True polyandry and pseudopolyandry: Why does a monandrous fly remate?

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Fisher, David N ^a   Doff, Rowan J ^b   Price, Tom A R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Copulation duration; Infertility; Monandry; Plasticity; Polyandry; Social environment; Sperm competition

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; COPULATION; FEMALE; FLY; FRUIT; GENE FLOW; PLASTICITY; POLYANDRY; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SPERM COMPETITION; STARVATION;

CANADA; ENGLAND; GREECE; SPAIN; UNITED KINGDOM;

DROSOPHILA SUBOBSCURA;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COPULATION; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COPULATION; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION; MALE;

EID: 84880882418     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-157     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects. Arnqvist G, Nilsson T, Anim Behav 2000 60 2 145 164 10.1006/anbe.2000.1446 10973716
2. The evolution of polyandry: an examination of the genetic incompatability and good-sperm hypotheses. Simmons LW, J Evol Biol 2001 14 585 594 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00309.x (Pubitemid 32778823)
3. The consequences of polyandry for population viability, extinction risk and conservation. Holman L, Kokko H, Phil Trans R Soc B 2013 368 20120053 10.1098/rstb.2012.0053 23339244
4. Gene flow is maintained by polyandry and male dispersal in the army ant Eciton burchellii. Jaffé R, Moritz RFA, Kraus FB, Popul Ecol 2009 51 227 236 10.1007/s10144-008-0133-1
5. Parasites, pathogens and polyandry in social hymenoptera. Sherman PW, Seeley TD, Reeve HK, Am Nat 1988 131 4 602 610 10.1086/284809 (Pubitemid 19321016)
6. Sexually transmitted diseases: a possible cost of promiscuity in birds. Poiani A, Wilks C, Auk 2000 117 4 1061 1065
7. Polyandry prevents extinction. Price TA, Hurst GD, Wedell N, Current biology: CB 2010 20 5 471 475 10.1016/j.cub.2010.01.050 20188561
8. Parent-offspring conflict. Trivers RL, Amer Zool 1974 14 249 264
9. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Hughes WO, Oldroyd BP, Beekman M, Ratnieks FL, Science 2008 320 5880 1213 1216 10.1126/science.1156108 18511689 (Pubitemid 351929509)
10. Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionfly Harpobittacs nigriceps. Thornhill R, Am Nat 1983 122 6 765 788 10.1086/284170 (Pubitemid 15272034)
11. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Parker GA, Biol Rev 1970 45 525 567 10.1111/j.1469-185X.1970.tb01176.x
12. Monogamy and the battle of the sexes. Hosken DJ, Stockley P, Tregenza T, Wedell N, Annu Rev Entomol 2009 54 361 378 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090608 18793102
13. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns: water striders as a model system. Rowe L, Arnqvist G, Sih A, Krupa JJ, Trends Ecol Evol 1994 9 289 293 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90032-9 21236857 (Pubitemid 2106637)
14. Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview. Parker GA, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006 361 1466 235 259 10.1098/rstb.2005.1785 16612884 (Pubitemid 44870111)
15. Regulation of sexual receptivity of female Mediterranean fruit flies: old hypotheses revisited and a new synthesis proposed. Mossinson S, Yuval B, J Insect Physiol 2003 49 6 561 567 10.1016/S0022-1910(03)00027-1 12804715 (Pubitemid 36738375)
16. The evolution of polyandry I: intragenomic conflict and genetic incompatability. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1996 263 1377 1711 1717 10.1098/rspb.1996.0250 (Pubitemid 27055566)
17. The evolution of polyandry II: post-copulatory defences against genetic incompatability. Zeh JA, Zeh DW, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1997 264 69 75 10.1098/rspb.1997.0010 (Pubitemid 27067932)
18. Polyandry as a mediator of sexual selection before and after mating. Kvarnemo C, Simmons LW, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2013 368 1613 20120042 10.1098/rstb.2012.0042 23339234
19. Extra-pair copulations in a predominately monogamous birds: observations of behaviour. Westneat DF, Anim Behav 1987 35 865 876 10.1016/S0003-3472(87) 80122-7
20. Female multiple mating in wild and laboratory populations of the two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata. Haddrill PR, Shuker DM, Amos W, Majerus ME, Mayes S, Mol Ecol 2008 17 13 3189 3197 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03812.x 18522693 (Pubitemid 351861456)
21. Simmons LW, Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press 2001
22. Temporal patterns in reproduction may explain variationin mating frequencies in the green-veined white butterfly Pieris napi. Välimäki P, Kaitala A, Kokko H, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2006 61 1 99 107 10.1007/s00265-006-0240-y (Pubitemid 44511500)
23. The heritability of multiple male mating in a promiscuous mammal. McFarlane SE, Lane JE, Taylor RW, Gorrell JC, Coltman DW, Humphries MM, Boutin S, McAdam AG, Biol Lett 2011 7 3 368 371 10.1098/rsbl.2010.1003 21159688
