Convergent and incremental predictive validity of clinician, self-report, and structured interview diagnoses for personality disorders over 5 years

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Volumn 81, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 650-659

  Samuel, Douglas B ^a   Sanislow, Charles A ^b   Hopwood, Christopher J ^c   Shea, M Tracie ^d   Skodol, Andrew E ^e   Morey, Leslie C ^f   Ansell, Emily B ^a   Markowitz, John C ^g   Zanarini, Mary C ^h   Grilo, Carlos M ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PROVIDENCE VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Sunbelt Collaborative   (United States)

^f TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

clinician; diagnostic agreement; personality disorder; self report; semistructured interview

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AVOIDANT PERSONALITY DISORDER; BORDERLINE STATE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPULSIVE PERSONALITY DISORDER; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DSM-IV; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT FORM; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHIZOTYPAL PERSONALITY DISORDER; SELF REPORT; SELF REPORT QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; ADOLESCENT; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; STANDARDS; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; SELF REPORT; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881059923     PISSN: 0022006X     EISSN: 19392117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0032813     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
2. Blashfield, R. K., & Herkov, M. J. (1996). Investigating clinician adherence to diagnosis by criteria: A replication of Morey and Ochoa (1989 Journal of Personality Disorders, 10, 219-228. doi:10.1521/pedi.1996. 10.3.219
3. Cicchetti, D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284-290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
4. Clark, L. A., Simms, L. J., Wu, K. D., & Casillas, A. (in press). Manual for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality (SNAP-2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5. Davidson, K. M., Obonsawin, M. C., Seils, M., & Patience, L. (2003 Patient and clinician agreement on personality using the SWAP-200. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 208-218. doi:10.1521/pedi.17.3. 208.22148
6. Dreessen, L., & Arntz, A. (1999). Personality disorders have no excessively negative impact on therapist-rated therapy process in the cognitive and behavioural treatment of Axis I anxiety disorders. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 6, 384 -394. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0879(199911)6:5-384::AID- CPP218-3.0.CO;2-8
7. Elkin, I., Parloff, M. B., Hadley, S. W., & Autry, J. H. (1985). NIMH Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program: Background and research plan. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 305-316. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985. 01790260103013
8. Fridell, M., & Hesse, M. (2006). Clinical diagnosis and SCID-II assessment of DSM-III-R personality disorders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 104-108. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.22.2.104
9. Ganellen, R. J. (2007). Assessing normal and abnormality personality functioning: Strengths and weaknesses of self-report, observer, and performance-based methods. Journal of Personality Assessment, 89, 30-40. doi:10.1080/00223890701356987
10. Grove, W. M., Zald, D. H., Lebow, B. S., Snitz, B. E., & Nelson, C. (2000 Clinical versus mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 12, 19-30. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19
11. Gunderson, J. G., Shea, M. T., Skodol, A. E., McGlashan, T. H., Morey, L. C., Stout, R. L., Keller, M. B. (2000). The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: Development, aims, design, and sample characteristics. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 300-315. doi:10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4.300
12. Hopwood, C. J., Morey, L. C., Edelen, M. O., Shea, M. T., Grilo, C. M., Sanislow, C. A., Skodol, A. E. (2008). A comparison of interview and self-report methods for the assessment of borderline personality disorder criteria. Psychological Assessment, 20, 81-85. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.20.1.81
13. Huprich, S. K., Bornstein, R. F., & Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and classification of Axis II personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 557-570. doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.557
14. Hyler, S. E., Rieder, R. O., Williams, J. B., & Spitzer, R. L. (1989). A comparison of clinical and self-report diagnoses of DSM-III personality disorders in 552 patients. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 30, 170-178. doi:10.1016/0010-440X(89)90070-9
