Subjective evaluation of scalable video coding for content distribution

MM'10 - Proceedings of the ACM Multimedia 2010 International Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 65-72

  Lee, Jong Seok ^a   De Simone, Francesca ^a   Ramzan, Naeem ^b   Zhao, Zhijie ^c   Kurutepe, Engin ^d   Sikora, Thomas ^d   Ostermann, Jörn ^c   Izquierdo, Ebroul ^b   Ebrahimi, Touradj ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^d TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

bit rate adaptation; quality of experience; scalable video coding; subjective test

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION STRATEGIES; BIT RATES; CONTENT DISTRIBUTION; FRAME QUALITY; HIGH-DEFINITION CONTENTS; QUALITY OF EXPERIENCES; RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED NETWORK; SCALABLE VIDEO; SCALABLE VIDEO CODING; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; SUBJECTIVE EVALUATIONS; SUBJECTIVE TESTS; TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; VISUAL QUALITIES;

SCALABILITY;

EID: 78650995653     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1873951.1873981     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. The SVT High Definition Multi Format Test Set. http://www.its.bldrdoc.gov/vqeg.
2. N. Adami, A. Signoroni, and R. Leonardi. State-of-the-art and trends in scalable video compression with wavelet-based approaches. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 17(9):1238–1255, 2007.
3. R. A. Bradley and M. E. Terry. Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: I. the method of paired comparisons. Biometrika, 39:324–345, 1952.
4. N. Cranley, P. Perry, and L. Murphy. Optimum adaptation trajectories for streamed multimedia. Multimedia Systems, 10(5):392–401, 2005.
5. M. E. Glickman. Parameter estimation in large dynamic paired comparison experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 48(3):377–394, 1999.
6. R. D. Luce. Individual choice behavior: A theoretical analysis. Wiley, New York, USA, 1959.
7. T. Oelbaum, H. Schwarz, M. Wien, and T. Wiegand. Subjective performance evaluation of the SVC extension of H.264/AVC. In Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Conf. Image Processing (ICIP), pages 2772–2775, Oct. 12–15, 2008.
8. R. Rajendran, M. van der Schaar, and S.-F. Chang. FGS+: optimizing the joint SNR-temporal video quality in MPEG-4 fine grained scalable coding. In Proc. Int. Symp. Circuits and Systems, pages 445–448, 2002.
9. N. Ramzan, T. Zgaljic, and E. Izquierdo. An efficient optimisation scheme for scalable surveillance centric video communications. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 24(6):510–523, 2009.
10. Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures. Recommendation ITU-R BT.500-11, 2002.
11. Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications. Recommendation ITU-R P.910, 1999.
12. J. Reichel, H. Schwarz, and M. Wien. Joint scalable video model 11 (JSVM 11). Joint Video Team, doc. JVT-X202, Jul. 2007.
13. H. Schwarz, D. Marpe, and T. Wiegand. Overview of the scalable video coding extension of the H.264/AVC standard. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 17(9):1103 – 1120, Sep. 2007.
14. Y. Wang, S.-F. Chang, and A. C. Lou. Subjective preference of spatio-temporal rate in video adaptation using multi-dimensional scalable coding. In Proc. Int. Conf. Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pages 1119–1122, 2004.
15. F. Wickelmaier and C. Schmid. A Matlab function to estimate choice model parameters from paired-comparison data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36(1):29–40, 2004.
16. G. Zhai, J. Cai, W. Lin, X. Yang, W. Zhang, and M. Etoh. Cross-dimensional perceptual quality assessment for low bit-rate videos. IEEE Trans. Multimedia, 10(7):1316–1324, Nov. 2008.