A mathematical model to describe in vitro kinetics of H2 gas accumulation

Animal Feed Science and Technology

Volumn 184, Issue 1-4, 2013, Pages 1-16

  Wang, M ^a   Janssen, P H ^b   Sun, X Z ^b   Muetzel, S ^b   Tavendale, M ^b   Tan, Z L ^a   Pacheco, D ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^b AGRESEARCH GRASSLANDS   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Hydrogen; Logistic Exponential model; Methane; Methanogen inhibitor; Rumen

Indexed keywords

RHEUM PALMATUM; RHEUM X HYBRIDUM;

EID: 84881024702     PISSN: 03778401     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Benchaar C., Rivest J., Pomar C., Chiquette J. Prediction of methane production from dairy cows using existing mechanistic models and regression equations. J. Anim. Sci. 1998, 76:617-627.
2. Cottle D.J., Nolan J.V., Wiedemann S.G. Ruminant enteric methane mitigation: a review. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2011, 51:491-514.
3. Dennis J.E., Gay D.M., Welsch R.E. An adaptive nonlinear least-squares algorithm. ACM Trans. Math. Softw. 1981, 7:348-368.
4. Ellis J.L., Dijkstra J., Kebreab E., Bannink A., Odongo N.E., McBride B.W., France J. Aspects of rumen microbiology central to mechanistic modelling of methane production in cattle. J. Agric. Sci. 2008, 146:213-233.
5. France J., Dhanoa M.S., Theodorou M.K., Lister S.J., Davies D.R., Isac D. A model to interpret gas accumulation profiles associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. J. Theor. Biol. 1993, 163:99-111.
6. France J., Dijkstra J., Dhanoa M.S., López S., Bannink A. Estimating the extent of degradation of ruminant feeds from a description of their gas production profiles observed in vitro: derivation of models and other mathematical considerations. Brit. J. Nutr. 2000, 83:143-150.
7. Groot J.C.J., Cone J.W., Williams B.A., Debersaques F.M.A., Lantinga E.A. Multiphasic analysis of gas production kinetics for in vitro fermentation of ruminant feeds. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 1996, 64:77-89.
8. Guo W.S., Schaefer D.M., Guo X.X., Ren L.P., Meng Q.X. Use of nitrate-nitrogen as a sole dietary nitrogen source to inhibit ruminal methanogenesis and to improve microbial nitrogen synthesis in vitro. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 22:542-549.
9. Hegarty R., Gerdes R. Hydrogen production and transfer in the rumen. Recent Adv. Anim. Nutr. 1998, 12:37-44.
10. Hegarty R.S. Mechanisms for competitively reducing ruminal methanogenesis. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 1999, 50:1299-1305.
11. Hungate R.E. Hydrogen as an intermediate in the rumen fermentation. Arch. Mikrobiol. 1967, 59:158-164.
12. Janssen P.H. Influence of hydrogen on rumen methane formation and fermentation balances through microbial growth kinetics and fermentation thermodynamics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2010, 160:1-22.
13. Martin C., Morgavi D.P., Doreau M. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal 2010, 4:351-365.
14. Mills J.A.N., Dijkstra J., Bannink A., Cammell S.B., Kebreab E., France J. A mechanistic model of whole-tract digestion and methanogenesis in the lactating dairy cow: model development, evaluation, and application. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79:1584-1597.
15. Motulsky H.J., Ransnas L.A. Fitting curves to data using nonlinear regression: a practical and nonmathematical review. FASEB J. 1987, 1:365-374.
16. Mould F.L., Morgan R., Kliem K.E., Krystallidou E. A review and simplification of the in vitro incubation medium. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 123:155-172.
17. Muetzel S., Hunt C.L., Tavendale M.H. Brief communication: evaluating rumen fluid from sheep and cattle as inoculum in a newly developed automated in vitro rumen batch culture system. Proc. New Zeal. Soc. Anim. Prod. 2011, 240-242.
18. Pellikaan W.F., Hendriks W.H., Uwimana G., Bongers L., Becker P.M., Cone J.W. A novel method to determine simultaneously methane production during in vitro gas production using fully automated equipment. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 168:196-205.
19. 4 production using an automated pressure evaluation system (APES). Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167:377-390.
20. Ramin M., Huhtanen P. Development of an in vitro method for determination of methane production kinetics using a fully automated in vitro gas system-a modelling approach. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 174:190-200.
21. Rymer C., Huntington J.A., Williams B.A., Givens D.I. In vitro cumulative gas production techniques: history, methodological considerations and challenges. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2005, 123/124:9-30.
22. Schofield P., Pitt R.E., Pell A.N. Kinetics of fibre digestion from in vitro gas production. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 72:2980-2991.
23. Sherrod P.H. Nonlinear Regression Analysis Program, NLREG Version 5.0 1995, Phillip H. Sherrod, Nashville, TN.
24. Shi Y., Weimer P.J., Ralph J. Formation of formate and hydrogen, and flux of reducing equivalents and carbon in Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1. Anton. Leeuw. Int. J. G. 1997, 72:101-109.
25. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B.M.T. Averyt, H.L. Miller (Eds.).
26. Sun X.Z., Hoskin S.O., Muetzel S., Molano G., Clark H. Effect of forage chicory (Cichorium intybus) and Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) on methane emissions in vitro and from sheep. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166/167:391-397.
27. Tugtas A.E., Pavlostathis S.G. Inhibitory effects of nitrogen oxides on a mixed methanogenic culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2007, 96:444-455.
28. van Zijderveld S.M., Gerrits W.J.J., Apajalahti J.A., Newbold J.R., Dijkstra J., Leng R.A., Perdok H.B. Nitrate and sulfate: effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 2010, 93:5856-5866.
29. Wang M., Tang S.X., Tan Z.L. Modeling in vitro gas production kinetics: derivation of Logistic-Exponential (LE) equations and comparison of models. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 165:137-150.
30. Wang M., Sun X.Z., Tang S.X., Tan Z.L., Pacheco D. Deriving fractional rate of degradation of logistic-exponential (LE) model to evaluate early in vitro fermentation. Animal 2013, 47:920-929.
31. Zinder S.H., Anguish T., Cardwell S.C. Selective inhibition by 2-bromoethanesulfonate of methanogenesis from acetate in a thermophilic anaerobic digestor. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 47:1343-1345.