Psychometric characteristics of daily diaries for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®): A preliminary investigation

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1859-1869

  Schneider, Stefan ^a   Choi, Seung W ^b   Junghaenel, Doerte U ^a   Schwartz, Joseph E ^a   Stone, Arthur A ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Electronic diaries; Item response theory; Patient reported outcomes; PROMIS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; DEPRESSION; DEVICES; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOMETRY; RECALL; SELF REPORT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; EQUIPMENT; STATISTICS;

ADULT; AGED; DEPRESSION; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; SELF REPORT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84881024760     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-012-0323-3     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Cella, D.; Riley, W.; Stone, A.; Rothrock, N.; Reeve, B.; Yount, S.; et al. (2010). The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005-2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1179-1194.
2. DeWalt, D. A.; Rothrock, N.; Yount, S.; & Stone, A. A. (2007). Evaluation of item candidates - The PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical Care, 45(5), S12-S21.
3. Liu, H.; Cella, D.; Gershon, R.; Shen, J.; Morales, L. S.; Riley, W.; et al. (2010). Representativeness of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Internet panel. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(11), 1169-1178.
4. Institute of Medicine. (2011). Leading health indicators for healthy people 2020: Letter Report. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
5. Leidy, N. K.; Wilcox, T. K.; Jones, P. W.; Murray, L.; Winnette, R.; Howard, K.; et al. (2010). Development of the EXAcerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Tool (EXACT): A Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measure. Value in Health, 13(8), 965-975.
6. Jim, H. S.; Small, B.; Faul, L. A.; Franzen, J.; Apte, S.; & Jacobsen, P. B. (2011). Fatigue, depression, sleep, and activity during chemotherapy: daily and intraday variation and relationships among symptom changes. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42(3), 321-333.
7. Chapman, C. R.; Donaldson, G. W.; Davis, J. J.; & Bradshaw, D. H. (2011). Improving individual measurement of postoperative pain: The Pain Trajectory. Journal of Pain, 12(2), 257-262.
8. Begg, A.; Drummond, G.; & Tiplady, B. (2003). Assessment of postsurgical recovery after discharge using a pen computer diary. Anaesthesia, 58(11), 1101-1105.
9. Broderick, J. E.; Schneider, S.; Schwartz, J. E.; & Stone, A. A. (2010). Interference with activities due to pain and fatigue: Accuracy of ratings across different reporting periods. Quality of Life Research, 19(8), 1163-1170.
10. Broderick, J. E.; Schwartz, J. E.; Schneider, S.; & Stone, A. A. (2009). Can end-of-day reports replace momentary assessment of pain and fatigue? Journal of Pain, 10(3), 274-281.
11. Broderick, J. E.; Schwartz, J. E.; Vikingstad, G.; Pribbernow, M.; Grossman, S.; & Stone, A. A. (2008). The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain, 139(1), 146-157.
12. Schwarz, N. (2007). Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: The rationale for real-time data capture. In A. A. Stone, S. S. Shiffman, A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 11-26). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Winkielman, P.; Knauper, B.; & Schwarz, N. (1998). Looking back at anger: Reference periods change the interpretation of emotion frequency questions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 719-728.
14. Roesch, S. C.; Aldridge, A. A.; Stocking, S. N.; Villodas, F.; Leung, Q.; Bartley, C. E.; et al. (2010). Multilevel factor analysis and structural equation modeling of daily diary coping data: Modeling trait and state variation. Multivariate Behav Res, 45(5), 767-789.
15. Mehta, P. D.; & Neale, M. C. (2005). People are variables too: Multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 259-284.
16. Zyphur, M. J.; Kaplan, S. A.; & Christian, M. S. (2008). Assumptions of cross-level measurement and structural invariance in the analysis of multilevel data: Problems and solutions. Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice, 12(2), 127-140.
17. Skrondal, A.; & Rabe Hesketh, S. (2004). Generalized latent variable modeling: multilevel, longitudinal, and structural equation models. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
