Comparison of fluid absorption between transurethral enucleation and transurethral resection for benign prostate hyperplasia

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 26-30

  Ran, Longfei ^a   He, Weiyang ^a   Zhu, Xin ^a   Zhou, Qingsong ^a   Gou, Xin ^a  

^a CHONGQING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Benign prostate hyperplasia; Fluid absorption; Transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate; Transurethral plasma kinetic resection of prostate

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ABSORPTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CATHETERIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FLUID ABSORPTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE SURGERY; PROSTATE VOLUME; PROSTATE WEIGHT; TRANSURETHRAL PLASMA KINETIC ENUCLEATION OF PROSTATE; TRANSURETHRAL PLASMA KINETIC RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; WOUND IRRIGATION;

ABSORPTION; AGED; ETHANOL; HEMATOCRIT; HEMOGLOBINS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; SODIUM; TIME FACTORS; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE;

EID: 84880922728     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: 14230399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000348793     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Liu C, Zheng Sh, Li Hu, et al: Transurethral enucleation and resection of prostate in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia by plasma kinetics. J Urol 2010; 184: 2440-2445.
2. Zhang K, Xing J, Chen B, et al: Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate vs transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate: pre-and postoperative comparisons of parameters used in assessing benign prostatic enlargement. Singapore Med J 2011; 52: 747-751.
3. Zhao Z, Zeng G, Zhong W, et al: A prospective, randomised trial comparing plasmakinetic enucleation to standard transurethral resection of the prostate for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: three-year followup results. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 752-758.
4. Hahn RG: Ethanol monitoring of irrigating fluid absorption in transurethral prostatic surgery. Anaesthesiology 1988; 68: 867-873.
5. Hahn RG: Fluid and electrolyte dynamics during development of the TURP syndrome. Br J Urol 1990; 66: 79-84.
6. Madersbacher S, Marberger M: Is transurethral resection of the prostate still justified? BJU Int 1999; 83: 227-237.
7. Zhang KY, Xing JC, Chen BS, et al: Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate vs. transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate: pre-and postoperative comparisons of parameters used in assessing benign prostatic enlargement. Singapore Med J 2011; 52: 747-751.
8. Naikai L, Jianjun YA: Study comparing plasmakinetic enucleation to bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 2012; 26: 884-888.
9. Zhu L, Chen S, Yang S, et al: Plasmakinetic enucleation versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 ml: A prospective, randomised trial with 5-year follow-up. J Urol 2012; 10: 117.
10. Hahn RG: Early detection of the TUR syndrome by marking the irrigating fluid with 1% ethanol. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1989; 33: 146-151.
11. Cetinkaya M, Ulusoy E, OÈztuÈrk B, et al: Transurethral resection or electrovaporization in the treatment of BPH. Br J Urol 1998; 81: 652-654.
12. Chen SS, Chiu AW, Lin ATL, et al: Clinical outcome at 3 months after transurethral vaporization of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1997; 50: 235-238.
13. Akçayöz M, Kaygisiz O, Akdemir O, et al: Comparison of transurethral resection and plasmakinetic transurethral resection applications with regard to fluid absorption amounts in benign prostate hyperplasia. Urol Int 2000; 77: 143-147.
14. Cetinkaya M, Oztürk B, Akdemir, et al: A comparison of fluid absorption during transurethral resection and transurethral vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2000; 86: 820-823.
15. Konrad C, Gerber HR, Schuepfer G, et al: Transurethral resection syndrome: effect of the introduction into clinical practice of a new method for monitoring fluid absorption. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 360-365.
16. Hahn RG, Ekengren JC: Patterns of irrigating fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate as indicated by ethanol. J Urol 1993; 149: 502-506.
17. Hahn RG: Prevention of TUR syndrome by detection of trace ethanol in the expired breath. Anaesthesia 1990; 45: 577-581.
18. Hahn RG: Ethanol monitoring of extravascular absorption of irrigating fluid. Br J Urol 1993; 72: 766-769.
19. Hahn RG: Life-threatening transurethral resection syndrome despite monitoring of fluid absorption with ethanol. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1995; 12: 431-433.
20. Hahn RG: The use of ethanol to monitor fluid absorption during transurethral resection of the prostate. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1999; 33: 277-283.
21. Oester A, Madsen PO: Determination of absorption of irrigating fluid during transurethral resection of the prostate by means of radioisotopes. J Urol 1969; 102: 714-719.
22. Hahn RG: Calculation of irrigant absorption by measurement of breath alcohol level during transurethral resection of the prostate. Br J Urol 1991; 68: 390-393.