The engaging nature of teaching for competency development

Handbook of Research on Student Engagement

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 441-456

  Hipkins, Rosemary ^a  

^a New Zealand Council for Educational Research   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84881002881     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_21     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2006). Education for the knowledge age: Design centered models of teaching and instruction. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 695-713). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bolstad, R., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2005). Students as lifelong learners: Reflections on student data from the Curriculum Innovations Projects. Paper presented at the New Zealand Association for Research in Education annual conference, Dunedin, New Zealand, December. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. nzcer. org. nz/default. php?products_id=2714
3. Bolstad, R., & Gilbert, J. (2008). Disciplining and drafting, or 21st century learning? Rethinking the New Zealand senior secondary curriculum for the future. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
4. Bolstad, R., Roberts, J., Boyd, S., & Hipkins, R. (2009). Kick starts; Key competencies: Exploring the potential of participating and contributing. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
5. Carr, M. (2006). Dimensions of strength for key competencies. Retrieved February 10, 2008, from http://nzcur-riculum. tki. org. nz/curriculum_project_archives/references
6. Carr, M. (2008). Can assessment unlock and open the doors to resourcefulness and agency? In S. Swaffield (Ed.), Unlocking assessment. Understanding for reflection and application (pp. 36-54). London/New York: Routledge.
7. Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2010). "If things were simple. . . ": Complexity in education. Journal ofEvaluation in Clinical Practice, 16 856-860.
8. Delandshere, G., & Petrosky, A. (1998). Assessment of complex performances: Limitations of key measurement assumptions. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 14-24.
9. Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
10. Gee, J. (2008). A sociocultural perspective on opportunity to learn. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. Gee, E. Haertel, & L. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity and opportunity to learn (pp. 76-108). Cambridge, UK/New York/ Melbourne, Australia/Madrid, Spain/Cape Town, South Africa/Singapore/Sao Paulo, Brazil/Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press.
11. Gilbert, J. (2005). Catching the knowledge wave? The knowledge society and the future of education. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER Press.
12. Haertel, E., Moss, P., Pullin, D., & Gee, J. (2008). Introduction. In P. Moss, D. Pullin, J. Gee, E. Haertel, & L. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity and opportunity to learn (pp. 1-16). Cambridge, UK/New York/ Melbourne, Australia/Madrid, Spain/Cape Town, South Africa/Singapore/Sao Paulo, Brazil/Delhi, India: Cambridge University Press.
13. Harpaz, Y. (2007). Approaches to teaching thinking: Towards a conceptual mapping of the field. Teachers College Record, 109(8), 1845-1874.
14. Hipkins, R. (2006). The nature of the key competencies. A background paper. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://keycompetencies. tki. org. nz/Resourcebank/Introducing-key-competencies2/Key-resources
15. Hipkins, R. (2007). Assessing key competencies: Why would we? How could we? Retrieved February 10, 2009, from http://nzcurriculum. tki. org. nz/implemen-tation_packs_for_schools/assessing_key_competen-cies_why_would_we_how_could_we
16. Hipkins, R. (2010a). The evolving NCEA. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. nzcer. org. nz/default. php?products_id=2529
17. Hipkins, R., & Boyd, S. (2011). The recursive elaboration of key competencies as agents of curriculum change. Curriculum Matters, 7, 70-86
18. Hipkins, R., Bull, A., & Reid, A. (2010). Some reflections on the philosophical and pedagogical challenges of transforming education. Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 109-118.
19. Hipkins, R., Roberts, J., Bolstad, R., & Ferral, H. (2006). Staying in science 2: Transition to tertiary study from the perspectives of New Zealand Year 13 science students. Wellington, New Zealand: Report prepared for New Zealand Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST). Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www.nzcer.org.nz/pdfs/14605.pdf
20. Hipkins, R., Vaughan, K., with Beals, F., Ferral, H., & Gardiner, B. (2005). Shaping our futures: Meeting secondary students' learning needs in a time of evolving qualifications (Final report of the Learning Curves project). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. nzcer. org. nz/default. php?products_id=1583
21. Hipkins, R., Roberts, J., Bolstad, R., & Ferral, H. (2006). Staying in science 2: Transition to tertiary study from the perspectives of New Zealand Year 13 science students. Wellington, New Zealand: Report prepared for New Zealand Ministry of Research, Science and Technology (MoRST). Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. nzcer. org. nz/pdfs/14605. pdf
22. Hipkins, R., Vaughan, K., with Beals, F., Ferral, H., & Gardiner, B. (2005). Shaping our futures: Meeting secondary students' learning needs in a time of evolving qualifications (Final report of the Learning Curves project). Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. nzcer. org. nz/default. php?products_id=1583
23. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.
24. OECD. (2005). The definition and selection ofkey competencies: Executive summary. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367. pdf
25. Reid, A. (2006). Key competencies: a new way forward or more of the same? Curriculum Matters, 2, 43-62.
26. Russell, J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). Issues digest: Motivation and engagement. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government: Department of Education, Science and Training.
27. Rychen, D. (2004). An overarching conceptual framework for assessing key competences in an international context: Lessons from an interdisciplinary and policy-oriented approach. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. cedefop. europa. eu/etv/Upload/Projects_Networks/ResearchLab/ResearchReport/BgR1_Rychen. pdf
28. Rychen, D., & Salganik, L. (Eds.). (2003). Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society. Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe and Huber.
29. Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Wylie, C., Hipkins, R., & Hodgen, E. (2009). On the edge of adulthood: Young people's school and out-of-school experiences at 16. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Education. Retrieved November 25, 2010, from http://www. nzcer. org. nz/content/competent-learners-edge-adulthood. pdf
31. Wylie, C., & Hodgen, E. (2012). Trajectories and patterns of student engagement: Evidence from a longitudinal study. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 585-599). New York: Springer.