Playing with Numbers: A Methodological Critique of the Social Enterprise Growth Myth

Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 113-131

  Teasdale, S ^a   Lyon, F ^b   Baldock, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Critique; legitimacy; official statistics; social enterprise; social entrepreneurship

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880939714     PISSN: 19420676     EISSN: 19420684     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19420676.2012.762800     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Amin, A., Cameron, A. and Hudson, R. 2002. Placing the social economy, London: Routledge.
2. Atkinson, J., Tuohy, S. and Williams, C. 2006. Annual small business survey 2005, London: Department for Trade and Industry.
3. Bacq, S. and Jansenn, F. 2011. The multiple faces of social entrepreneurship: a review of definitional issues based on geographical and thematic criteria. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23 (5-6): 373 - 403. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2011.577242
4. Berger, P. and Luckman, T. 1966. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge, London: Allen Lane.
5. Blackburn, R. and Ram, M. 2006. Fix or fixation? The contributions and limitations of entrepreneurship and small firms to combating social exclusion. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 18 (1): 73 - 89. doi: 10.1080/08985620500419566
6. Bland, J. 2010. Social enterprise solutions for 21st century challenges: the UK model of social enterprise and experience, Finland: Publications of the Ministry of Employment and the Economy.
7. Blond, P. 2009. The ownership state, London: Respublica/Nesta.
8. Bridgstock, R. 2010. Diversity management for innovation in social enterprises in the UK. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22 (6): 557 - 574. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2010.488404
9. Brown, A. D. 1994. Politics, symbolic action and myth making in pursuit of legitimacy. Organization Studies, 15 (6): 861 - 878. doi: 10.1177/017084069401500605
10. Burke, K. 1966. Language as symbolic action: essays on life, literature and method, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
11. Campbell, B. L. 1985. Uncertainty as symbolic action in disputes among experts. Social Studies of Science, 15 (3): 429 - 453. doi: 10.1177/030631285015003002
12. Carmel, E. and Harlock, J. 2008. Instituting the third sector as a governable terrain: partnership, procurement and performance in the UK. Policy and Politics, 36 (2): 155 - 171. doi: 10.1332/030557308783995017
13. Chell, E., Nicolopoulou, K. and Karatas-Ozkan, M. 2010. Social entrepreneurship and enterprise: international and innovation perspectives. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22 (6): 485 - 493. doi: 10.1080/08985626.2010.488396
14. Dees, J. G. 1998. Enterprising nonprofits. Harvard Business Review, 76 (1): 55 - 67.
15. Defourny, J. and Nyssens, M. 2010. Conceptions of social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in Europe and the United States: convergences and differences. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1 (1): 32 - 53. doi: 10.1080/19420670903442053
16. Department for Trade and Industry (DTI). 2002. Social enterprise: a strategy for success, London: Department for Trade and Industry.
17. Department of Health. 2010. Press release: thousands of frontline NHS staff take control of £900 million of services. Department of Health, http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/MediaCentre/Pressreleases/DH_121692/ [Accessed 17 December 2011].
18. Dey, P. and Steyaert, C. 2010. The politics of narrating social entrepreneurship. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 4 (1): 85 - 108. doi: 10.1108/17506201011029528
19. Di Domenico, M., Tracey, P. and Haugh, H. 2009. Social economy involvement in public service delivery: community engagement and accountability. Regional Studies, 43 (7): 981 - 992. doi: 10.1080/00343400701874180
20. Diochon, M. and Anderson, A. 2009. Social enterprise and effectiveness: a process typology. Social Enterprise Journal, 5 (1): 7 - 29. doi: 10.1108/17508610910956381
21. ECOTEC. 2003. Guidance on mapping social enterprise, London: Department for Trade and Industry.
22. Giddens, A. 1998. The third way: the renewal of social democracy, Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life, New York: Doubleday.
24. Grenier, P. 2009. " Social entrepreneurship in the UK: from rhetoric to reality ". In An introduction to social entrepreneurship: voices, preconditions, contexts, Edited by: Ziegler, R. 174 - 207. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
25. Hampson, G. 2009. Complex calculations reveal 62,000 UK social enterprises. Social Enterprise Magazine,. Available from: http://www.socialenterpriselive.com/section/news/policy/20090728/complex-calculations-reveal-62000-uk-social-enterprises [Accessed 19 January 2013].
26. Haugh, H. and Kitson, M. 2007. The third way and the third sector: New Labour's economic policy and the social economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31 (6): 973 - 994. doi: 10.1093/cje/bem027
27. Treasury, H M. 1999. Enterprise and Social Exclusion, London: HM Treasury National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: Policy Action Team 3.