24. Sexual responsiveness is condition-dependent in female guppies, but preference functions are not. Syriatowicz A, Brooks R, BMC Ecol 2004 4 5 10.1186/1472-6785-4-5 15117410 (Pubitemid 38761952)
25. Female nutritional status determines the magnitude and sign of responses to a male ejaculate signal in Drosophila melanogaster. Fricke C, Bretman A, Chapman T, J Evol Biol 2010 23 1 157 165 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2009.01882.x 19888937
26. Does a lack of mating opportunites explain monandry in the green-veined white butterly (Pieris napi)? Välimäki P, Kaitala A, Oikos 2006 115 110 116 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14947.x (Pubitemid 44521324)
27. Heritable variation in polyandry in Callosobruchus chinensis. Harano T, Miyatake T, Anim Behav 2005 70 2 299 304 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.10.023 (Pubitemid 40968682)
28. Remating in the laboratory reflects rates of polyandry in the wild. Price TAR, Lewis Z, Smith DT, Hurst GDD, Wedell N, Anim Behav 2011 82 6 1381 1386 10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.09.022
29. Evolution of mitrochondrial DNA in Drosophila subobscura. Latorre A, Moya A, Ayala FJ, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986 83 8649 8653 10.1073/pnas.83.22.8649 16578796
30. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Carlson ML, Berrigan D, Serra L, Science 2000 287 308 309 10.1126/science.287.5451.308 10634786 (Pubitemid 30046758)
31. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Davis JR, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S, Nature 1998 391 783 786 10.1038/35842 9486646 (Pubitemid 28099674)
32. Global genetic change tracks global climate warming in Drosophila subobscura. Balanya J, Oller JM, Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Serra L, Science 2006 313 5794 1773 1775 10.1126/science.1131002 16946033 (Pubitemid 44454151)
33. Fertility, mating behaviour and sexual selection in Drosophila subobscura. Maynard Smith J, J Genet 1956 54 2 261 279 10.1007/BF02982781
34. What use is an infertile sperm? A comparative study of sperm-heteromorphic drosophila. Holman L, Freckleton RP, Snook RR, Evolution 2008 62 2 374 385 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00280.x 18053077 (Pubitemid 351294554)
35. Perception of male-male competition influences Drosophila copulation behaviour even in species where females rarely remate. Lizé A, Doff RJ, Smaller EA, Lewis Z, Hurst GD, Biol Lett 2012 8 1 35 38 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0544 21752815
36. The genetics of Drosophila subobscura populatios XVIII. Multiple insemination and sperm displacement in Drosophila subobscura. Loukas M, Vergini Y, Krimbas CB, Genetica 1981 57 29 37 10.1007/BF00057540
37. Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness. Bretman A, Fricke C, Chapman T, Proceedings Biological sciences / The Royal Society 2009 276 1662 1705 1711 10.1098/rspb.2008.1878 19324834
38. Experience of mating rivals causes males to modulate sperm transfer in the fly Drosophila pseudoobscura. Price TAR, Lizé A, Marcello M, Bretman A, J Insect Physiol 2012 58 1669 1675 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.10.008 23085556
39. Drosophila melanogaster males increase the number of sperm in their ejaculate when perceiving rival males. Garbaczewska M, Billeter JC, Levine JD, J Insect Physiol 2013 59 3 306 310 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2012.08.016 23178803
40. Seminal fluid protein allocation and male reproductive success. Wigby S, Sirot LK, Linklater JR, Buehner N, Calboli FC, Bretman A, Wolfner MF, Chapman T, Current biology: CB 2009 19 9 751 757 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.036 19361995
41. Perceived sperm competition intensity influences seminal fluid protein production prior to courtship and mating. Fedorka KM, Winterhalter WE, Ware B, Evolution 2011 65 2 584 590 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01141.x 21271997
42. Courtship feeding in Drosophila subobscura. I. The nutritional significance of courtship feeding. Steele RH, Anim Behav 1986 34 1087 1098 10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80168-3
43. When are vomiting males attractive? Sexual selection on condition-dependent nuptial feeding in Drosophila subobscura. Immonen E, Hoikkala A, Kazem AJN, Ritchie MG, Behav Ecol 2009 20 2 289 295 10.1093/beheco/arp008
44. Variations of box plots. McGill R, Tukey JW, Larsen WA, Am Stat 1978 32 1 12 16
45. The implication of survival rates in natural populations of Drosophila: capture-recapture experiments on domestic speceis. Rosewell J, Shorrocks B, Biol J Linn Soc 1987 32 373 384 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1987.tb00438.x
46. Powell J, Progress and prospects in evolutionary biology: the Drosophila model Oxford: Oxford University Press 1997
47. Genetics of natural populations X. Dispersion rates in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Dobzhansky T, Wright S, Genetics 1943 28 304 340 17247091
48. The study of mate choice. Halliday TR, Mate choice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Bateson P, 1983