15. Keller, M. B., Lavori, P. W., Friedman, B., Nielsen, E., Endicott, J., Mcdonaldscott, P., & Andreasen, N. C. (1987). The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation: A comprehensive method for assessing outcome in prospective longitudinal studies. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 540-548. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1987.01800180050009
16. Klein, D. N. (2003). Patients' versus informants' reports of personality disorders in predicting 7 1/2-year outcome in outpatients with depressive disorders. Psychological Assessment, 15, 216-222. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.15.2.216
17. Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002674
18. Loranger, A. W., Lenzenweger, M. F., Gartner, A. F., Susman, V. L., Herzig, J., Zammit, G. K., Young, R. C. (1991). Trait-state artifacts and the diagnosis of personality disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 720-728. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810320044007
19. McDermut, W., & Zimmerman, M. (2005). Assessment instruments and standardized evaluation. In J. Oldham, A. E. Skodol, & D. Bender (Eds.), The American Psychiatric Publishing textbook of personality disorder (pp. 89-102). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Publishing.
20. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction; a theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. doi:10.1037/11281-000
21. Morey, L. C., Blashfield, R. K., Webb, W. W., & Jewell, J. (1988). MMPI scales for DSM-III personality disorders: A preliminary validation study. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 47-50. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198801)44:1-47: :AID-JCLP2270440110-3.0.CO;2-R
22. Morey, L. C., & Ochoa, E. S. (1989). An investigation of adherence to diagnostic criteria: Clinical diagnosis of the DSM-III personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3, 180-192. doi:10.1521/pedi .1989.3.3.180
23. Morey, L. C., Shea, M. T., Markowitz, J. C., Stout, R. L., Hopwood, C. J., Gunderson, J. G., Skodol, A. E. (2010). State effects of major depression on the assessment of personality and personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 528-535. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp .2009.09071023
24. Nestadt, G., Di, C., Samuels, J. F., Cheng, Y-J., Bienvenu, O. J., Reti, I.M., Bandeen-Roche, K. (2012). Concordance between personality disorder assessment methods. Psychological Medicine, 42, 657-667. doi:10.1017/ S0033291711001632
25. Oltmanns, T. F., & Turkheimer, E. (2009). Person perception and personality pathology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 32-36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01601.x.
26. Perry, J. C. (1992). Problems and considerations in the valid assessment of personality disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 149, 1645-1653.
27. Pilkonis, P. A., Hallquist, M. N., Morse, J. Q., & Stepp, S. D. (2011 Striking the (im)proper balance between scientific advances and clinical utility: Commentary on the DSM-5 proposal for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 68-82. doi:10.1037/a0022226
28. Pilkonis, P. A., Heape, C. L., Ruddy, J., & Serrao, P. (1991). Validity in the diagnosis of personality disorders: The use of the LEAD standard. Psychological Assessment, 3, 46-54. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.3.1.46
29. Rettew, D. C., Lynch, A. D., Achenbach, T. M., Dumenci, L., & Ivanova, M. Y. (2009). Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 18, 169-184. doi:10.1002/mpr.289
30. Rossi, G., Van den Brande, I., Tobac, A., Sloore, H., & Hauben, C. (2003 Convergent validity of the MCMI-III personality disorder scales and the MMPI-2 scales. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 330-340. doi: 10.1521/pedi.17.4.330.23970
31. Rottman, B. M., Ahn, W-k., Sanislow, C. A., & Kim, N. S. (2009). Can clinicians recognize DSM-IV personality disorders from five-factor model descriptions of patient cases? American Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 427-433. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08070972
32. Samuel, D. B., Hopwood, C. J., Ansell, E. B., Morey, L. C., Sanislow, C., Markowitz, J. C., Grilo, C. M. (2011). Comparing the temporal stability of self-report and interview assessed personality disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 120, 670-680. doi:10.1037/a0022647
33. Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2010). Comparing personality disorder models: Cross-method assessment of the FFM and DSM-IV-TR. Journal of Personality Disorders, 24, 721-745. doi:10.1521/pedi.2010.24.6.721
34. Shea, M. T., Glass, D. R., Pilkonis, P. A., Watkins, J. T., & Docherty, J. P. (1987). Frequency and implications of personality disorders in a sample of depressed outpatients. Journal of Personality Disorders, 1, 27-42. doi:10.1521/pedi.1987.1.1.27
35. Shea, M. T., Pilkonis, P. A., Beckham, E., Collins, J. F., Elkin, I., Sotsky, S. M., & Docherty, J. P. (1990). Personality disorders and treatment outcome in the NIMH treatment of depression collaborative research program. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 711-718.
