The perspective of USDA APHIS veterinary services emergency management and diagnostics in preparing and responding to foreign animal diseases - Plans, strategies, and countermeasures

Developments in Biologicals

Volumn 135, Issue , 2013, Pages 15-22

  Díez, José R ^a   Styles, Darrel K ^a  

^a UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE   (United States)

Author keywords

Avian influenza; Control strategies; H5N1; HPAI

Indexed keywords

VACCINE;

ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; AVIAN INFLUENZA; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; EMERGENCY CARE; FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE; GOVERNMENT; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; VACCINATION; VETERINARY MEDICINE;

ANIMAL DISEASES; ANIMALS; COMMUNICABLE DISEASE CONTROL; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; VACCINES;

EID: 84881015465     PISSN: 14246074     EISSN: 16622960     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1159/000171016     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Torres A, David MJ, Bowman OP: Risk management of international trade: emergency preparedness. Rev sci tech Off Int Epiz 2002;21(3): 493-498.
2. Grubman MJ, Moraes MP, Schutta C, Barrera, Neilan J, Ettyreddy D, et al: Adenovirus serotype 5-vectored foot-and-mouth disease subunit vaccines: the first decade. Future Virol 2010;5(1): 51-64.
3. Doel TR: FMD vaccines. Virus Res 2003;91: 81-99.
4. Barnett PV, Carabin H: A review of emergency Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) vaccines. Vaccine 2002;20: 1505-1514.
5. Paarlberg PL, Seitzinger AH, Lee JG, Mathews KH: Economic Impacts of Foreign Animal Disease. USDA Economic Research Service 2008. Report No. 57.
6. Fraser D: Farm animal production: changing agriculture in a changing culture. J Appl Ani Welfare Sci 2001;4(3): 175-190.
7. Elbakidze L, Highfield L, Ward M, McCarl BA, Norby B: Economic analysis of mitigation strategies for FMD introduction in highly concentrated animal feeding regions. Rev Econ 2009;31(4): 931-950.
8. Bajardi P, Barrat A, Savini L, Colizza V: Optimizing surveillance for livestock disease spreading through animal movements. J R Soc Interface 2012;9(76): 2814-2825.
9. Styles DK, Gackstetter GD: Mass Animal Fatalities in Response to Animal Health Emergencies: Depopulation and Disposal of Livestock. in Death in Large Numbers. 2012. American Medical Association. Chapter 7: 201-218.
10. Live burial of pigs provokes mass uproar. The Korea Times National, January 16, 2011.
11. Swine Carcass Disposal Options for Routine and Catastrophic Mortality. (Issue Paper) Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. No. 39. 2008.
12. Ruminant Carcass Disposal Options for Routine and Catastrophic Mortality. (Issue Paper) Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. No. 41. 2009.
13. Gwyther CL, Williams AP, Golyshin PN, Edwards-Jones G, Jones DL: The environmental and biosecurity characteristics of livestock carcass disposal methods: A review. Waste Manage 2011;31(4): 767-778.
14. Park S: Pigs burial raises concerns over water contamination. The Korea Times National, January 3, 2011.
15. Kim H, Choi J, Kim M, Choi J, Lee M, Lee H, Jeon S, Bang S, et al: Development of Chemical Indicators of Groundwater Contamination Near the Carcass Burial Site. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting. 2011. #H41B-1029.
16. Pandya M, Pacheco JM, Bishop E, Kenney M, Milward F, Doel T, Golde WT: An alternate delivery system improves vaccine performance against foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV). Vaccine 2012;30(20): 3106-3111.