Bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate vs. transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate: Pre- and postoperative comparisons of parameters used in assessing benign prostatic enlargement

Singapore Medical Journal

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 747-751

  Zhang, K Y ^a   Xing, J C ^a   Chen, B S ^b   Liu, C X ^b   Lau, H W ^c   Sim, H G ^c   Foo, K T ^c  

^a FUJIAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SOUTHERN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SINGAPORE GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Benign prostatic enlargement; Enucleation; Prostate; Resection

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERNATIONAL PROSTATE SYMPTOM SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTVOID RESIDUAL URINE VOLUME; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTATE HYPERTROPHY; PROSTATE SURGERY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TRANSURETHRAL ENUCLEATION AND RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UROFLOWMETRY;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF PROSTATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80054771970     PISSN: 00375675     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol 2007; 177:1419-22.
2. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol 2006; 50:969-70.
3. Lim KB, Wong MY, Foo, KT. Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) through the decades-a comparison of results over the last thirty years in a single institution in Asia. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2004; 33:775-9.
4. Roos, NP, Wennberg, JE, Malenka, D J, et al. M ortality a nd reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:1120-24.
5. Roos, NP, Ramsey EW. A population-based study of prostatectomy: outcomes associated with differing surgical approaches. J Urol 1987; 137:1184-8.
6. Liu CX. Real Endo-enucleation of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Endourol 2006; 20 Suppl 1:A307.
7. Yuen, JS, Ngiap JT, Cheng, CW, Foo KT. Effects of bladder volume on transabdominal ultrasound measurements of intravesical prostatic protrusion and volume. Int J Urol 2002; 9:225-9.
8. Blandy JP, Notley RG, Reynard JM. Transurethral Resection. 5th ed. Taylor and Francis: London 2005.
9. Roehrborn CG. The Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol Clin North Am 1995; 22:445-53.
10. Wilson LC, Gilling PJ, Williams A, et al. A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years. Eur Urol 2006; 50:569-73.
11. Kuntz RM. Current role of lasers in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Eur Urol 2006; 49:961-9.
12. Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial. J Urol 2004; 172:1404-8.
13. Jepsen JV, Bruskewitz RC. Recent developments in the surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1998;51:23-31.
14. Liu C, Zheng SB, Li HL, et al. Enucleation of prostate with Gyrus bipolar system. J Endourol 2007; 21Suppl1:A18.
15. Shimizu Y, Hiraoka Y, Iwamoto K, Takahashi H, Abe H. Measurement of residual adenoma after transurethral resection of the prostate by transurethral enucleation technique. Urol Int 2005; 74:102-7.
16. Hiraoka Y, Shimizu Y, Iwamoto K, Takahashi H, Abe H. Trial of complete detachment of the whole prostate lobes in benign prostate hyperplasia by transurethral enucleation of the prostate. Urol Int 2007; 79:50-4.
17. Hiraoka Y. A new method of prostatectomy, transurethral detachment and resection of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi 1983; 50:896-8.
18. Hiraoka Y, Akimoto M. Transurethral enucleation of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1989; 142:1247-50.
19. Nakagawa K, Ide H. Transurethral Enucleation With Bipolar (TUEB) for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: the initial experiences with the novel device. J Endourol 2007; 21 Suppl 1:A18.
20. Kuntz RM, Lehrich K, Ahyai SA. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates greater than 100 grams: 5-year follow-up results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 2008; 53:160-6.
21. Chen SS, Hong JG, Hsiao YJ, and Chang LS. The correlation between clinical outcome and residual prostatic weight ratio after transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2000; 85:79-82.
22. Aus G, Bergdahl S, Frosing R, et al. Reference range of prostatespecific antigen after transurethral resection of the prostate. Urology 1996; 47:529-31.
23. Tinmouth WW, Habib E, Kim SC, et al. Change in serum prostate specific antigen concentration after holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a marker for completeness of adenoma resection? J Endourol 2005; 19:550-4.