Bundle with care - Rethinking medicare incentives for post-acute care services

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 369, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 400-401

  Feder, Judith ^a,b  

^a URBAN INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST CONTROL; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE NEED; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH SERVICE; HOME HEALTH AGENCY; HUMAN; MEDICAID; MEDICARE; NURSING HOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REWARD; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SHORT SURVEY;

EID: 84880879506     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMp1302730     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Newhouse JP, Price M, Huang J, McWilliams JM, Hsu J. Steps to reduce favorable risk selection in Medicare Advantage largely succeeded, boding well for health insurance exchanges. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31:2618-28.
2. Christman E. Current issues in home health payments. Presented to the Medicare Payment Assessment Commission, November 5, 2009 (http://www.medpac.gov/ transcripts/variation%20presentation-2003.pdf).
3. Newhouse JP, Buntin M, Chapman JD. Risk adjustment and Medicare: taking a closer look. Health Aff (Millwood) 1997;16:16-43.
4. Policy options to sustain Medicare for the future. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation, January 2013.
5. Institute of Medicine. Interim report of the Committee on Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending and Promotion of High-Value Health Care: preliminary committee observations, March 2013 (http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php? record-id=18308&page=26).