Paired comparison-based subjective quality assessment of stereoscopic images

Multimedia Tools and Applications

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 31-48

  Lee, Jong Seok ^a   Goldmann, Lutz ^b   Ebrahimi, Touradj ^b  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^b EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Paired comparison; Quality of experience (QoE); Stereoscopic image; Subjective quality

Indexed keywords

PAIR-WISE COMPARISON; PAIRED COMPARISON; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE (QOE); STEREOSCOPIC IMAGE; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; SUBJECTIVE EXPERIMENTS; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY ASSESSMENTS;

DESIGN; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; QUALITY OF SERVICE; THREE DIMENSIONAL; VIDEO RECORDING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84881150185     PISSN: 13807501     EISSN: 15737721     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-012-1011-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bercovitz J (1998) Image-side perspective and stereoscopy. In: Proc. SPIE, vol 3295
2. Bosc E, Pépion R, Callet PL, Köppel M, Ndjiki-Nya P, Pressigout M, Morin L (2011) Towards a new quality metric for 3-D synthesized view assessment. IEEE J Sel Topics Signal Process 5(7):1332-1343
3. Bradley RA, Terry ME (1952) Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. The method of paired comparisons. Biometrika 39:324-345
4. Chen KT, Wu CC, Chang YC, Lei CL (2009) A crowdsourceable QoE evaluation framework for multimedia content. In: Proc. ACM multimedia, pp 491-500
5. Davidson RR (1970) On extending the Bradley-Terry model to accommodate ties in paired comparison experiments. J Am Stat Assoc 65(329):317-328
6. Eichhorn A, Ni P, Eg R (2010) Randomized pair comparison- an economic and robust method for audiovisual quality assessment. In: Proc. int. workshop on network and operating systems support for digital audio and video. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 63-68
7. Glickman ME (1999) Parameter estimation in large dynamic paired comparison experiments. J R Stat Soc, Ser C, Appl Stat 48(3):377-394
8. Goldmann L, Simone FD, Ebrahimi T (2010) Impact of acquisition distortions on the quality of stereoscopic images. In: Proc. int. workshop on video processing and quality metrics for consumer electronics. Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
9. Gotchev A, Akar GB, Capin T, Strohmeier D, Boev A (2011) Three-dimensional media for mobile devices. Proc IEEE 99(4):708-741
10. Huynh-Thu Q, Barkowsky M, Callet PL (2011) The importance of visual attention in improving the 3D-TV viewing experience: overview and new perspectives. IEEE Trans Broadcast 57(2):421-431
11. Huynh-Thu Q, Callet PL, Barkowsky M (2010) Video quality assessment: from 2D to 3D- challenges and future trends. In: Proc. int. conf. image processing. Hong Kong, China, pp 4025-4028
12. Ijsselsteijn WA, de Ridder H, Vliegen J (2000) Subjective evaluation of stereoscopic images: effects of camera parameters and display duration. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 10(2):225-233
13. Jumisko-Pyykkö S, Utriainen T (2011) A hybrid method for quality evaluation in the context of use for mobile (3D) television. Multimed Tools Appl 55(2):185-225
14. Kooi FL, Toet A (2004) Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays. Displays 25(2-3):99-108
15. Lee JS, Simone FD, Ramzan N, Zhao Z, Kurutepe E, Sikora T, Ostermann J, Izquierdo E, Ebrahimi T (2010) Subjective evaluation of scalable video coding for content distribution. In: Proc. ACM multimedia. Firenze, Italy, pp 65-72
16. Liu X, Yang LT, Sohn K (2011) High-speed inter-view frame mode decision procedure for multi-view video coding. Future Gener Comput Syst. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2011.05.013
17. Meesters LMJ, Ijsselsteijn WA, Seuntiëns PJH (2004) A survey of perceptual evaluations and requirements of three-dimensional TV. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst Video Technol 14(3):381-391
18. International Telecommunication Union (2002) Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Recommendation ITU-R BT.500-11
19. Rao PV, Kupper LL (1967) Ties in paired-comparison experiments: a generalization of the Bradley-Terry model. J Am Stat Assoc 62(317):194-204
20. Seuntiiëns P, Meesters L, Ijsselsteijn W (2006) Perceived quality of compressed stereoscopic images: effects of symmetric and asymmetric JPEG coding and camera separation. ACM Trans Appl Percept 3(2):95-109
21. Smolic A, Kauff P, Knorr S, Hornung A, Kunter M, Müller M, Lang M (2011) Three-dimensional video postproduction and processing. Proc IEEE 99(4):607-625
22. International Telecommunication Union (2000) Subjective assessment of stereoscopic television pictures. Recommendation ITU-R BT.1438
23. International Telecommunication Union (1999) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. Recommendation ITU-R P.910
24. Zilly F, Kluger J, Kauff P (2011) Production rules for stereo acquisition. Proc IEEE 99(4):590-606