farquhar GD, von Caemmerer S, Berry JA. 1980. A biochemical model of photosyntheticCO2 assimilation in leavesofC3 species. Planta 149: 78-90.
12. Fowler D. 2008. Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: future trends, impacts and policy implications. London: The Royal Society.
13. Furukawa A, Park S, FujinumaY. 1990. Hybrid poplar stomata unresponsive to changes in environmental conditions. Trees 4: 191-197.
14. Grams TEE, Anegg S, Häberle K-H, Langebartels C, Matyssek R. 1999. Interactions of chronic exposure to elevated CO2 andO3 levels in the photosynthetic light and dark reactions of European beech (Fagus sylvatica). New Phytologist 144: 95-107.
15. Grulke NE, Alonso R, Nguyen T, Cascio C, Dobrowolski W. 2004. Stomata open at night in pole-sized and mature ponderosa pine: implications for O3 exposure metrics. Tree Physiology 24: 1001-1010.
16. Grulke NE, Paoletti E, Heath RL. 2007. Chronic vs. short-term acuteO3 exposure effects on nocturnal transpiration in two Californian oaks. Scientific World Journal 7: 134-140.
17. Hari P, MäkeläA, Korpilahti E, Holmberg M. 1986. Optimal control of gas exchange. Tree Physiology 2: 169-175
18. Heath RL, Taylor GE. 1997. Physiological processes and plant responses to ozone exposure. In: Sandermann H, Wellburn AR, Heath RL. eds. Forest decline and ozone. Ecological studies 127. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 317-368.
19. Hicks BB, Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP, Hosker RP Jr, Matt DR. 1987. Apreliminary multiple resistance routine for deriving dry deposition velocities from measured quantities. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 36: 311-330.
20. Hoshika Y, Watanabe M, Inada N, Koike T. 2012a. Ozone-induced stomatal sluggishness develops progressively in Siebold's beech (Fagus crenata). Environmental Pollution 166: 152-156.
21. Hoshika Y, Watanabe M, Inada N, Koike T. 2012b. Modeling of stomatal conductance for estimating ozone uptake of Fagus crenata under experimentally enhanced free-air ozone exposure. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 223: 3893-3901.
22. Iio A, Yokoyama A, Takano M, et al. 2008. Interannual variation in leaf photosynthetic capacity during summer in relation to nitrogen, leaf mass per area and climate within a Fagus crenata crown on Naeba Mountain, Japan. Tree Physiology 28: 1421-1429.
23. Karlsson PE, Braun S, Broadmeadow M, et al. 2007. Risk assessments for forest trees: the performance of the ozone flux versus the AOT concepts. Environmental Pollution 146: 608-616.
24. Karnosky D, Percy KE, Chappelka AH, Simpson C, Pikkarainen J. 2003. Air pollution, global change and forests in the new millennium. Oxford: Elsevier.
25. Katul GG, Palmroth S, Oren R. 2009. Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under current and CO2-enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. Plant, Cell and Environment 32: 968-979.
26. Kikuzawa K. 1983. Leaf survival of woody plants in deciduous broad-leaved forests. 1. Tall trees. Canadian Journal of Botany 61: 2133-2139.
27. Kitao M, Löw M, Heerdt C, Grams TEE, Häberle K-H, Matyssek R. 2009. Effects of chronic elevated ozone exposure on gas exchange responses of adult beech trees (Fagus sylvatica) as related to the within-canopy light gradient. Environmental Pollution 157: 537-544.
28. Koch JR, Scherzer AJ, EshitaS M, Davis KR. 1998. Ozonesensitivity in hybrid poplar is correlated with a lack of defense-gene activation. Plant Physiology 118: 1243-1252.
29. Koike T. 1988. Leaf structure and photosynthetic performance as related to the forest succession of deciduous broad-leaved trees. Plant Species Biology 3: 77-87.
30. Laisk A, Kull O, Moldau H. 1989. Ozone concentration in leaf intercellular air spaces is close to zero. Plant Physiology 90: 1163-1167
31. Leuning R. 1995. A critical appraisal of a coupled stomatal- photosynthesis model for C3 plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 18: 339-357.
32. Levitt J. 1972. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. New York: Academic Press.
33. Lombardozzi D, Sparks JP, Bonan G, Levis S. 2012. Ozone exposure causes a decoupling of conductance and photosynthesis: implications for the Ball- Berry stomatal conductance model. Oecologia 169: 651-659.