28. IFF Research. 2005. A survey of social enterprises across the UK, London: Small Business Service.
29. IFF Research,. 2008. Annual small business survey 2006/07, London: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.
30. Independent. 2005. Good for me, good for my party. The Economist, 24th November 2005. http://www.economist.com/node/5220307
31. Ipsos MORI. 2009. National survey of third sector organisations: technical report UK Data Archive Study Number 6381: National Survey of Third Sector Organisations, 2008/09
32. Kendall, J. 2000. The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: whys and wherefores. Policy & Politics, 28 (4): 541 - 562. doi: 10.1332/0305573002501135
33. Kenyon, M. and Crellin, J. 2001. Notes from social enterprise seminar, London: Department for Trade and Industry.
34. Kerlin, J. 2009. Social enterprise: a global comparison, New England: University Press of New England.
35. Kingdon, J. W. 1984. Agendas, alternatives and public policies, Boston: Longman. Reprinted 2011
36. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
37. Lyon, F. and Sepulveda, L. 2009. Mapping social enterprises: past approaches, challenges and future directions. Social Enterprise Journal, 5 (1): 83 - 94. doi: 10.1108/17508610910956426
38. Mawson, J. 2010. Social enterprise, strategic networks and regional development: the West Midlands experience. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30 (1/2): 66 - 83. doi: 10.1108/01443331011017047
39. Nicholls, A. 2010a. Institutionalizing social entrepreneurship in regulatory space: reporting and disclosure by community interest companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35 (4): 394 - 415. doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2009.08.001
40. Nicholls, A. 2010b. The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: reflexive isomorphism in a pre-paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 34 (4): 611 - 633. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00397.x
41. Office of the Third Sector (OTS). 2006. Social enterprise action plan: scaling new heights, London: Cabinet Office of the Third Sector.
42. Office of the Third Sector (OTS). 2009. Enterprising services, London: Cabinet Office of the Third Sector.
43. Parkinson, C. and Howorth, C. 2008. The language of social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 20 (3): 285 - 309. doi: 10.1080/08985620701800507
44. Peattie, K. and Morley, A. 2008. Eight paradoxes of the social enterprise research agenda. Social Enterprise Journal, 4 (2): 91 - 107. doi: 10.1108/17508610810901995
45. Peredo, A. M. and Chrisman, J. J. 2006. Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31 (2): 309 - 328. doi: 10.5465/AMR.2006.20208683
46. Rehn, A. 2008. On meta-ideology and moralization: a prolegomena to a critique of management studies. Organization, 15 (4): 598 - 609. doi: 10.1177/1350508408091009
47. Ridley-Duff, R. and Bull, M. 2011. Understanding social enterprise: theory and practice, London: Sage.
48. Simmons, R. 2008. Harnessing social enterprise for local public services: the case of new leisure trusts in the UK. Public Policy and Administration, 23 (3): 177 - 202. doi: 10.1177/0952076708089977
49. Smagorinsky, P. 1995. The social construction of data: methodological problems of investigating learning in the zone of proximal development. Review of Educational Research, 65 (3): 191 - 212.
50. Smith, G. and Teasdale, S. 2012. Associative democracy and the social economy: exploring the regulatory challenge. Economy and Society, 41 (2): 151 - 176. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2012.661627
51. Spear, R., Cornforth, C. and Aiken, M. 2009. The governance challenges of social enterprises: evidence from a UK empirical study. Annals of Public and Co-operative Economics, 80 (2): 247 - 273. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8292.2009.00386.x
52. Teasdale, S. 2012. What's in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 22 (2): 99 - 115. doi: 10.1177/0952076711401466
53. Teasdale, S., Alcock, P. and Smith, G. 2012. Legislating for the big society? The case of the public services (social value) bill. Public Money and Management, 32 (3): 139 - 155. doi: 10.1080/09540962.2012.676277
54. Teasdale, S. 2011. Exploring gender and social entrepreneurship: women's leadership, employment and participation in the third sector and social enterprises. Voluntary Sector Review, 2 (1): 57 - 76. doi: 10.1332/204080511X560620
55. Westall, A. 2001. Value led, market driven: social enterprise solutions to public policy goals, London: IPPR.
56. Young, N. M. 2011. Social enterprise coalition rebrands as social enterprise UK, Civil Society. http://www.civilsociety.co.uk/finance/news/content/10183/social_enterprise_coalition_rebrands_as_social_enterprise_uk [Accessed 19 January 2013].
57. Zimmerman, M. A. and Zeitz, G. J. 2002. Beyond survival: achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. The Academy of Management Review, 27 (3): 414 - 431.
58. Zott, C. and Huy, Q. 2007. How entrepreneurs use symbolic management to acquire resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (1): 70 - 105. doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.1.70