36. Shedler, J., Beck, A., Fonagy, P., Gabbard, G. O., Gunderson, J., Kernberg, O., Westen, D. (2010). Personality disorders in DSM-5. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167, 1026 -1028. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010. 10050746
37. Shedler, J., & Westen, D. (2004). Refining personality disorder diagnosis: Integrating science and practice. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 1350-1365. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1350
38. Skodol, A. E., Bender, D. S., Morey, L. C., Clark, L. A., Oldham, J. M., Alarcon, R. D., Siever, L. J. (2011). Personality disorder types proposed for DSM-5 [Review]. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 136-169. doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.136
39. Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., Oldham, J. M. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5 Part I: Description and rationale. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 4-22. doi:10.1037/a0021891
40. Weissman, M. M., & Bothwell, S. (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 1111-1115. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010
41. Westen, D. (1997). Divergences between clinical and research methods for assessing personality disorders: Implications for research and the evolution of Axis II. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 895-903.
42. Westen, D. (2004). The Clinical Diagnostic Interview. Atlanta, GA: Emory University, Departments of Psychology and Psychiatry and Behaviorial Sciences.
43. Westen, D., DeFife, J. A., Bradley, B., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2010 Prototype personality diagnosis in clinical practice: A viable alternative for DSM-5 and ICD-11. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 41, 482-487. doi:10.1037/a0021555
44. Westen, D., & Muderrisoglu, S. (2003). Assessing personality disorders using a systematic clinical interview: Evaluation of an alternate to structured interviews. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 351-369. doi:10.1521/pedi.17.4.351.23967
45. Westen, D., & Muderrisoglu, S. (2006). Clinical assessment of pathological personality traits. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 1285-1287. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.7.1285
46. Westen, D., & Shedler, J. (1999). Revising and assessing Axis II, Part I: Developing a clinically and empirically valid assessment method. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 258-272. doi:10.1521/pedi.2000.14.4. 291
47. Westen, D., Shedler, J., & Bradley, R. (2006). A prototype approach to personality disorder diagnosis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163, 846-856. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.163.5.846
48. Westen, D., Shedler, J., Bradley, B., & DeFife, J. A. (2012). An empirically derived taxonomy for personality diagnosis: Bridging science and practice in conceptualizing personality. American Journal of Psychiatry, 169, 273-284. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020274
49. Westen, D., & Weinberger, J. (2004). When clinical description becomes statistical prediction. American Psychologist, 59, 595-613. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.59.7.595
50. Widiger, T. A. (2011). A shaky future for personality disorders. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2, 54-67. doi: 10.1037/a0021855
51. Widiger, T. A., & Boyd, S. (2009). Assessing personality disorders. In J. Butcher (Ed.), Oxford handbook of personality assessment (pp. 336-363). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195366877.013. 0018
52. Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Reich, D. B., & Fitzmaurice, G. (2010). The 10-year course of psychosocial functioning among patients with borderline personality disorder and Axis II comparison subjects. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 122, 103-109. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2010.01543.x.
53. Zanarini, M. C., Frankenburg, F. R., Sickel, A. E., & Yong, L. (1996). The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV Belmont, MA: McLean Hospital.
54. Zanarini, M. C., Skodol, A. E., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C., Schaefer, E., Gunderson, J. G. (2000). The collaborative longitudinal personality disorders study: Reliability of Axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 291-299. doi:10.1521/pedi.2000. 14.4.291
55. Zimmerman, M. (1994). Diagnosing personality disorders: A review of issues and research methods. Archives of General Psychiatry, 51, 225-245. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030061006
56. Zimmerman, M. (2011). A critique of the proposed prototype rating system for personality disorders in DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 206-221. doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.206
57. Zimmerman, M., & Mattia, J. I. (1999). Differences between clinical and research practices in diagnosing borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 1570-1574.