Canadian integrative oncology research priorities: Results of a consensus-building process

Current Oncology

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Weeks, L C ^a   Seely, Dugald ^a,b,c   Balneaves, L G ^d   Boon, H S ^e   Leis, A ^f   Oneschuk, D ^g   Sagar, S M ^h,i   Verhoef, M J ^j  

^a Ottawa Integrative Cancer Centre   (Canada)

^b CANADIAN COLLEGE OF NATUROPATHIC MEDICINE   (Canada)

^c OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

^g UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^h MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

ⁱ JURAVINSKI CANCER CENTRE   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

CAM; Canada; Complementary medicine; Consensus development; Integrative oncology; Research priorities

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CANCER MODEL; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RESEARCH; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONSULTATION; DELPHI STUDY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; INTERVIEW; KNOWLEDGE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; RESEARCH PRIORITY; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; STRATEGIC PLANNING; WORKSHOP;

EID: 84881260159     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17187729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3747/co.20.1378     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Astin JA, Reilly C, Perkins C, Child WL on behalf of the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. Breast cancer patients' perspectives on and use of complementary and alternative medicine: a study by the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation. J Soc Integr Oncol 2006;4:157-69.
2. Balneaves LG, Bottorff JL, Hislop TG, Herbert C. Levels of commitment: exploring complementary therapy use by women with breast cancer. J Altern Complement Med 2006;12:459-66.
3. Eng J, Ramsum D, Verhoef M, Guns E, Davison J, Gallagher R. A population-based survey of complementary and alternative medicine use in men recently diagnosed with prostate cancer. Integr Cancer Ther 2003;2:212-16.
4. Molassiotis A, Fernadez-Ortega P, Pud D, et al. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European survey. Ann Oncol 2005;16:655-63.
5. Gansler T, Kaw C, Crammer C, Smith T. A population-based study of prevalence of complementary methods use by cancer survivors: a report from the American Cancer Society's studies of cancer survivors. Cancer 2008;113:1048-57.
6. Deng GE, Frenkel M, Cohen L, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for integrative oncology: complementary therapies and botanicals. J Soc Integr Oncol 2009;7:85-120.
7. Sagar SM. Integrative oncology in North America. J Soc Integr Oncol 2006;4:27-39.
8. Seely DM, Weeks LC, Young S. A systematic review of integrative oncology programs. Curr Oncol 2012;19:e436-61.
9. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984;74:979-83.
10. McMurray AR. Three decision-making aids: brainstorming, nominal group and Delphi technique. J Nurs Staff Dev 1994;10:62-5.
11. Leis A, Sagar S, Verhoef M, Balneaves L, Seely D, Oneschuk D. Shifting the paradigm: from complementary and alternative medicine (cam) to integrative oncology. In: Sutcliffe S, Elwood M, eds. Cancer Control. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press; 2010: 239-58.
12. Robotin M, Holliday C, Bensoussan A. Defining research priorities in complementary medicine in oncology. Complement Ther Med 2012;20:345-52.
13. Melchart D, Ernst E. Priorities for research in complementary medicine. J R Soc Med 2001;94:608.
14. Leis AM, Weeks LC, Verhoef MJ. Principles to guide integrative oncology and the development of an evidence base. Curr Oncol 2008;15(suppl 2):S83-7.
15. Deng G, Weber W, Sood A, Kemper KJ. Research on integrative healthcare: context and priorities. Explore (NY) 2010;6:143-58.
16. Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:1008-15.
17. Tetroe J. Knowledge Translation at the Canadian Institutes of Health Research: A Primer. Technical Brief No. 18. Austin, TX: U.S. National Center for the Dissemination of Disability Research; 2007.