Can End-of-Day Reports Replace Momentary Assessment of Pain and Fatigue?

Journal of Pain

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 274-281

  Broderick, Joan E ^a   Schwartz, Joseph E ^a   Schneider, Stefan ^a   Stone, Arthur A ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

electronic diaries; fatigue; momentary assessment; Pain; patient reported outcomes

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT; END OF DAY RATING; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD; PAIN; PAIN ASSESSMENT; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT;

AGED; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; CHRONIC DISEASE; FATIGUE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 60849102765     PISSN: 15265900     EISSN: 15288447     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bolognese J.A., Schnitzer T.J., and Ehrich E.W. Response relationship of VAS and Likert scales in osteoarthritis efficacy measurement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11 (2003) 499-507
2. Broderick J.E., Schwartz J.E., Vikingstad G., Pribbernow M., Grossman S., and Stone A.A. The accuracy of pain and fatigue items across different reporting periods. Pain (2008, April 30) [Epub ahead of print]
3. Bushnell D.M., Reilly M.C., Galani C., Martin M.L., Ricci J.F., Patrick D.L., and McBurney C.R. Validation of electronic data capture of the irritable bowel syndrome: Quality of life measure, the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire for irritable bowel syndrome and the EuroQol. Value Health 9 (2006) 98-105
4. Cook A.J., Roberts D.A., Henderson M.D., Van Winkle L.C., Chastain D.C., and Hamill-Ruth R.J. Electronic pain questionnaires: A randomized, crossover comparison with paper questionnaires for chronic pain assessment. Pain 110 (2004) 310-317
5. Daut R.L., and Cleeland C.S. The prevalence and severity of pain in cancer. Cancer 50 (1982) 1913-1918
6. Jensen M.P., and McFarland C.A. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 55 (1993) 195-203
7. Litcher-Kelly L., Martino S., Broderick J., and Stone A. A systematic review of measures used to assess chronic pain in randomized clinical trails and controlled trials. J Pain 8 (2007) 906-913
8. Lund I., Lundeberg T., Sandberg L., Budh C.N., Kowalski J., and Svensson E. Lack of interchangeability between visual analogue and verbal rating pain scales: A cross sectional description of pain etiology groups. BMC Med Res Methodology 5 (2005) 31
9. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1 (1975) 277-299
10. Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain 30 (1987) 191-197
11. Mendoza T.R., Wang X.S., Cleeland C.S., Morrissey M., Johnson B.A., Wendt J.K., and Huber S.L. The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: Use of the Brief Fatigue Inventory. Cancer 85 (1999) 1186-1196
12. Nunnally J.C., and Bernstein I.H. Psychometric Theory. 3rd edition (1994), McGraw-Hill, New York
13. Redelmeier D.A., and Kahneman D. Patients' memories of painful medical treatments: Real-time and retrospective evaluations of two minimally invasive procedures. Pain 66 (1996) 3-8
14. Revicki D.A. FDA draft guidance and health-outcomes research. Lancet 369 (2007) 540-542
15. Salovey P., Smith A., Turk D.C., Jobe J.B., and Willis G.B. The accuracy of memories for pain: Not so bad most of the time. Am Pain Soc J 2 (1993) 184-191
16. Schafer J.L., and Graham J.W. Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7 (2002) 147-177
17. Stone A., Broderick J., Kaell A., DelesPaul P., and Porter L. Does the peak-end phenomenon observed in laboratory pain studies apply to real-world pain in rheumatoid arthritics?. J Pain 1 (2000) 212-217
18. Stone A., Broderick J., Porter L., and Kaell A. The experience of rheumatoid arthritis pain and fatigue: Examining momentary reports and correlates over one week. Arthritis Care Res 10 (1997) 185-193
19. Stone A., Broderick J., Shiffman S., and Schwartz J. Understanding recall of weekly pain from a momentary assessment perspective: Absolute accuracy, between- and within-person consistency, and judged change in weekly pain. Pain 107 (2004) 61-69
20. Stone A., and Shiffman S. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) in behavioral medicine. Ann Behav Med 16 (1994) 199-202
21. In: Stone A., Shiffman S., Atienza A., and Nebling L. (Eds). The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (2007), Oxford University, New York
22. Stone A.A., Broderick J.E., Schwartz J.E., Shiffman S., Litcher-Kelly L., and Calvanese P. Intensive momentary reporting of pain with an electronic diary: Reactivity, compliance, and patient satisfaction. Pain 104 (2003) 343-351
23. van den Brink M., Bandell-Hoekstra E.N., and Abu-Saad H.H. The occurrence of recall bias in pediatric headache: A comparison of questionnaire and diary data. Headache 41 (2001) 11-20
24. Von Korff M., Jensen M.P., and Karoly P. Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research. Spine 25 (2000) 3140-3151
25. Ware Jr. J.E., Kosinski M., Turner-Bowker D., and Gandek B. How to score version 2 of the SF-12 Health Survey (2002), Quality Metric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI
26. Williams D.A., Gendreau M., Hufford M.R., Groner K., Gracely R.H., and Clauw D.J. Pain assessment in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome: A consideration of methods for clinical trials. Clin J Pain 20 (2004) 348-356