Throughput: A simple performance index with desirable characteristics

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 569-573

  Thorne, David R ^a  

^a WALTER REED ARMY INSTITUTE OF RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34147217997     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03193886     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. ANGER, D. (1956). The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52, 145-161.
2. CHOCHOLLE, R. (1945). Variation des temps de réaction auditifs en fonction de l'intensité à diverses fréquences. L'Année Psychologique, 41, 65-124.
3. FERSTER, C. B., & SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
4. KANE, R. L., & KAY, G. G. (1992). Computerized assessment in neuropsychology: A review of tests and test batteries. Neuropsychology Review, 3, 1-117.
5. KAY, G. G. (1995). COGSCREEN: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
6. KAY, G. G., BERMAN, B., MOCKOVIAK, S. H., MORRIS, C. E., REEVES, D., STARBUCK, V., ET AL. (1997). Initial and steady-state effects of diphenhydramine and loratadine on sedation, cognition, mood, and psychomotor performance. Archives of Internal Medicine, 157, 2350-2356.
7. PACHELLA, R. G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. H. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. PEW, R. W. (1969). The speed-accuracy operating characteristic. Acta Psychologica, 16-26.
9. REEVES, D., KANE, R., & WINTER, K. (1995). Automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM): Test administrators guide Version 3.11 (Rep. NCRF-95-01). San Diego: National Cognitive Recovery Foundation.
10. SHORT, P., CERNICH, A., WILKEN, J. A., & KANE, R. (in press). Initial construct validation of frequently employed ANAM measures through structural equation modeling. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology.
11. THORNE, D. R., GENSER, S. G., SING, H. C., & HEGGE, F. W. (1983). Plumbing human performance limits during 72 hours of high task load. In Proceedings of the 24th DRG Seminar on the Human as a Limiting Element in Military Systems (pp. 17-40). Toronto, Canada: Defense and Civil Institute of Environmental Medicine.
12. THORNE, D. R., GENSER, S. G., SING, H. C., & HEGGE, F. W. (1985). The Walter Reed performance assessment battery. Neurobehavioral Toxicology & Teratology, 7, 415-418.
13. WICKELGREN, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41, 67-85.
14. WILLIAMS, D. (1994). The relative sensitivity of dependent measures and cognitive tests determined by hypothesis testing (Rep. 95-44). San Diego: Naval Health Research Center.
15. WOOD, C. W., & JENNINGS, J. R. (1976). Speed-accuracy tradeoff functions in choice reaction time: Experimental designs and computational procedures. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 92-102.