34. Long SP, Bernacchi CJ. 2003. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. Journal of Experimental Botany 54: 2393-2401.
35. Löw M, Herbinger K, Nunn AJ, et al. 2006. Extraordinary drought of 2003 overrules ozone impact on adult beech trees (Fagus sylvatica). Trees 20: 539-548.
36. MäkeläA, Berninger F, Hari P. 1996. Optimal control of gas exchange during drought: theoretical analysis. Annals of Botany 77: 461-467.
37. Martin MJ, Farage PK, Humphries SW, Long SP. 2000. Can the stomatal changes caused by acute ozone exposure be predicted by changes occurring in the mesophyll? A simpification for models of vegetation response to the global increase in tropospheric elevated ozone episodes. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27: 211-219.
38. Matyssek R, Sandermann H. 2003. Impact of ozone on trees: an ecophysiological perspective. In: Esser K, Lüttge U, Beyschlag W, Hellwig F. eds. An ecophysiological perspective. Progress in Botany vol. 64. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 349-404.
39. Matyssek R, Günthardt-Goerg MS, Maurer S, Keller T. 1995. Nighttime exposure to ozone reduces whole-plant production in Betula pendula. Tree Physiology 15: 159-165.
40. Matyssek R, Bytnerowicz A, Karlsson P-E, et al. 2007. Promoting the O3 flux concept for European forest trees. Environmental Pollution 146: 587-607.
41. McAinsh MR, Evans NH, Montgomery LT, North KA. 2002. Calcium signalling in stomatal responses to pollutants. New Phytologist 153: 441-447.
42. Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Eamus D, et al. 2011. Reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modeling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biology 17: 2134-2144.
43. Medlyn BE, Duursma RA, Eamus D, et al. 2012. Corrigendum: reconciling the optimal and empirical approaches to modeling stomatal conductance. Global Change Biology 18: 3476.
44. Mills G, Hayes F, Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 2009. Chronic exposure to increasing Background ozone impairs stomatal functioning in grassland species. Global Change Biology 15: 1522-1533.
45. Mills G, Pleijel H, Büker P, et al. 2010. Mapping critical levels for vegetation. Revision undertaken in Summer 2010 to include new flux-based critical levels and response functions for ozone, in: Mapping Manual 2004. International Cooperative Programme on Effects of Air Pollution on Natural Vegetation and Crops. http://icpvegetation.ceh.ac.uk/manuals/mapping-manual. html.
46. Nunn AJ, Reiter IM, Häberle K-H, et al. 2002. 'Free-air' ozone canopy fumigation in an old-growth mixed forest: concept and observations in beech. Phyton 42: 105-119.
47. Oksanen E. 2003. Responses of selected birch (Betula pendula Roth) clones to ozone change over time. Plant, Cell and Environment 26: 875-886.
48. Oksanen E, Kontunen-Soppela S, Riikonen J, Peltonen P, Uddling J, Vapaavuori E. 2007. Northern environment predisposes birches to ozone damage. Plant Biology 9: 191-196.
49. Ollinger SV, Aber JD, Reich PB. 1997. Simulating ozone effects on forest productivity: interactions among leaf-, canopy-, and stand-level processes. Ecological Applications 7: 1237-1251.
50. Omasa K, Abo F, Natori T, TotsukaT. 1979. Studies of air pollutant sorption by plants. (II) Sorption under fumigation with NO2, O3 or NO2 + O3. Journal of Agricultural Meteorology 35: 77-83 (in Japanese with English summary).
51. Oren R, Sperry JS, Katul GG, et al. 1999. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant, Cell and Environment 22: 1515-1526.
52. Paoletti E. 2005. Ozone slows stomatal response to light and leaf wounding in a Mediterranean evergreen broadleaf, Arbutus unedo. Environmental Pollution 134: 439-445.
53. Reich PB. 1987. Quantifying plant response to ozone: a unifying theory. Tree Physiology 3: 63-91.
54. Reiling K, Davison AW. 1995. Effects of ozone on stomatal conductance and photosynthesis in populations of Plantago major L. New Phytologist 129: 587-594.
55. Robinson MF, Heath J, Mansfield TA. 1998. Disturbance in stomatal behavior caused by air pollutants. Journal of Experimental Botany 49: 461-469.
56. Sitch S, Cox PM, Collins WJ, Huntingford C. 2007. Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. Nature 448: 791-795.
