Extending stakeholder theory to promote resource management initiatives to key stakeholders: A case study of water transfers in Alberta, Canada

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 129, Issue , 2013, Pages 81-91

  Lafreniere, Katherine C ^a   Deshpande, Sameer ^a   Bjornlund, Henning ^a,b   Hunter, M Gordon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Narrative inquiry; Natural resource management; Stakeholder management; Stakeholder marketing; Water management; Water transfers

Indexed keywords

COMMERCE; DECISION MAKING; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ALBERTA; CASE-STUDIES; INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY; NARRATIVE INQUIRIES; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER MARKETING; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; WATER TRANSFERS; WATERS MANAGEMENTS;

MARKETING;

WATER;

DECISION MAKING; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; NATURAL RESOURCE; PERCEPTION; STAKEHOLDER; WATER EXCHANGE; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CASE STUDY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MARKETING; ORGANIZATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ALBERTA; CANADA;

NARRATIVE INQUIRY; NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER MANAGEMENT; STAKEHOLDER MARKETING; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER TRANSFERS;

ALBERTA; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; MARKETING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER RESOURCES;

EID: 84881013564     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.046     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Water for Life - Facts and Information on Water in Alberta, 2002 2002, Alberta Environment, Publication #I/930, Author, Edmonton, Alberta.
2. Background Information for Public Consultation on the SSRB's Draft Water Management Plan 2005, Alberta Environment, Government of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.
3. Agle B.R., Mitchell R.K., Sonnenfeld J.A. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 42(5):507-525.
4. Bankes N. The legal framework in Alberta for acquiring water entitlements from existing users. Alberta Law Review 2006, 4(2):323-376.
5. Beem B. Co-management from the top? The roles of policy entrepreneurs and distributive conflict in developing co-management arrangements. Marine Policy 2007, 31:540-549.
6. Beierle T.C. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions. Risk Analysis 2002, 22:739-749.
7. Belch G.E., Belch M.A., Guolla M.A. Advertising and Promotion: an Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective 2003, McGraw-Hill, Ryerson, Toronto.
8. Berkes F. Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90:1692-1702.
9. Bjornlund H., Nicol L., Klein K.K. Challenges in implementing economic instruments to manage irrigation water on farms in southern Alberta. Agriculture Water Management 2007, 92(3):131-141.
10. Bjornlund H., Nicol L., Klein K.K. The adoption of improved irrigation technology and management practices - a study of two irrigation districts in Alberta, Canada. Agriculture Water Management 2009, 96(1):121-131.
11. Bowie S.N. The moral obligations of multinational corporations. Problems of International Justice 1988, 97-113. Westview Press, Boulder, CO. S. Luper-Foy (Ed.).
12. Buysse K., Verbeke A. Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal 2003, 24(5):453-470.
13. Brugha R., Varvasovsky Z. Stakeholder analysis: a review. Health Policy and Planning 2000, 15:239-246.
14. Choi J., Wang H. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 2009, 30:895-907.
15. Going with the Flow? Evolving Water Allocations and the Potential and Limits of Water Markets in Canada 2008, Conference Board of Canada, POLIS Project and LOOP Initiative, Report, Prepared By: Brandes, O.M., Nowlan, L., Paris, K.
16. Côté J.K., Ericsson A., Law M.P. Tracing the development of athletes using retrospective interview methods: a proposed interview and validation procedure for reported information. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology 2005, 17(1):1-19.
17. Cutliffe J. Methodological issues in grounded theory. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2000, 31(6):1476-1484.
18. Dahl R.A. The concept of power. Behavior Science 1957, 2(3):201-215.
19. Deshpande S., Rundle-Thiele S. Segmenting and targeting American university students to promote responsible alcohol use: a case for applying social marketing principles. Health Marketing Quarterly 2011, 28(4):287-303.
