Contrast induced nephropathy in patients undergoing intravenous (IV) contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and the relationship with risk factors: A meta-analysis

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 82, Issue 9, 2013, Pages

  Moos, Shira I ^a   Van Vemde, David N H ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a   Bipat, Shandra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Contrast medium; Nephropathy; Prevention; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; NONSTEROID ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT;

ANEMIA; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE; CONTRAST INDUCED NEPHROPATHY; DATA BASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY FAILURE; META ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SENESCENCE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 84881170561     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.04.029     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. K. Nash, A. Hafeez, and S. Hou Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency American Journal of Kidney Diseases: The Official Journal of the National Kidney Foundation 39 5 2002 930 936
2. C. Rihal Incidence and prognostic importance of acute renal failure after percutaneous coronary intervention Circulation 105 19 2002 2259 2264
3. F. Stacul, A. Van der Molen, and P. Reimer Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR contrast media safety committee guidelines European Radiology 21 12 2011 2527 2541
4. Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Radiologie Voorzorgsmaatregelen bij jodiumhoudende contrastmiddelen 2007 CBO richtlijnen
5. A. Benko, M. Fraser-hill, and P. Magner Canadian association of radiologists: consensus guidelines for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy Journal l'Association canadienne des radiologistes Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal 58 2 2007 79 88
6. American College of Radiology American College of Radiology Manual on Contrast Media Version 8 ACR Manual on Contrast Media 2012
7. R. Katzberg, and J. Newhouse Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? Radiology 256 1 2010 21 28
8. D. Baumgarten, and J. Ellis Contrast-induced nephropathy: contrast material not required? American Journal of Roentgenology 191 2 2008 383 386
9. R. Bruce, A. Djamali, and K. Shinki Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity American Journal of Roentgenology 192 3 2009 711 718
10. R. Katzberg, and R. Lamba Contrast-induced nephropathy after intravenous administration: fact or fiction? Radiologic Clinics of North America 47 5 2009 789 800
11. U. Nyman, T. Almén, and B. Jacobsson Are intravenous injections of contrast media really less nephrotoxic than intra-arterial injections? European Radiology 22 6 2012 1366 1371
12. J. Kooiman, S. Pasha, and W. Zondag Meta-analysis: serum creatinine changes following contrast enhanced CT imaging European Journal of Radiology 81 10 2011 2554 2561
13. A. Liberati, D. Altman, and J. Tetzlaff The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration PLoS Medicine 6 7 2009 e1000100
14. A. Verhagen, H. De Vet, and R. De Bie The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 12 1998 1235 1241
15. P. Whiting, A. Rutjes, and M. Westwood QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assesment of diagnositc accuracy studies Annals of Emergency Medicine 155 4 2011 529 536
16. J. Higgins, S. Thompson, and J. Deeks Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses British Medical Journal (Clinical Research ed.) 327 7414 2003 557 560
17. C. Cely, R. Schein, and A. Quartin Risk of contrast induced nephropathy in the critically ill: a prospective, case matched study Critical Care (London, England) 16 2 2012 R67
18. M. Kuhn, N. Chen, and D. Sahani The PREDICT study: a randomized double-blind comparison of contrast-induced nephropathy after low- or isoosmolar contrast agent exposure American Journal of Roentgenology 191 1 2008 151 157
19. B. Barrett, R. Katzberg, and H. Thomsen Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography: a double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol Investigative Radiology 41 2006 815 821 [020-9996 (print)]
20. J. Dillman, M. Al-Hawary, and J. Ellis Comparative investigation of i.v. iohexol and iopamidol: effect on renal function in low-risk outpatients undergoing CT American Journal of Roentgenology 198 2 2012 392 397
21. H. Gurm, S. Dixon, and D. Smith Renal function-based contrast dosing to define safe limits of radiographic contrast media in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions Journal of the American College of Cardiology 58 9 2011 907 914
22. U. Nguyen, S. Suranyi, and P. Ravenel Iso-osmolality versus low-osmolality iodinated contrast medium at intravenous contrast-enhanced CT: effect on kidney function Radiology 248 1 2008 97 105
23. H. Thomsen, S. Morcos, and C. Erley The ACTIVE trial: comparison of the effects on renal function of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing abdominal computed tomography Investigative Radiology 43 3 2008 170 178
24. E. Von Elm, D. Altman, and M. Egger The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies Revista española de salud pública 82 3 2007 251 259