57. Skäby L, Troeng E, Boström CA. 1987. Ozone uptake and effects on transpiration, net photosynthesis, and dark respiration in Scots pine. Forest Science 33: 801-808.
58. Tausz M, Grulke NE, Wieser G. 2007. Defense and avoidance of ozone under global change. Environmental Pollution 147: 525-531.
59. Taylor GEJr. 1978. Plant and leaf resistance to gaseous air pollution stress. New Phytologist 80: 523-534.
60. Terashima I. 2002. Photosynthesis at leaf and individual level. In: Sato K. ed. Photosynthesis. Asakura: Tokyo, 125-149 (in Japanese).
61. Torsethaugen G, Pell EJ, Assmann SM. 1999. Ozone inhibits guard cell K + channels implicated in stomatal opening. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 12577-12582.
62. Uddling J, Teclaw RM, Pregitzer KS, Ellsworth DS. 2009. Leaf and canopy conductance in aspen and aspen-birch forests under free-air enrichment of carbon dioxide and ozone. Tree Physiology 29: 1367-1380.
63. Umemoto-Mori M, Izuta T, Koike T. 1998. Application of simple infiltration method for evaluating stomatal patchiness in beech leaves treated with O3 and high CO2. Forest Resources Environment 36: 19-25.
64. Vahisalu T, Puzorjova I, Brosche M, et al. 2010. Ozone-triggered rapid stomatal response involves the production of reactive oxygen species, and is controlled by SLAC1 and OST1. The Plant Journal 62: 442-453.
65. Vingarzan R. 2004. A review of surface ozone Background levels and trends. Atmospheric Environment 38: 3431-3442.
66. Volz A, Kley D. 1988. Evaluation of the Montsouris series of ozone measurements made in the nineteenth century. Nature 332: 240-242.
67. Watanabe M, Watanabe Y, Kitaoka S, Utsugi H, Kita K, Koike T. 2011. Growth and photosynthetic traits of hybrid larch F1 (Larix gmelinii var. japonica × L. kaempferi) under elevated CO2 concentration with lownutrient availability. Tree Physiology 31: 965-975.
68. Watanabe M, Hoshika Y, Inada N, Wang X, Mao Q, Koike T. 2013a. Photosynthetic traits of Siebold's beech and oak saplings grown under free air ozone exposure. Environmental Pollution 174: 50-56.
69. Watanabe M, Hoshika Y, Inada N, Koike T. 2013b. Canopy carbon budget of Siebold's beech (Fagus crenata) sapling under free air ozone exposure. Environmental Pollution in press. doi:10. 1016/j. envpol. 2013. 04. 018.
70. Weber JA, Clark CS, Hogsett WE. 1993. Analysis of the relationships among O3 uptake, conductance, and photosynthesis in needles of Pinus ponderosa. Tree Physiology 13: 157-172.
71. Werner H, Fabian P. 2002. Free-air fumigation of mature trees: a novel system for controlled ozone enrichment in grown-up beech and spruce canopies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 9: 117-121.
72. Wieser G, Havranek WM. 1995. Environmental control of ozone uptake in Larix decidua Mill. : a comparison between different altitudes. Tree Physiology 15: 253-258.
73. Wieser G, Tegischer K, Tausz M, Häberle K-H, Grams TEE, Matyssek R. 2002. Age effects on Norway spruce (Picea abies) susceptibility to ozone uptake: novel approach relating stress avoidance to defense. Tree Physiology 22: 583-590.
74. Wilkinson S, DaviesW. 2010. Drought, ozone, ABAand ethylene: newinsights from cell to plant community. Plant, Cell and Environment 33: 510-525.
75. Wittig VE, Ainsworth EA, Long SP. 2007. To what extent do current and projected increases in surface ozone affect photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of trees? A meta-analytic review of the last 3 decades of experiments. Plant, Cell and Environment 30: 1150-1162.
76. Yamaguchi M, Watanabe M, Iwasaki M, et al. 2007. Growth and photosynthetic responses ofFagus crenata seedlings toO3 under different nitrogen loads. Trees 21: 707-718
77. Yonekura T, HondaY, Oksanen E, et al. 2001. The influences of ozone and soil water stress, singlyand in combination, on leaf gas exchange rates, leaf ultrastructural characteristics and annual ring width of Fagus crenata seedlings. Journal of the Japan Society of Atmospheric Environment 36: 333-351.