Erratum: Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina (Nature (2013) 500 (168-174) DOI:10.1038/nature12346));Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina

Nature

Volumn 500, Issue 7461, 2013, Pages 168-174

  Helmstaedter, Moritz ^a,c   Briggman, Kevin L ^a,d   Turaga, Srinivas C ^b,e   Jain, Viren ^b,f   Seung, H Sebastian ^b   Denk, Winfried ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF NEUROBIOLOGY   (Germany)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^f HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; CYTOLOGY; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA INTERPRETATION; EYE; FUNCTIONAL ROLE; IMAGING METHOD; MAP; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NEUROLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RECONSTRUCTION; RODENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; CONNECTOME; CONTACT EXAMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENDRITE; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; GANGLION; INTERNEURON; MACHINE LEARNING; MAMMAL; MOTION; MOUSE; NERVE CELL; NERVE FIBER; NEURITE; NEUROPIL; NONHUMAN; PHOTORECEPTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA AMACRINE CELL; RETINA INNER PLEXIFORM LAYER; SYNAPSE VESICLE; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

MAMMALIA;

EID: 84881453258     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature13877     Document Type: Erratum

References (51)

1. White, J. G., Southgate, E., Thomson, J. N.& Brenner, S. Thestructure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 314, 1-340 (1986).
2. Varshney, L. R., Chen, B. L., Paniagua, E., Hall, D. H. & Chklovskii, D. B. Structural properties of the Caenorhabditis elegans neuronal network. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001066 (2011).
3. Binzegger, T., Douglas, R. J. & Martin, K. A. C. A quantitative mapof the circuit of cat primary visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 24, 8441-8453 (2004).
4. Helmstaedter, M., de Kock, C. P., Feldmeyer, D., Bruno, R. M. & Sakmann, B. Reconstruction of an average cortical columnin silico. Brain Res. Rev. 55, 193-203 (2007).
5. Briggman, K. L., Helmstaedter, M. & Denk, W. Wiring specificity in the directionselectivity circuit of the retina. Nature 471, 183-188 (2011).
6. Stepanyants, A. & Chklovskii, D. B. Neurogeometry and potential synaptic connectivity. Trends Neurosci. 28, 387-394 (2005).
7. Mishchenko, Y. et al. Ultrastructural analysis of hippocampal neuropil from the connectomics perspective. Neuron 67, 1009-1020 (2010).
8. Hill, S. L., Wang, Y., Riachi, I., Schurmann, F. & Markram, H. Statistical connectivity provides a sufficient foundation for specific functional connectivity in neocortical neural microcircuits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2885-E2894 (2012).
9. Denk, W., Briggman, K. L.&Helmstaedter, M. Structural neurobiology: missing link to a mechanistic understanding of neural computation. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 13, 351-358 (2012).
10. Peters, A. Thalamic input to the cerebral cortex. Trends Neurosci. 2, 183-185 (1979).
11. Markram, H., Lubke, J., Frotscher, M., Roth, A. & Sakmann, B. Physiology and anatomy of synaptic connections between thick tufted pyramidal neurones in the developing rat neocortex. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 500, 409-440 (1997).
12. Fried, S. I., Munch, T. A. & Werblin, F. S. Mechanisms and circuitry underlying directional selectivity in the retina. Nature 420, 411-414 (2002).
13. Asari, H. & Meister, M. Divergence of visual channels in the inner retina. Nature Neurosci. 15, 1581-1589 (2012).
14. Stevens, J. K., Davis, T. L., Friedman, N. & Sterling, P. A systematic approach to reconstructing microcircuitry by electron microscopy of serial sections. Brain Res. 2, 265-293 (1980).
15. Sterling, P. Microcircuitry of the cat retina. Annu. Rev.Neurosci. 6, 149-185(1983).
16. Famiglietti, E. V. Synaptic organization of starburst amacrine cells in rabbit retina: analysis of serial thin sections by electron microscopy and graphic reconstruction. J. Comp. Neurol. 309, 40-70 (1991).
17. McGuire, B. A., Stevens, J. K. & Sterling, P. Microcircuitry of bipolar cells in cat retina. J. Neurosci. 4, 2920-2938 (1984).
18. Briggman, K. L. & Bock, D. D. Volume electron microscopy for neuronal circuit reconstruction. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 154-161 (2012).
19. Masland, R. H. The neuronal organization of the retina. Neuron 76, 266-280 (2012).
20. Vaney, D. I., Sivyer, B. & Taylor, W. R. Direction selectivity in the retina: symmetry and asymmetry in structure and function. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 13, 194-208 (2012).
21. Euler, T., Detwiler, P. B. & Denk, W. Directionally selective calcium signals in dendrites of starburst amacrine cells. Nature 418, 845-852 (2002).
