Qualitative analysis of individual and composite content factors of stereoscopic 3D video causing visual discomfort

Displays

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 223-240

  Kim, Dong Wook ^a   Yoo, Ji Sang ^a   Seo, Young Ho ^a  

^a Kwangwoon University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Content production guideline; Discomfort factors; Disparity; Stereo 3D contents; Viewer's safety

Indexed keywords

3D CONTENT; CONTENT PRODUCTION; DISCOMFORT FACTORS; DISPARITY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE FACTORS; QUANTITATIVE VALUES; SITUATIONAL FACTORS;

DISPLAY DEVICES; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84880874915     PISSN: 01419382     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2013.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. O. Schreer, P. Kauff, and T. Sikora 3D Video Communications 2005 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Atrium, England
2. Q. Huynu-Thu, M. Barkowsky, and P.L. Callet The importance of visual attention in improving the 3D-TV viewing experience: overview and new perspectives IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 57-1 2011 421 431
3. IWA3: ISO, International Workshop Agreement 3, 2005.
4. 3D Consortium, 3DC Safety Guideline for Popularization of Human-friendly 3D, 2006.
5. Telecommunications Technology Association (TTA), 3DTV Broadcasting Safety Guideline TTAK.KO-07.0086, December 23rd, 2010.
6. T. Inoue, K. Uehira, K. Komiya, M. Suzuki, Human factors of 3-D displays for visual reality, in: IEEE Industrial Application Society Annual Meeting 2008, pp. 1-4.
7. D.H. Chung, and H.C. Yang Exploratory analysis of 3D stereoscopic video measurement Journal of the KSDIM 6-4 2010 225 235
8. Matthias WÅpking Viewing comfort with stereoscopic pictures: an experimental study on the subjective effects of disparity magnitude and depth of focus Journal of the Society for Information Display 3/3 1995 101 103
9. L. Stelach, W. Tam, F. Speranza, R. Renaud, and T. Martin Improving the visual comfort of stereoscopic images Proceedings of SPIE 5006 2003 269 282
10. W. Ijsselsteijn, H. Ridder, and J. Vliegen Subjective evaluation of stereoscopic images: effects of camera parameters and display duration IEEE Transactions on CSVT 10-2 2000 145 154
11. R. Woods, T. Docherty, and R. Koch Image distortion in stereoscopic video systems Proceedings of SPIE 1915 1993 36 48
12. ITU, Subjective Assessment of Stereoscopic Television Pictures, ITU Recommendation BT. 1438, 2000.
13. C. Erkelens Fusional limit for a large random-dot stereogram Vision Research 28 1998 345 353
14. T. Iwasaki, T. Kubota, and A. Tawara The tolerance range of binocular disparity on a 3D display based on the physiological characteristics of ocular accommodation Display 30 2009 44 48
15. S. Yano, S. Ide, T. Mitsuhashi, and H. Thwaites A study of visual fatigue and visual comfort for 3D HDTV/HDTV images Displays 23 2002 191 201 (Pubitemid 35213903)
16. T. Alpert, and J. Evain Subjective quality evaluation the SSCQE and DSCQE methodologies EBU Technical Review 1997 12 20 (Pubitemid 127646187)
17. S. Yano, M. Emoto, and T. Mitsuhashi Two factors in visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV images Displays 25 2004 141 150
18. F. Kooi, and A. Toet Visual comfort of binocular and 3D displays Displays 25 2004 99 108
19. R.H.Y. So, W.S. Wong, R. Yip, A. Lam, and P. Ting Benefits of matching accommodative demands to vergence demands in a binocular head-mounted display: a study on stereo fusion times Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 20 6 2011 545 558
20. D. Hoffman, A. Girshick, A. Akeley, and M. Banks Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue Journal of Vision 8:33 3 2008 1 30
21. H. Li, J. Seo, K. Kham, S. Lee, Measurement of 3D visual fatigue using event-related potential (ERP): 3D oddball paradigm, in: IEEE 3DTV-Con08, 2008.
22. H.C. Li Human factor research on the measurement of subjective three dimensional fatigue Journal of Broadcast Engineering 15-5 2010 607 616
23. D.H. Kim, S.H. Choi, and K.H. Sohn Visual fatigue prediction for stereoscopic video considering individual fusional characteristics Journal of Broadcast Engineering 16-2 2011 331 338
24. N.K. Kim Human factors for 3D stereoscopic images Journal of Information Scientists and Engineering 29-8 2011 48 54
25. M. Lambooij, W.A. Ijsselsteijn, and I. Heynderickx Visual discomfort of 3D TV: assessment methods and modeling Displays 32 2011 209 218
26. M. Lambooij, M. Fortuin, I. Heynderickx, and W.A. IJsselsteijn Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: a review Journal of Imaging Science and Technology 53 3 2009 030201-1 030201-14
27. W.J. Tam, F. Speranza, S. Yano, K. Shimono, and H. Ono Stereoscopic 3D-TV: visual comfort IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting 57 2 2011 335 346
28. http://bigient.com/en/sub/work-01-02.php.
29. http://3d.dima.ac.kr/3Dgallery/index.asp?category=1.
30. Y. Nojiri, H. Yamanoue, S. Ide, S. Yano, and F. Okana Parallex distribution and visual comfort on stereoscopic HDTTV Proceedings of the IBC 2006 373 380
31. F. Speranza, W.J. Tam, R. Renaud, and N. Hur Effect of disparity and motion on visual comfort of stereoscopic images Proceedings of the Stereoscopic Display and Visual Reality System, xiii 6055 2006 60550B-1-9
32. R.C. Gonzalez, and R.E. Woods Digital Image Processing third ed. 2008 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