Effects of improved patient participation in primary care on health-related outcomes: A systematic review

Family Practice

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 365-378

  Sanders, Ariëtte R J ^a   van Weeghel, Inge ^b   Vogelaar, Maartje ^c   Verheul, William ^d   Pieters, Ron H M ^a   de Wit, Niek J ^a   Bensing, Jozien M ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b ST JANSDAL HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^c Rivierduinen Centre for Mental Health   (Netherlands)

^d NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Patient participation; Patient oriented outcomes; Primary health care; Review (publication type); Shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITY CONTROL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-ORIENTED OUTCOMES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REVIEW (PUBLICATION TYPE).; SHARED DECISION-MAKING;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84881325383     PISSN: 02632136     EISSN: 14602229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmt014     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. NIVEL, Netherlands institute for health services and research. Incidentie- en prevalentiecijfers in de huisartsenpraktijk; incidentie alle symptomen en klachten ICPC (R01-R29). Afkomstig uit LINH. 2012. http://www.nivel.nl/incidentie-en-prevalentiecijfers- in-de-huisartsenpraktijk (accessed on 22 June 2012).
2. Biondi DM. Physical treatments for headache: a structured review. Headache 2005; 45: 738-46.
3. Montgomery P, Dennis J. Cognitive behavioural interventions for sleep problems in adults aged 60+. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 1: CD003161.
4. Di Blasi Z, Harkness E, Ernst E, Georgiou A, Kleijnen J. Influence of context effects on health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet 2001; 357: 757-62.
5. Enck P, Horing B, Weimer K, Klosterhalfen S. Placebo responses and placebo effects in functional bowel disorders. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 24: 1-8.
6. Jellema P, van der Windt DA, van der Horst HE, Twisk JW, Stalman WA, Bouter LM. Should treatment of (sub)acute low back pain be aimed at psychosocial prognostic factors? Cluster randomised clinical trial in general practice. BMJ 2005; 331: 84.
7. van der Windt DA, Kuijpers T, Jellema P, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM. Do psychological factors predict outcome in both low-back pain and shoulder pain?.Ann Rheum Dis 2007; 66: 313-9.
8. Khan AA, Khan A, Harezlak J, Tu W, Kroenke K. Somatic symptoms in primary care: etiology and outcome. Psychosomatics 2003; 44: 471-8.
9. Ursin H, Eriksen H. Cognitive activation theory of stress, sensitization, and common health complaints. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2007; 1113: 304-10.
10. Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. CMAJ 1995; 152: 1423-33.
11. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Thomas H. The role of expectancies in the placebo effect and their use in the delivery of health care: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3: 1-96.
12. Ong LM, de Haes JC, Hoos AM, Lammes FB. Doctor-patient communication: a review of the literature. Soc Sci Med 1995; 40: 903-18.
13. Towle A, Godolphin W. Framework for teaching and learning informed shared decision making. BMJ 1999; 319: 766-71.
14. Elwyn G, Hutchings H, Edwards A et al. The OPTION scale: measuring the extent that clinicians involve patients in decisionmaking tasks. Health Expect 2005; 8: 34-42.
15. Bensing JM, Verheul W. The silent healer: the role of communication in placebo effects. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 80: 293-9.
16. Mechanic D, Meyer S. Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51: 657-68.
17. Thomas KB. General practice consultations: is there any point in being positive?.Br Med J 1987; 294: 1200-2.
18. Knipschild P, Arntz A. Pain patients in a randomized trial did not show a significant effect of a positive consultation. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 708-13.
19. Lewin SA, Skea ZC, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; 4: CD003267.
20. Rockenbauch K, Schildmann J. Shared decision making (SDM): a systematic survey of terminology use and concepts. Gesundheitswesen 2011; 73: 399-408.
21. Weston WW. Informed and shared decision-making: the crux of patient-centered care. CMAJ 2001; 165: 438-9.
22. Joosten EA, DeFuentes-Merillas L, de Weert GH, Sensky T, van der Staak CP, de Jong CA. Systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making on patient satisfaction, treatment adherence and health status. Psychother Psychosom 2008; 77: 219-26.
23. Légaré F, Turcotte S, Stacey D, Ratté S, Kryworuchko J, Graham ID. Patients' perceptions of sharing in decisions: a systematic review of interventions to enhance shared decision making in routine clinical practice. Patient 2012; 5: 1-19.
24. Légaré F, Bekker H, Desroches S et al. Effective continuing professional development for translating shared decision making in primary care: A study protocol. Implement Sci 2010; 5: 83.
25. O'Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3: CD001431.
26. Ebell MH, Siwek J, Weiss BD et al. Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature. J Fam Pract 2004; 53: 111-20.
27. Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Luke DA. Shaping the context of health: a review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health 2006; 27: 341-70.
28. Kinmonth AL, Woodcock A, Griffin S, Spiegal N, Campbell MJ. Randomised controlled trial of patient centred care of diabetes in general practice: impact on current wellbeing and future disease risk. The Diabetes Care From Diagnosis Research Team. BMJ 1998; 317: 1202-8.