22. Zhou, Z. J. & Lee, S. Synaptic physiology of direction selectivity in the retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 586, 4371-4376 (2008).
23. Wei, W., Hamby, A. M., Zhou, K. & Feller, M. B. Development of asymmetric inhibition underlying direction selectivity in the retina. Nature 469, 402-406 (2011).
24. Denk, W. & Horstmann, H. Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy to reconstruct three-dimensional tissue nanostructure. PLoS Biol. 2, e329 (2004).
25. Helmstaedter, M., Briggman, K. L.&Denk, W. High-accuracyneurite reconstruction for high-throughput neuroanatomy. Nature Neurosci. 14, 1081-1088 (2011).
26. Jain, V. et al.Supervised learning of image restoration with convolutional networks. IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision 2, 1-8 (2007).
27. Turaga, S. C. et al. Convolutional networks can learn to generate affinity graphs for image segmentation. Neural Comput. 22, 511-538 (2010).
28. Wässle, H., Puller, C., Muller, F. & Haverkamp, S. Cone contacts, mosaics, and territories of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 29, 106-117 (2009).
29. Amthor, F. R., Oyster, C. W. & Takahashi, E. S. Morphology of on-off directionselective ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. Brain Res. 298, 187-190 (1984).
30. Strettoi, E., Raviola, E. & Dacheux, R. F. Synaptic connections of the narrow-field, bistratified rod amacrine cell (AII) in the rabbit retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 325, 152-168 (1992).
31. Macneil, M. A., Heussy, J. K., Dacheux, R. F., Raviola, E. & Masland, R. H. The shapes and numbers of amacrine cells: matching of photofilled with Golgi-stained cells in the rabbit retina and comparison with other mammalian species. J. Comp. Neurol. 413, 305-326 (1999).
32. Fyk-Kolodziej, B. & Pourcho, R. G. Differential distribution of hyperpolarizationactivated and cyclic nucleotide-gated channels in cone bipolar cells of the rat retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 501, 891-903 (2007).
33. Wassle, H.&Riemann, H. J.Mosaic of nerve-cells inmammalian retina. Proc.R. Soc. Lond. B 200, 441-461 (1978).
34. Kim, I. J., Zhang, Y., Meister, M. & Sanes, J. R. Laminar restriction of retinal ganglion cell dendrites and axons: subtype-specific developmental patterns revealed with transgenic markers. J. Neurosci. 30, 1452-1462 (2010).
35. Levick, W. R. Receptive fields and trigger features of ganglion cells in the visual streak of the rabbits retina. J. Physiol. (Lond.) 188, 285-307 (1967).
36. Amthor, F. R., Takahashi, E. S. & Oyster, C. W. Morphologies of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with complex receptive fields. J. Comp. Neurol. 280, 97-121 (1989).
37. Kolb, H., Nelson, R. & Mariani, A. Amacrine cells, bipolar cells and ganglion cells of the cat retina: a Golgi study. Vision Res. 21, 1081-1114 (1981).
38. Sivyer, B., Venkataramani, S., Taylor, W. R. & Vaney, D. I. A novel type of complex ganglion cell in rabbit retina. J. Comp. Neurol. 519, 3128-3138 (2011).
39. Siegert, S. et al. Genetic address book for retinal cell types. Nature Neurosci. 12, 1197-1204 (2009).
40. Badea, T. C. & Nathans, J. Quantitative analysis of neuronal morphologies in the mouse retina visualized by using a genetically directed reporter. J. Comp. Neurol. 480, 331-351 (2004).
41. Joo, H. R., Peterson, B. B., Haun, T. J. & Dacey, D. M. Characterization of a novel large-field cone bipolar cell type in the primate retina: evidence for selective cone connections. Vis. Neurosci. 28, 29-37 (2011).
42. Seung, H.S. Readingthe book ofmemory: sparse samplingversusdensemapping of connectomes. Neuron 62, 17-29 (2009).
43. Masland, R. H. The fundamental plan of the retina. Nature Neurosci. 4, 877-886 (2001).
44. Andres, B. et al. in Computer Vision - ECCV 2012 Lecture Notes in Computer Science (eds Fitzgibbon, A. et al.) 778-791 (Springer, 2012).
45. Tsukamoto, Y., Morigiwa, K., Ueda, M. & Sterling, P. Microcircuits for night vision in mouse retina. J. Neurosci. 21, 8616-8623 (2001).
46. Calkins, D. J. & Sterling, P. Microcircuitry for two types of achromatic ganglion cell in primate fovea. J. Neurosci. 27, 2646-2653 (2007).
47. Zhang, Y., Kim, I. J., Sanes, J. R.&Meister, M. Themost numerous ganglion cell type of the mouse retina is a selective feature detector. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, E2391-E2398 (2012).
48. Ölveczky, B. P., Baccus, S. A. & Meister, M. Segregation of object and background motion in the retina. Nature 423, 401-408 (2003).
49. Turaga, S. C., Briggman, K., Helmstaedter, M., Denk, W. & Seung, H. S. Maximin affinity learning of image segmentation.Adv. Neural Info. Proc. Syst. 22, 1-8 (2009).
50. Studer, D. & Gnaegi, H. Minimal compression of ultrathin sections with use of an oscillating diamond knife. J. Microsc. 197, 94-100 (2000).
51. Binding, J., Mikula, S.&Denk, W. Low-dosagemaximum-a-posteriori focusingand stigmation. Microsc. Microanal. 19, 38-55 (2013).