Isolated aortic valve replacement in patients with small aortic annulus-a high-risk group on long-term follow-up

Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 379-385

  Wilbring, Manuel ^a   Alexiou, Konstantin ^a   Schumann, Elisabeth ^a   Matschke, Klaus ^a   Tugtekin, Semsmalte ^a  

^a University Heart Center Dresden   (Germany)

Author keywords

aortic valve replacement; Mitroflow; patient prosthesis mismatch; small annulus

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; AORTA DISEASE; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; LONG TERM SURVIVAL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; SMALL AORTIC ANNULUS; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; BIOPROSTHESIS; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84881315507     PISSN: 01716425     EISSN: 14391902     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1331577     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Gummert J F., Funkat A. K., Beckmann A., et Al. Cardiac Surgery in Germany during 2010: A Report on Behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2011; 59 5 259 267
2. Otto C. M., Pearlman A. S., Gardner C. L. Hemodynamic progression of aortic stenosis in adults assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol: 1989; 13 3 545 550 (Pubitemid 19073920)
3. Davies S. W., Gershlick A. H., Balcon R. Progression of valvar aortic stenosis: a long-term retrospective study. Eur Heart J: 1991; 12 1 10 14
4. Rahimtoola S. H. The problem of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch. Circulation: 1978; 58 1 20 24 (Pubitemid 8376654)
5. Bleiziffer S., Ali A., Hettich I. M., et al. Impact of the indexed effective orifice area on mid-term cardiac-related mortality after aortic valve replacement. Heart: 2010; 96 11 865 871
6. Howell N. J., Keogh B. E., Barnet V., et al. Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg: 2006; 30 1 10 14 (Pubitemid 43850318)
7. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J. G. Prevention of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch before aortic valve replacement: does it matter and is it feasible? Heart: 2007; 93 5 549 551 (Pubitemid 46707103)
8. Carrier M., Pellerin M., Perrault L. P., et al. Experience with the 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly. Ann Thorac Surg: 2001; 71 (5, Suppl): S249 S252 (Pubitemid 32436972)
9. Hartrumpf M., Kuehnel R., Erb M., Loladze G., Mueller T., Albes J. Favorable gradients with the mitroflow aortic valve prosthesis in everyday surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2012; 60 5 326 333
10. Bhutani A. K., Dev K., Gupta C. H., Abraham K. A., Desai R. N., Balakrishnan K. R. Aortic root enlargement by Manouguian's technique. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 1994; 108 4 788 (Pubitemid 24330261)
11. Yankah C. A., Pasic M., Musci M., et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2008; 136 3 688 696
12. Minami K., Zittermann A., Schulte-Eistrup S., Koertke H., Körfer R. Mitroflow synergy prostheses for aortic valve replacement: 19 years experience with 1,516 patients. Ann Thorac Surg: 2005; 80 5 1699 1705 (Pubitemid 41464286)
13. Sjögren J., Gudbjartsson T., Thulin L. I. Long-term outcome of the MitroFlow pericardial bioprosthesis in the elderly after aortic valve replacement. J Heart Valve Dis: 2006; 15 2 197 202
14. Grossi E. A., Schwartz C. F., Yu P. J., et al. High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg: 2008; 85 1 102 106, discussion 107
15. Schmidtler F. W., Tischler I., Lieber M., et al. Cardiac surgery for octogenarians-a suitable procedure? Twelve-year operative and post-hospital mortality in 641 patients over 80 years of age. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2008; 56 1 14 19 (Pubitemid 351224125)
16. Jamieson W. R., Koerfer R., Yankah C. A., et al. Mitroflow aortic pericardial bioprosthesis-clinical performance. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg: 2009; 36 5 818 824
17. Yankah C. A., Pasic M., Musci M., et al. Aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis: durability results up to 21 years. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2008; 136 3 688 696
18. Hashimoto K. Patient-prosthesis mismatch: the Japanese experience. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg: 2006; 12 3 159 165
19. Dumesnil J. G., Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch: an update. Curr Cardiol Rep: 2011; 13 3 250 257
20. Kobayashi Y., Fukushima Y., Hayase T., Kojima K., Endo G. Clinical outcome of aortic valve replacement with 16-mm ATS-advanced performance valve for small aortic annulus. Ann Thorac Surg: 2010; 89 4 1195 1199
21. Moon M. R., Pasque M. K., Munfakh N. A., et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: impact of age and body size on late survival. Ann Thorac Surg: 2006; 81 2 481 488, discussion 489
22. García-Bengochea J., Sierra J., González-Juanatey J. R., et al. Left ventricular mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the new Mitroflow 12A pericardial bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis: 2006; 15 3 446 451, discussion 451-452