20. Downward S.R., Taylor S. An assessment of Spain's Programa AGUA and its implications for sustainable water management in the province of Almería, southeast Spain. Journal of Environmental Management 2007, 82(2):277-289.
21. Edwards J., Cheers B., Bjornlund H. Social, economic and community impacts of water markets in Australia's Murray Darling basin region. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences 2008, 2(6):1-10.
22. Eriksson P., Kovalainen A. Qualitative Methods in Business Research 2008, SAGE Publications, Los Angeles.
23. Fenton M. ASurvey of Beliefs about Permanent Water Trading and Community Involvement in NRM in the Loddon-Campaspe Irrigation Region of Victoria 2007, Report, Prepared for:, North Central Catchment Management Authority Department of Primary Industries, Victoria.
24. Friedman A.L., Miles S. Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies 2002, 39(1):1-21.
25. Frooman J. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 1999, 24(2):191-205.
26. Ha Y., Hoch S.J. Ambiguity, processing strategy, and advertising-evidence interactions. Journal of Consumer Research 1989, 16(3):354-360.
27. Harrison J.S., Bosse D.A., Phillips R.A. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 2010, 31:58-74.
28. Henriques I., Sadorsky P. The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 42(1):87-99.
29. Higgins E.T., King G.A. Accessibility of social constructs: information processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. Personality, Cognition and Social Interaction 1981, 69-122. Erlbaum, Hillsdale. N. Cantor, J.F. Kihlstrom (Eds.).
30. Janiszewski C., Warlop L. The influence of classical conditioning procedures on subsequent attention to the conditioned brand. Journal of Consumer Research 1993, 20(2):171-189.
31. Jankowski P. Towards participatory geographic information systems for community-based environmental decision making. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(6):1966-1971.
32. Kuehne G., Bjornlund H. Custodians or investors - classifying irrigators in Australia's Namoi Valley. Sustainable Irrigation Management, Technologies and Policies 2006, 225-236. WIT Press, Southampton. G. Lorenzini, C.A. Brebbia (Eds.).
33. Lostarnau C., Oyarzún J., Maturana H., Soto G., Señoret M., Soto M., Rötting T.S., Amezaga J.M., Oyarzún R. Stakeholder participation within the public environmental system in Chile: major gaps between theory and practice. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92:2470-2478.
34. Massot E. Rocky View Utility Appeals Balzac Water Transfer: Westridge Plans to Seek Judiciary Review of Decision November 13, 2007, Rocky View Weekly.
35. Mayberry D., Crase L., Gullifer C. Categorising farming values as economic, conservation and lifestyle. Journal of Economic Psychology 2005, 26:59-72.
36. McCracken G. The Long Interview 1988, SAGE Publications, Newbury Park.
37. Mitchell R.K., Agle B.R., Wood D.J. Towards a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 1997, 22(4):853-886.
38. Nicol L., Bjornlund H., Klein K.K. Improved technologies and management practices in irrigation - implications for water saving in southern Alberta. Canadian Water Resources Journal 2008, 33(3):283-294.
39. Parent M.M., Deephouse D.L. Acase study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics 2007, 75:1-23.
40. Pfeffer J. Power in Organizations 1981, Pitman, Marshfield.
41. Reed M.S. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 2008, 141(10):2417-2431.
42. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 2009, 90(5):1933-1949.
43. Rowley T.J., Moldoveanu M. When will stakeholder groups act? an interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review 2003, 28(2):204-219.
44. Savage G.T., Nix T.W., Whitehead C.J., Blair J.D. Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Academy of Management Executive 1991, 5(2):61-75.
45. Shao X., Wang H., Wang Z. Interbasin transfer projects and their implications: a China case study. International Journal of River Basin Management 2003, 1(1):5-14.
46. Suchman M.C. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 1995, 20(3):571-610.
47. Verbeke A., Tung V. The future of stakeholder management theory: atemporal perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 2013, 112:529-543.
48. Yi Y. The effects of contextual priming in print advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research 1990, 17(2):215-222.