18. Amtmann, D.; Cook, K. F.; Jensen, M. P.; Chen, W. H.; Choi, S.; Revicki, D.; et al. (2010). Development of a PROMIS item bank to measure pain interference. Pain, 150(1), 173-182.
19. Lai, J. S.; Cella, D.; Choi, S.; Junghaenel, D. U.; Christodoulou, C.; Gershon, R.; et al. (2011). How item banks and their application can influence measurement practice in rehabilitation medicine: A PROMIS fatigue item bank example. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(10 Suppl), S20-S27.
20. Pilkonis, P. A.; Choi, S. W.; Reise, S. P.; Stover, A. M.; Riley, W. T.; Cella, D.; et al. (2011). Item banks for measuring emotional distress from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS (R)): Depression, Anxiety, and Anger. Assessment, 18(3), 263-283.
21. Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores. Psychometrika, 34, 100-114.
22. Reeve, B. B.; Hays, R. D.; Bjorner, J. B.; Cook, K. F.; Crane, P. K.; Teresi, J. A.; et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks - Plans for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5), S22-S31.
23. Muthén, L. K.; & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2010). Mplus user's guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
24. McDonald, R. P. (1982). Linear Versus Non-Linear Models in Item Response Theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6(4), 379-396.
25. Grilli, L.; & Rampichini, C. (2007). Multilevel factor models for ordinal variables. Structural Equation Modeling-a Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(1), 1-25.
26. Gregorich, S. E. (2006). Do self-report instruments allow meaningful comparisons across diverse population groups? Testing measurement invariance using the confirmatory factor analysis framework. Medical Care, 44(11), S78-S94.
27. Mellenberg, G. J. (1982). Contingency table models for assessing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 105-108.
28. Muthén, B. O.; & Asparouhov, T. (2009). Beyond multilevel regression modeling: multilevel analysis in a general latent variable framework. In J. Hox & J. K. Roberts (Eds.), The Handbook of Advanced Multilevel Analysis (pp. 15-40). New York: Taylor and Francis.
29. Woods, C. M. (2009). Empirical Selection of Anchors for Tests of Differential Item Functioning. Applied Psychological Measurement, 33(1), 42-57.
30. Stark, S.; Chernyshenko, E. S.; & Drasgow, F. (2006). Detecting differential item functioning with confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Toward a unified strategy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1292-1306.
31. Benjamini, Y.; & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate - a Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological, 57(1), 289-300.
32. Stone, A. A.; Schwartz, J. E.; Broderick, J. E.; & Shiffman, S. S. (2005). Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: A consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1340-1346.
33. Schneider, S.; Stone, A. A.; Schwartz, J. E.; & Broderick, J. E. (2011). Peak and End Effects in Patients' Daily Recall of Pain and Fatigue: A Within-Subjects Analysis. Journal of Pain, 12(2), 228-235.
34. Noonan, V. K.; Cook, K. F.; Bamer, A. M.; Choi, S. W.; Kim, J.; & Amtmann, D. (2011). Measuring fatigue in persons with multiple sclerosis: creating a crosswalk between the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale and the PROMIS Fatigue Short Form. Quality of Life Research.
35. Thissen, D.; Varni, J. W.; Stucky, B. D.; Liu, Y.; Irwin, D. E.; & Dewalt, D. A. (2011). Using the PedsQL 3.0 asthma module to obtain scores comparable with those of the PROMIS pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS). Quality of Life Research, 20(9), 1497-1505.
36. Gibbons, L. E.; Feldman, B. J.; Crane, H. M.; Mugavero, M.; Willig, J. H.; Patrick, D.; et al. (2011). Migrating from a legacy fixed-format measure to CAT administration: calibrating the PHQ-9 to the PROMIS depression measures. Quality of Life Research, 20(9), 1349-1357.
37. Ackerman, T. A. (1992). A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity from a Multidimensional Perspective. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29(1), 67-91.
38. Muthén, B. O.; & Curran, P. J. (1997). General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: A latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychological Methods, 2(4), 371-402.
39. Cranford, J. A.; Shrout, P. E.; Iida, M.; Rafaeli, E.; Yip, T.; & Bolger, N. (2006). A procedure for evaluating sensitivity to within-person change: Can mood measures in diary studies detect change reliably? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(7), 917-929.