Influence of curing conditions on properties of high calcium fly ash geopolymer containing Portland cement as additive

Materials and Design

Volumn 53, Issue , 2014, Pages 269-274

  Pangdaeng, Saengsuree ^a   Phoo ngernkham, Tanakorn ^a   Sata, Vanchai ^a   Chindaprasirt, Prinya ^a  

^a KHON KAEN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Additive; Curing condition; Geopolymer; High calcium fly ash; Portland cement

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVES; CALCIUM; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; FLY ASH; GEOPOLYMERS; INORGANIC POLYMERS; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MICROSTRUCTURE; PORTLAND CEMENT; VAPORS;

CURING CONDITION; CURING METHODS; GEOPOLYMER; GEOPOLYMER MORTARS; HIGH-CALCIUM FLY ASH; ORDINARY PORTLAND CEMENT; PROPERTIES AND MICROSTRUCTURES; TEMPERATURE CURING;

CURING;

EID: 84881101201     PISSN: 02641275     EISSN: 18734197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.07.018     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA. Climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York (USA): Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 447-96.
2. Davidovits J. Geopolymers - inorganic polymeric new materials. J Therm Anal Calorim 1991, 37:1633-1656.
3. Wongpa J., Kiattikomol K., Jaturapitakkul C., Chindaprasirt P. Compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and water permeability of inorganic polymer concrete. Mater Des 2010, 31:4748-4754.
4. Sata V., Sathonsaowaphak A., Chindaprasirt P. Resistance of lignite bottom ash geopolymer mortar to sulfate and sulfuric acid attack. Cement Concr Compos 2012, 34:700-708.
5. Chindaprasirt P., Chareerat T., Sirivivatnanon V. Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer. Cement Concr Compos 2007, 29:224-229.
6. Guo X., Shi H., Chen L., Dick W.A. Alkali-activated complex binders from class C fly ash and Ca-containing admixtures. J Hazard Mater 2010, 173:480-486.
7. Bakharev T. Thermal behaviour of geopolymers prepared using class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing. Cem Concr Res 2006, 36:1134-1147.
8. Allahverdi A., Kani E.N., Yazdanipour M. Effects of blast-furnace slag on natural pozzolan-based geopolymer cement. Ceram-Silikaty 2011, 55:68-78.
9. Palomo A., Fernández-Jiménez A., Kovalchuk G., Ordoñez L.M., Naranjo M.C. OPC-fly ash cementitious systems: study of gel binders produced during alkaline hydration. J Mater Sci 2007, 42:2958-2966.
10. Chindaprasirt P., Rukzon S. Strength, porosity and corrosion resistance of ternary blend Portland cement, rice husk ash and fly ash mortar. Constr Build Mater 2008, 22:1601-1606.
11. Thokchom S., Ghosh P., Ghosh S. Effect of water absorption, porosity and sorptivity on durability of geopolymer mortars. ARPN J Eng Appl Sci 2009, 4:28-32.
12. 3 on the setting and hardening of high calcium fly ash-based geopolymer systems. J Mater Sci 2012, 47:4876-4883.
13. Lee W.K.W., van Deventer J.S.J. The effects of inorganic salt contamination on the strength and durability of geopolymers. Colloids Surf, A 2002, 211:115-126.
14. Somna K., Jaturapitakkul C., Kajitvichyanukul P., Chindaprasirt P. NaOH-activated ground fly ash geopolymer cured at ambient temperature. Fuel 2011, 90:2118-2124.
15. Kroehong W., Sinsiri T., Jaturapitakkul C., Chindaprasirt P. Effect of palm oil fuel ash fineness on the microstructure of blended cement paste. Constr Build Mater 2011, 25:4095-4104.
16. Temuujin J., van Riessen A., Williams R. Influence of calcium compounds on the mechanical properties of fly ash geopolymer pastes. J Hazard Mater 2009, 167:82-88.
17. Davidovits J. Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. In: Second international conference on geopolymer. Saint-Quentin (France); 1999. p. 9-40.
18. Maltais Y., Marchand J. Influence of curing temperature on cement hydration and mechanical strength development of fly ash mortars. Cem Concr Res 1997, 27:1009-1020.
19. Ridtirud C., Chindaprasirt P., Pimraksa K. Factors affecting the shrinkage of fly ash geopolymers. Int J Min, Metall Mater 2011, 18:100-104.
20. 2O. Cem Concr Res 2011, 41:923-931.
21. Lecomte I., Henrist C., Liegeois M., Maseri F., Rulmont A., Cloots R. (Micro)-structural comparison between geopolymers, alkali-activated slag cement and Portland cement. J Eur Ceram Soc 2006, 26:3789-3797.
22. Yip C.K., Lukey G.C., Van Deventer J.S.J. The coexistence of geopolymeric gel and calcium silicate hydrate at the early stage of alkaline activation. Cem Concr Res 2005, 35:1688-1697.