Evidence for added value of baseline testing in computer-based cognitive assessment

Journal of Athletic Training

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 499-505

  Roebuck Spencer, Tresa M ^a   Vincent, Andrea S ^a   Schlegel, Robert E ^a   Gilliland, Kirby ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics; Computerized neuropsychological testing; Concussions; Mild traumatic brain injuries; Military athletes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITIVE DEFECT; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; REFERENCE VALUE; SOLDIER;

COGNITION DISORDERS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; HUMANS; MILITARY PERSONNEL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 84881189418     PISSN: 10626050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.3.11     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Guskiewicz KM, Bruce SL, Cantu RC, et al. Recommendations on management of sport-related concussion: summary of the National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement. Neurosurgery. 2004;55(4):891-895.
2. Guskiewicz KM, Bruce SL, Cantu RC, et al. National Athletic Trainers' Association position statement: management of sportrelated concussion. J Athl Train. 2004;39(3):280-297. (Pubitemid 39318954)
3. United States House of Representatives H.R. 4986. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, Sec. 1618, Comprehensive plan on prevention, diagnosis, mitigation, treatment, rehabilitation of, and research on, traumatic brain injury, post traumatic stress disorder, and other mental health conditions in members of the armed forces. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ query/C?r110:./temp/-r110itMI1I. Accessed January 6, 2010.
4. Randolph C, Kirkwood MW. What are the real risks of sport-related concussion, and are they modifiable? J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009; 15(4):512-520.
5. McCaffrey RJ, Kane RL, eds. DoD contributions to computerized neurocognitive assessment: the ANAM test system. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007;22(supp 1):1-144.
6. Bleiberg J, Kane RL, Reeves DL, Garmoe WS, Halpern E. Factor analysis of computerized and traditional tests used in mild brain injury research. Clin Neuropsychol. 2000;14(3):287-294. (Pubitemid 32127924)
7. Kabat MH, Kane RL, Jefferson AL, DiPino RK. Construct validity of selected Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) battery measures. Clin Neuropsychol. 2001;15(4):498-507. (Pubitemid 34271050)
8. Vincent AS, Roebuck-Spencer TM, Lopez M, et al. The effects of military deployment on cognitive functioning. Mil Med. 2012;177(3): 248-255
9. Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2006.
10. Vincent AS, Roebuck-Spencer T, Gilliland K, Schlegal R. Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (v4) traumatic brain injury battery: military normative data. Mil Med. 2012;177(3):256- 269.
11. Schwab KA, Ivins B, Cramer G, et al. Screening for traumatic brain injury in troops returning from deployment in Afghanistan and Iraq: initial investigation of the usefulness of a short screening tool for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007;22(6):377-389. (Pubitemid 350145106)
12. Vincent AS, Bleiberg J, Yan S, et al. Reference data from the automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics for use in traumatic brain injury in an active duty military sample. Mil Med. 2008;173(9):836-852.
13. Thorne DR. Throughput: a simple performance index with desirable characteristics. Behav Res Methods. 2006;38(4):569-573.
14. Chelune GJ, Naugle RI, Luders H, Sedlack J, Awad IA. Individual change after epilepsy surgery: practice effects and base rate information. Neuropsychology. 1993;7(1):41-52.
15. Maassen GH, Bossema ER, Brand N. Reliable change assessment with practice effects in sport concussion research: a comment on Hinton-Bayre. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(10):829-833. (Pubitemid 44526049)
16. Barr WB. Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes: preliminary norms and test-retest indices. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2003;18(1):91-101. (Pubitemid 36120397)
17. Iverson GL, Lovell MR, Collins MW. Interpreting change on ImPACT following sport concussion. Clin Neuropsychol. 2003; 17(4):460-467. (Pubitemid 38221769)
18. Roebuck-Spencer T, Vincent AS, Schlegal R, Gilliland K. Evidence of added value of baseline testing in computerized testing [poster]. Paper presented at: National Academy of Neuropsychology; October 13-16, 2010; Vancouver, BC, Canada.
19. Brooks BL, Iverson GL. Comparing actual to estimated base rates of ''abnormal'' scores on neuropsychological test batteries: implications for interpretation. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2010;25(1):14-21.
20. Schretlen DJ, Testa SM, Winicki JM, Pearlson GD, Gordon B. Frequency and bases of abnormal performance by healthy adults on neuropsychological testing. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2008;14(3):436- 445. (Pubitemid 351560439)
21. Heaton RK, Miller SW, Taylor MJ, Grant I. Revised Comprehensive Norms for an Expanded Halstead-Reitan Battery: Demographically Adjusted Neuropsychological Norms for African Americans and Caucasian Adults. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc; 2004.
22. Roebuck-Spencer TM, Vincent AS, Twillie DA, et al. Cognitive change associated with self-reported mild traumatic brain injury sustained during the OEF/OIF conflicts. Clin Neuropsychol. 2012; 26(3):473-489.
23. Terrio H, Brenner LA, Ivins BJ, et al. Traumatic brain injury screening: preliminary findings in a US Army Brigade Combat Team. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2009;24(1):14-23.
24. Vasterling JJ, Proctor SP, Amoroso P, Kane R, Heeren T, White RF. Neuropsychological outcomes of Army personnel following deployment to the Iraq War. JAMA. 2006;296(5):519-529. (Pubitemid 44157126)
25. Hoge CW, McGurk D, Thomas JL, Cox AL, Engel CC, Castro CA. Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(5):453-463. (Pubitemid 351185801)
26. Tanielian T, Jaycox LH, eds. Invisible Wounds of War: Psychological and Cognitive Injuries, Their Consequences, and Services to Assist Recovery. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation; 2008.