49. Remating by female Mediterranean fruit flies (Ceratitis capitata, Diptera: Tephritidae): temporal patterns and modulation by male condition. Gavriel S, Gazit Y, Yuval B, J Insect Physiol 2009 55 7 637 642 10.1016/j.jinsphys.2009.04.002 19482138
50. Polyandry and fecundity in the Lepidoptera: can methodological and conceptual approaches bias outcomes? Torres-Vila LM, Rodriguez-Molina MC, Jennions MD, Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2004 55 4 315 324 10.1007/s00265-003-0712-2 (Pubitemid 38204074)
51. Comparative evidence for the evolution of genitalia by sexual selection. Arnqvist G, Nature 1998 393 784 786 10.1038/31689 (Pubitemid 28299488)
52. Thornhill R, Alcock J, The evolution of insect mating systems Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1983
53. Eberhard WG, Female control: sexual selection by cryptic female choice Princeton: Princeton University Press 1996
54. Sexually transmitted infections in polygamous mating systems. Ashby B, Gupta S, Phil Trans R Soc B 2013 368 20120048 10.1098/rstb.2012.0048 23339239
55. Drosophila female sexual behavior induced by sterile males showing copulation complementation. Xue L, Noll M, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000 97 7 3272 3275 10.1073/pnas.97.7.3272 10725377 (Pubitemid 30183291)
56. Mating frequency and fertility of mediterranean fruit fly females alternately mated with normal and irradiated males. Katiyar KP, Ramirez E, J Econ Entomol 1970 63 4 1248 1250
57. Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Chapman T, Miyatake T, Smith HK, Partridge L, Proceedings Biological sciences / The Royal Society 1998 265 1408 1879 1894 10.1098/rspb.1998.0516 9802244 (Pubitemid 28477376)
58. Influence of male diet on male mating success and longevity and female remating in the Medeterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) under laboratory conditions. Shelley TE, Kennelly S, Florida Entomol 2002 85 4 572 579 10.1653/0015-4040(2002)085[0572:IOMDOM]2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 36137625)
59. Remating by Gypsy Moths (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) Mated wth F1-Sterile Males as a Function of Sperm Within the Spermatheca. Proshold FI, J Econ Entomol 1995 88 3 644 648
60. Relationship of Multiple mating to Fertility in Atteva punctella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Taylor OR, Ann Entomol Soc Am 1967 60 3 583 590
61. Measuring polyandry in wild populations: a case study using promiscuous crickets. Bretman A, Tregenza T, Mol Ecol 2005 14 7 2169 2179 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02556.x 15910335 (Pubitemid 40772430)
62. Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Kokko H, Jennions MD, J Evol Biol 2008 21 4 919 948 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x 18462318 (Pubitemid 351832275)
63. Fighting fruit flies: a model system for the study of aggression. Chen S, Lee AY, Bowens NM, Huber R, Kravitz EA, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002 99 8 5664 5668 10.1073/pnas.082102599 11960020 (Pubitemid 34411607)
64. Exposure to rivals and plastic responses to sperm competition in Drosophila melanogaster. Bretman A, Fricke C, Hetherington P, Stone R, Chapman T, Behav Ecol 2010 21 2 317 321 10.1093/beheco/arp189
65. Quick-change artists: male plastic behavioural responses to rivals. Bretman A, Gage MJ, Chapman T, Trends Ecol Evol 2011 26 9 467 473 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.002 21680050
66. Males do not prolong copulation in response to competitor males in the polyandrous fly Drosophila bifasciata. Lizé A, Price TAR, Marcello M, Smaller EA, Lewis Z, Hurst GDD, Physiol Entomol 2012 37 3 227 232 10.1111/j.1365-3032.2012.00836.x
67. Why it is difficult to model sperm displacement in Drosophila melanogaster: the realtionship between sperm transfer and copulation duration. Gilchrist AS, Partridge L, Evolution 2000 54 2 534 542 10937230 (Pubitemid 30263928)
68. Intraspecific variation in estrogen receptor alpha and the expression of male sociosexual behavior in two populations of prairie voles. Cushing BS, Razzoli M, Murphy AZ, Epperson PM, Le WW, Hoffman GE, Brain Res 2004 1016 2 247 254 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.05.010 15246861 (Pubitemid 38887708)
69. Anaesthitising Drosophila for behavioural studies. Barron AB, J Insect Physiol 2000 46 439 442 10.1016/S0022-1910(99)00129-8 12770207 (Pubitemid 30148547)
70. The distribution and abundance of the British fungal breeding Drosophila. Shorrocks B, Charlesworth P, Ecol Entomol 1980 5 61 78 10.1111/j.1365-2311. 1980.tb01124.x
71. The insemination reaction in intraspecific matings of Drosophila. Wheeler NR, Univ Texas Publ 1947 4720 78 115
72. Thermal environment during and outside courtship jointly determine female remating rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Best AR, Lewis Z, Hurst GDD, Lizé A, Anim Behav 2012 83 6 1483 1490 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.022
73. R: A language for data analysis and graphics. Ihaka R, Gentleman R, J Comput Graph Stat 1996 5 3 299 314