Some effects of a reduced relational vocabulary on the Whodunit problem

IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 411-416

  Halstead, Daniel T ^a   Forbus, Kenneth D ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CASE DESCRIPTION; EXEMPLAR-BASED; KEY ISSUES; OVERFITTING; SIMILAR CASE; TRAINING DATA;

ALGORITHMS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84880899500     PISSN: 10450823     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Agrawal, R., Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H., & Varkamo, A. I. (1996). Fast discovery of association rules. In Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurusamy, R. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI Press.
2. Anderson, B., & Moore, A. (1998). ADTrees for Fast Counting and for Fast Learning of Association Rules. Knowledge Discovery from Databases, New York, 1998.
3. Blockeel, H., & Uwents, W. (2004). Using neural networks for relational learning. ICML-2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and its Connection to Other Fields, pp.23-28.
4. Cohn, D., & Hofmann, T. (2001). The missing link - a probabilistic model of document content and hypertext connectivity. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13:430-436, MIT Press.
5. Corcho, O. and Gomez-Perez, A. (2000). A Roadmap to Ontology Specification Languages, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Volume 1937, Jan 2000, p. 80
6. Dayanik, A. and Nevill-Manning, C.G. (2004). Clustering in Relational Biological Data. ICML-2004 Workshop on Statistical Relational Learning and Connections to Other Fields, pp. 42-47
7. Eliasmith, C. and Thagard, P. 2001. Integrating structure and meaning: A distributed model of connectionist mapping. Cognitive Science.
8. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. and Gentner, D. The Structure-Mapping Engine. Proceedings of the Fifth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1986.
9. Forbus, K. Exploring analogy in the large. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K., and Kokinov, B. Analogy: Perspectives from Cognitive Science. MIT Press. 2001.
10. Forbus, K., Gentner, D., and Law, K. MAC/FAC: A model of similarity-based retrieval. Cognitive Science, 19, 141-205. 1994.
11. Gentner, D. Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy, Cognitive Science 7(2), 1983
12. Getoor, L., Friedman, N., Koller, D., & Pfeffer, A. Learning probabilistic relational models. In Dzeoski, S. and Lavrac, N. (Eds.), Relational Data Mining (pp. 307-335). Kluwer, 2001.
13. nd International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC, 2003.
14. Halstead, D., & Forbus, K. (2005). Transforming between Propositions and Features: Bridging the Gap. Proceedings of AAAI-2005. Pittsburgh, PA.
15. Hummel, J.E., & Holyoak, K.J. (1997). Distributed representations of structure: A theory of analogical access and mapping. Psychological Review, 104.
16. Kersting, K., de Raedt, L., & Kramer, S. (2000). Interpreting Bayesian logic programs. Proc. AAAI-2000 Workshop on Learning Statistical Models from Relational Data, pp. 29-35.
17. Kuehne, S. E., Gentner, D. & Forbus, K. D. (2000). Modeling infant learning via symbolic structural alignment. Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 286-291.
18. Leake, D. (Ed.) 1996. Case-based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons and Future Directions, MIT Press.
19. Mitchell, M. (1993) Analogy-making as perception: A computer model. MITPress.