Specification and estimation of mode choice model capturing similarity between mixed auto and transit alternatives

Journal of Choice Modelling

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 29-49

  Bekhor, Shlomo ^a   Shiftan, Yoram ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cross nested logit; Logit kernel; Mode choice; Multinomial logit; Nested logit; Park and Ride

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881169586     PISSN: 17555345     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70034-4     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bekhor S., Ben-Akiva M. and Ramming, M. S. 2002. Adaptation of logit kernel to route choice situation, Transportation Research Record, 1805, 78-85.
2. Ben-Akiva, M. and Bierlaire, M., 1999. Discrete choice methods and their applications to short term travel decisions, in: Hall, R.W. (Ed.), Handbook of Transportation Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 5-34.
3. Ben-Akiva, M. and Bolduc, D., 1996. Multinomial probit with a logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure, Working Paper, MIT.
4. Bierlaire, M., 2003. BIOGEME: a free package for the estimation of discrete choice models, Proceedings of the 3rd Swiss Transportation Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland.
5. Bhat, C., 2001. Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model, Transportation Research Part B, 35(7), 677-693.
6. Bos, I., Ettema, D. and Molin, E., 2004a. Modeling effect of travel time uncertainty and traffic information on use of park-and-ride facilities, Transportation Research Record, 1898, 37-44.
7. Bos, I., Van-Der-Heijden Ege, V. D. R. and Timmermans, H. J. P. 2004b. The choice of park and ride facilities: an analysis using a context-dependent hierarchical choice experiment, Environment and Planning A, 36(9), 1673-86.
8. Cairns, M. R., 1998. The development of park and ride in Scotland, Journal of Transport Geography, 6(4), 295-307.
9. Cascetta, E. and Papola, A., 2003. A joint mode-transit service choice model incorporating the effect of regional transport service timetables, Transportation Research Part B, 37(7), 595-614.
10. Chu, C., 1989. A paired combinatorial logit model for travel demand analysis, Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Transportation Research, 4, Ventura, CA, 295-309.
11. Daly, A. and Bierlaire, M., 2006. A general and operational representation of Generalised Extreme Value models, Transportation Research Part B, 40(6), 285-305.
12. Faghri, A., Lang, A. Hamad, K. and Henck, H., 2002. Integrated knowledge-based geographic information system for determining optimal location of park-and-ride facilities, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 128(1), 18-41.
13. Forinash, C. V., and Koppelman, F., 1992. Application and interpretation of nested logit models of intercity mode choice, Transportation Research Record, 1413, 98-106.
14. Hess, S., Train, K. E. and. Polak, J. W., 2006. On the use of a modified latin hypercube sampling (MLHS) method in the estimation of a mixed logit model for vehicle choice, Transportation Research Part B, 40(2), 147-163.
15. Hole, A.R., 2004. Forecasting the demand for an employee park and ride service using commuters' stated choices, Transport Policy, 11(4), 355-362.
16. Lam, W. H. K., Holyoak, N. M. and Lo, H. P., 2001. How park-and-ride schemes can be successful in eastern Asia, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 127(2), 63-78.
17. McFadden, D., 1978. Modeling the choice of residential location, In Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, Krlqvist, A. Lundqvist, L., Snickars, F. and Weibull, J,W. (eds.) North Holland, Amsterdam, 75-96.
18. McFadden, D. and Train, K., 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5), 447-470.
19. Papola A., 2004. Some developments on the cross-nested logit model, Transportation Research Part B, 38(9), 833-851.
20. Polydoropoulou A. and Ben-Akiva, M. 2001. Combined revealed and stated preference nested logit access and mode choice model for multiple mass transit technologies, Transportation Research Record, 1771, 38-45.
21. Parkhurst, G., 2000. Influence of bus-based park and ride facilities on users' car traffic, Transport Policy, 7(2), 159-172.
22. Parkhurst, G. and Richardson, J., 2002. Modal integration of bus and car in UK local transport policy: the case for strategic environmental assessment, Journal of Transport Geography, 10(3), 195-206.
23. Rohr, C., 2007. The PRISM model, evidence on model hierarchy and parameter values, Technical Report, Prepared for the UK Department of Transport, Rand Corporation, Cambridge, UK.
24. Sandor, Z. and Train, K., 2004. Quasi-random simulation of discrete choice models, Transportation Research Part B, 38(4), 313-327.
25. Seik, F. T., 1997. Experiences from Singapore's park-and-ride scheme 1975-1996, Habitat International, 21(4), 427-443.
26. Train, K., Revelt, D. and Ruud, P., 1999. Mixed logit estimation routine for cross-sectional data, http://elsa.berkeley.edu/Software/abstracts/train0196. html
27. Vovsha, P., 1997. The cross-nested logit model: application to mode choice in the Tel-Aviv metropolitan area, Transportation Research Record, 1607, 6-15.
28. Walker, J., 2001. Extended discrete choice models: integrated framework, flexible error structures, and latent variables, Ph.D. Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
29. Walker, J., Ben-Akiva, M. and Bolduc, D., 2004. Identification of the logit kernel (or mixed logit) model, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne, Switzerland.
30. Wang, J. Y. T., Yang, H. and Lindsey, R. 2004. Locating and pricing park-and-ride facilities in a linear monocentric city with deterministic mode choice, Transportation Research Part B, 38(8), 709-731.
31. Wen, C., and Koppelman, F. 2001. The generalized nested logit model, Transportation Research Part B, 35(7), 627-641.