29. Pill R, Stott NC, Rollnick SR, Rees M. A randomized controlled trial of an intervention designed to improve the care given in general practice to Type II diabetic patients: patient outcomes and professional ability to change behaviour. Fam Pract 1998; 15: 229-35.
30. Krones T, Keller H, Sönnichsen A et al. Absolute cardiovascular disease risk and shared decision making in primary care: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2008; 6: 218-27.
31. Loh A, Simon D, Wills CE, Kriston L, Niebling W, Härter M. The effects of a shared decision-making intervention in primary care of depression: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 67: 324-32.
32. Cooper LA, Roter DL, Carson KA et al. A randomized trial to improve patient-centered care and hypertension control in underserved primary care patients. J Gen Intern Med 2011; 26: 1297-304.
33. Légaré F, Labrecque M, Cauchon M, Castel J, Turcotte S, Grimshaw J. Training family physicians in shared decision-making to reduce the overuse of antibiotics in acute respiratory infections: a cluster randomized trial. CMAJ 2012; 184: E726-34.
34. Chassany O, Boureau F, Liard F et al. Effects of training on general practitioners' management of pain in osteoarthritis: a randomized multicenter study. J Rheumatol 2006; 33: 1827-34.
35. Kinmonth AL, Spiegal N, Woodcock A. Developing a training programme in patient-centred consulting for evaluation in a randomised controlled trial; diabetes care from diagnosis in British primary care. Patient Educ Couns 1996; 29: 75-86.
36. Salzburg Global Seminar. Salzburg statement on shared decision making. BMJ 2011; 342: d1745.
37. Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, Gillard S, Grant J, Stewart M. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2004; 2: 595-608.
38. Entwistle VA, Watt IS. Patient involvement in treatment decisionmaking: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Educ Couns 2006; 63: 268-78.
39. Edwards A, Elwyn G. Involving patients in decision making and communicating risk: a longitudinal evaluation of doctors' attitudes and confidence during a randomized trial. J Eval Clin Pract 2004; 10: 431-7.
40. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 1995; 153: 1423-31.
41. Lee RG, Garvin T. Moving from information transfer to information exchange in health and health care. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 449-64.
42. Gysels M, Richardson A, Higginson IJ. Communication training for health professionals who care for patients with cancer: a systematic review of training methods. Support Care Cancer 2005; 13: 356-66.
43. Stewart-Williams S, Podd J. The placebo effect: dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate. Psychol Bull 2004; 130: 324-40.
44. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Hood K et al. Achieving involvement: process outcomes from a cluster randomized trial of shared decision making skill development and use of risk communication aids in general practice. Fam Pract 2004; 21: 337-46.
45. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000; 321: 694-6.
46. Caldwell PH, Hamilton S, Tan A, Craig JC. Strategies for increasing recruitment to randomised controlled trials: systematic review. PLoS Med 2010; 7: e1000368.
47. Treweek S, Pitkethly M, Cook J et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; 4: MR000013.
48. van der Wouden JC, Blankenstein AH, Huibers MJ, van der Windt DA, Stalman WA, Verhagen AP. Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna's law holds in Dutch primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 819-24.
49. Soares HP, Daniels S, Kumar A et al. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. BMJ 2004; 328: 22-4.
50. Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients' Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med 1990; 5: 29-33.
51. Man-Son-Hing M, Laupacis A, O'Connor AM et al. A patient decision aid regarding antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 1999; 282: 737-43.
52. Krones T, Keller H, Sönnichsen AC, Sadowski EM, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N. Partizipative Entscheidungsfindung in der Cardiovasculären Risicoprävention: Ergebnisse der Pilotstudie von ARRIBA-Hertz, einer consultationbezogenen Entscheidungshilfe für die allgemeinmedizinische Praxis [Shared decision-making in cardiovasculair prevention: results from the pilotting of ARRIBA-Herz, a transactional decision aid for general practice]. Z Med Psychol 2006; 15: 61-70.
53. Loh A, Leonhart R, Wills CE, Simon D, Härter M. The impact of patient participation on adherence and clinical outcome in primary care of depression. Patient Educ Couns 2007; 65: 69-78.
54. Strull WM, Lo B, Charles G. Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?.JAMA 1984; 252: 2990-4.
55. Melbourne E, Roberts S, Durand MA, Newcombe R, Légaré F, Elwyn G. Dyadic OPTION: Measuring perceptions of shared decision-making in practice. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 83: 55-7.
56. Melbourne E, Sinclair K, Durand MA, Légaré F, Elwyn G. Developing a dyadic OPTION scale to measure perceptions of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2010; 78: 177-83.
57. Bradley C (ed.). Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Management. Chur, Zwitserland: Harwood Academic, 1994.
58. López Alonso SR, Martínez Sánchez CM, Romero Cañadillas AB, Navarro Casado F, González Rojo J. Metric properties of WOMAC questionnaires-original and reduced versions-to measure symptoms and Physical Functional Disability. Aten Primaria 2009; 41: 613-20.
59. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996; 34: 220-33.
60. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473-83.