Subglandular breast augmentation with textured, anatomic, cohesive silicone implants: A review of 440 consecutive patients

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 295-303

  Lista, Frank ^a,b,c   Tutino, Roberto ^a,b,c   Khan, Adeel ^a,b,c   Ahmad, Jamil ^a,b,c  

^a Plastic Surgery Clinic   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SILICONE GEL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CHEMICALLY INDUCED DISORDER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FACTUAL DATABASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANT CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; LARGE CELL LYMPHOMA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMPLANT CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; LYMPHOMA, LARGE-CELL, ANAPLASTIC; MAMMAPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SILICONE GELS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881480317     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958a6d     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Spear SL, Hedén P. Allergan's silicone gel breast implants. Expert Rev Med Devices 2007;4:699-708.
2. Brown MH, Shenker R, Silver SA. Cohesive silicone gel breast implants in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:768-779; discussion 780.
3. Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D. Soft cohesive silicone gel breast prostheses: A comparative prospective study of aesthetic results versus lower cohesivity silicone gel prostheses. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60:482-489.
4. Spear SL, Bulan EJ, Venturi ML. Breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006; 118(7 Suppl): 188S-196S.
5. Regnault P. Breast ptosis: Definition and treatment. Clin Plast Surg. 1976;3:193-203.
6. Baeke JL. Breast deformity caused by anatomical or teardrop implant rotation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2555-2564; discussion 2568.
7. Schots JM, Fechner MR, Hoogbergen MM, van Tits HW. Malrotation of the McGhan Style 510 prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:261-265.
8. Hall-Findlay EJ. Breast implant complication review: Double capsules and late seromas. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:56-66.
9. Bengtson B, Brody GS, Brown MH, et al..; Late Periprosthetic Fluid Collection after Breast Implant Working Group. Managing late periprosthetic fluid collections (seroma) in patients with breast implants: A consensus panel recommendation and review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:1-7.
10. Maxwell GP, Brown MH, Oefelein MG, Kaplan HM, Hedén P. Clinical considerations regarding the risks and benefits of textured surface implants and double capsule. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:593-595.
11. Spear SL, Rottman SJ, Glicksman C, Brown M, Al-Attar A. Late seromas after breast implants: Theory and practice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:423-435.
12. Jewell M, Spear SL, Largent J, Oefelein MG, Adams WP Jr. Anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma and breast implants: A review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:651-661.
13. Kim B, Roth C, Chung KC, et al.. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implants: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2141-2150.
14. Kim B, Roth C, Young VL, et al.. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implants: Results from a structured expert consultation process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:629-639.
15. Taylor KO, Webster HR, Prince HM. Anaplastic large cell lymphoma and breast implants: Five Australian cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:610e-617e.
16. Tebbetts JB. Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1453-1457.
17. Hedén P, Boné B, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS. Style 410 cohesive silicone breast implants: Safety and effectiveness at 5 to 9 years after implantation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1281-1287.
18. Hedén P, Bronz G, Elberg JJ, et al.. Long-term safety and effectiveness of style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implants. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:430-436; discussion 437.
19. Bengtson BP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Maxwell GP; Style 410 U.S. Core Clinical Study Group. Style 410 highly cohesive silicone breast implant core study results at 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):40S-48S.
20. Maxwell GP, Van Natta BW, Murphy DK, et al.. Natrelle style 410 form-stable silicone breast implants: Core study results at 6 years. Aesthet Surg J. 2012;32:709-717.
21. Cunningham B. The Mentor core study on silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):19S-29S; discussion 30S-32S. E-published ahead of print December 27, 2007.
22. Cunningham B. The Mentor study on Contour Profile gel silicone MemoryGel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):33S-39S.
23. Spear SL, Murphy DK, Slicton A, Walker PS; Inamed Silicone Breast Implant U.S. Study Group. Inamed silicone breast implant core study results at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007;120(7 Suppl 1):8S-16S; discussion 17S.
24. Hammond DC, Migliori MM, Caplin DA, Garcia ME, Phillips CA. Mentor Contour Profile(R) gel implants: Clinical outcomes at 6 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1381-1391. E-published ahead of print February 14, 2012.
25. Cunningham B, McCue J. Safety and effectiveness of Mentor's MemoryGel implants at 6 years. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009;33:440-444.
26. Schaub TA, Ahmad J, Rohrich RJ. Capsular contracture with breast implants in the cosmetic patient: Saline versus silicone-A systematic review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:2140-2149.
27. Barnsley GP, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: A metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2182-2190.
28. Wong CH, Samuel M, Tan BK, Song C. Capsular contracture in subglandular breast augmentation with textured versus smooth breast implants: A systematic review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:1224-1236.
29. Pajkos A, Deva AK, Vickery K, Cope C, Chang L, Cossart YE. Detection of subclinical infection in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111:1605-1611.
30. Adams WP Jr, Rios JL, Smith SJ. Enhancing patient outcomes in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery using triple antibiotic breast irrigation: Six-year prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(7 Suppl):46S-52S.
31. Adams WP Jr. Capsular contracture: What is it? What causes it? How can it be prevented and managed? Clin Plast Surg. 2009;36:119-126, vii.
32. Bronz G. A comparison of naturally shaped and round implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2002;22:238-246.
33. Friedman T, Davidovitch N, Scheflan M. Comparative double blind clinical study on round versus shaped cohesive gel implants. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:530-536.
34. Macadam SA, Ho AL, Lennox PA, Pusic AL. Patient-reported satisfaction and health related quality of life following breast reconstruction: A comparison of shaped cohesive gel and round cohesive gel implant recipients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:431-441. E-published ahead of print November 8, 2012.
35. Mazzocchi M, Dessy LA, Carlesimo B, Marchetti F, Scuderi N. Late seroma formation after breast surgery with textured silicone implants: A problem worth bearing in mind. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:176e-177e.
36. Pinchuk V, Tymofii O. Seroma as a late complication after breast augmentation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:303-314.
37. Eaves FF, Haeck PC, Rohrich RJ. Breast implants and anaplastic large cell lymphoma: Using science to guide our patients and plastic surgeons worldwide. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2501-2503.