Effects of multi-modal guidance for the acquisition of sight reading skills: A case study with simple drum sequences

2013 World Haptics Conference, WHC 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 571-576

  Lee, In ^a   Choi, Seungmoon ^a  

^a Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

H.5.2 Information Interface and Presentation : User Interfaces Haptic I O; K.3.1 Computers and Education : Computer Uses in Education Computer assisted instruction

Indexed keywords

COMPLETION TIME; COMPUTER USE; GUIDANCE CUES; INFORMATION INTERFACES; LEARNING METHODS; READING SKILLS; STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE; UNIVERSITY STUDENTS;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; E-LEARNING; HAPTIC INTERFACES;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84881460850     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WHC.2013.6548471     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. A. D. Baddeley. Human Memory: Theory and Practice. Psychology Press, 1997.
2. K. Bark, P. Khanna, R. Irwin, P. Kapur, S. A. Jax, L. J. Buxbaum, and K. J. Kuchenbecker. Lessons in Using Vibrotactile Feedback to Guide Fast Arm Motions. In Proc. of the IEEE World Haptics Conference, pages 355-360, 2011.
3. A. Bloomfield and N. I. Badler. Virtual Training via Vibrotactile Arrays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 17(2):103-120, 2008.
4. D. Feygin, M. Keehner, and F. Tendick. Haptic Guidance: Experimental Evaluation of a Haptic Training Method for a Perceptual Motor Skill. In Proc. of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, pages 40-47, 2002.
5. G. Grindlay. Haptic Guidance Benefits Musical Motor Learning. In Proc. of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, pages 397-404, 2008.
6. H. R. Gudmundsdottir. Advances in Music-reading Research. Music Education Research, 12(2):331-338, 2010.
7. S. Holland, A. J. Bouwer, M. Dalgleish, and T. M. Hurtig. Feeling the Beat Where it Counts: Fostering Multi-Limb Rhythm Skills with the Haptic Drum Kit. In Proc. of the ACM International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction, pages 21-28, 2010.
8. K. Huang, T. Starner, E. Do, G. Weiberg, D. Kohlsdorf, C. Ahlrichs, and L. Ruediger. Mobile Music Touch: Mobile Tactile Stimulation for Passive Learning. In Proc. of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 791-800, 2010.
9. J. C. Huegel and M. K. O'Malley. Progressive Haptic and Visual Guidane for Training in a Virtual Dynamic Task. In Proc. of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, pages 343-349, 2010.
10. R. Kopiez and J. I. Lee. Towards a General Model of Skills Involved in Sight Reading Music. Music Education Research, 10(1):41-62, 2008.
11. E. C. Lechelt. Temporal Numerosity Discrimination: Intermodal Comparisons Revisited. British Journal of Psychology, 66(1):101-108, 1975.
12. I. Lee, K. Hong, and S. Choi. Guidance Methods for Bimanual Timing Tasks. In Proc. of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, pages 297-300, 2012.
13. J. Lee and S. Choi. Effects of Haptic Guidance and Disturbance on Motor Learning: Potential Advantage of Haptic Disturbance. In Proc. of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, pages 335-342, 2010.
14. J. Lieberman and C. Breazeal. TIKL: Development of a Wearable Vibrotactile Feedback Suit for Improved Human Motor Learning. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):919-926, 2007.
15. R. A. Magill. Motor Learning: Concepts and Applications. McGraw-Hill, 6th edition, 2001.
16. L. Marchal-Crespo and D. J. Reinkensmeyer. Review of Control Strategies for Robotic Movement Training after Neurologic Injury. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 6(20), 2009.
17. G. Park and S. Choi. Perceptual Space of Amplitude-Modulated Vibrotactile Stimuli. In Proc. of the IEEE World Haptics Conference, pages 59-64, 2011.
18. L. J. Post, I. C. Zompa, and C. E. Chapman. Perception of Vibrotactile Stimuli During Motor Activity in Human Subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 100(1):107-120, 1994.
19. D. Powell and M. K. O'Mally. The Task-Dependent Efficacy of Shared-Control Haptic Guidance Paradigms. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5(3):208-219, 2012.
20. R. A. Schmidt. Frequent Augmented Feedback Can Degrade Learning: Evidence and Interpretations. Tutorials in Motor Neuroscience, pages 59-75, 1991.
21. P. Shull, K. Lurie, M. Shin, T. Besier, and M. Cutkosky. Haptic Gait Retraining for Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment. In Proc. of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, pages 409-416, 2010.
22. D. Spelmezan, M. Jacobs, A. Hilgers, and J. Borchers. Tactile Motion Instructions for Physical Activities. In Proc. of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2243-2252, 2009.
23. E. Todorov, R. Shadmehr, and E. Bizzi. Augmented Feedback Presented in a Virtual Environment Accelerates Learning of a Difficult Motor Task. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29(2):147-158, 1997.
24. J. van der Linden, R. Johnson, J. Bird, Y. Rogers, and E. Schoonderwaldt. Buzzing to Play: Lessons Learned From an In the Wild Study of Real-time Vibrotactile Feedback. In Proc. of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 533-542, 2011.
25. J. Watanabe and H. Ando. Pace-sync Shoes: Intuitive Walking-pace Guidance Based on Cyclic Vibro-tactile Stimulation for the Foot. Virtual Reality, 14(3):213-219, 2010.
26. C. J. Winstein and R. A. Schmidt. Reduced Frequency of Knowledge of Results Enhances Motor Skill Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 16(4):677-691, 1990.