A Re-Analysis of the Cochrane Library Data: The Dangers of Unobserved Heterogeneity in Meta-Analyses

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 7, 2013, Pages

  Kontopantelis, Evangelos ^a   Springate, David A ^a   Reeves, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DERSIMONIAN LAIRD METHOD; HETEROGENEITY ESTIMATION METHOD; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; PREVALENCE; PUBLICATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; VALIDITY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES AS TOPIC; LIBRARY MATERIALS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 84880850709     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069930     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, NetLibrary I (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context: London: BMJ Books.
2. DerSimonian R, Laird N, (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control ClinTrials 7: 177-188.
3. Brockwell SE, Gordon IR, (2001) A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis. StatMed 20: 825-840.
4. Kontopantelis E, Reeves D, (2012) Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 21: 409-426.
5. Biggerstaff BJ, Tweedie RL, (1997) Incorporating variability in estimates of heterogeneity in the random effects model in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 16: 753-768.
6. Follmann DA, Proschan MA, (1999) Valid inference in random effects meta-analysis. Biometrics 55: 732-737.
7. Sidik K, Jonkman JN, (2002) A simple confidence interval for meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 21: 3153-3159.
8. Hardy RJ, Thompson SG, (1996) A likelihood approach to meta-analysis with random effects. StatMed 15: 619-629.
9. Jackson D, Bowden J, Baker R, (2010) How does the DerSimonian and Laird procedure for random effects meta-analysis compare with its more efficient but harder to compute counterparts? Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140: 961-970.
10. Kontopantelis E, Reeves D (2012) Letter: Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: a comparison between DerSimonian-Laird and Restricted Maximum Likelihood. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 21.
11. Mantel N, Haenszel W, (1959) Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data from Retrospective Studies of Disease. Biometrics 15: 639-640.
12. Greenland S, Robins JM, (1985) Estimation of a Common Effect Parameter from Sparse Follow-up Data. Biometrics 41: 55-68.
13. Yusuf S, Peto R, Lewis J, Collins R, Sleight P, (1985) Beta-Blockade during and after Myocardial-Infarction- an Overview of the Randomized Trials. Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases 27: 335-371.
14. Hedges LV, (1983) A random effects model for effect sizes. Psychological Bulletin 93: 388.
15. Cochran WG, (1954) The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics 10: 101-129.
16. DerSimonian R, Kacker R, (2007) Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: An update. Contemporary Clinical Trials 28: 105-114.
17. Sidik K, Jonkman JN, (2005) Simple heterogeneity variance estimation for meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C-Applied Statistics 54: 367-384.
18. Sidik K, Jonkman JN, (2007) A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in combining results of studies. Statistics in Medicine 26: 1964-1981.
19. Rukhin AL (2012) Estimating heterogeneity variance in meta-analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology).
20. Cochran WG, (1937) Problems arising in the analysis of a series of similar experiments. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 4: 102-118.
21. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, (2002) Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. StatMed 21: 1539-1558.
22. Hardy RJ, Thompson SG, (1998) Detecting and describing heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine 17: 841-856.
23. Mittlbock M, Heinzl H, (2006) A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses. StatMed 25: 4321-4333.
24. The Nordic Cochrane Centre (2011) Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1 ed. Copenhagen: The Cochrane Collaboration.
25. Deeks JJ, Altman DG, Bradburn MJ (2008) Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta-Analysis. Systematic Reviews in Health Care: BMJ Publishing Group. 285-312.
26. Efron B, (1981) Nonparametric Estimates of Standard Error- the Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Methods. Biometrika 68: 589-599.
27. Hedges LV, (1983) A Random Effects Model for Effect Sizes. Psychological Bulletin 93: 388-395.
28. Morris CN, (1983) Parametric Empirical Bayes Inference- Theory and Applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 78: 47-55.
29. StataCorp L P. (2011) Stata Statistical software for Windows. 12.1 ed.
30. Wiley (2012) The Cochrane Library.
31. GNU General Public Licence (2012) Python(x,y).
32. Deeks JJ, Higgins JP (2010) Statistical algorithms in Review Manager 5. Statistical Methods Group of The Cochrane Collaboration. 1-11.
33. Turner RM, Davey J, Clarke MJ, Thompson SG, Higgins JPT, (2012) Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. International Journal of Epidemiology 41: 818-827.
34. Kontopantelis E, Reeves D, (2010) metaan: Random-effects meta-analysis. Stata Journal 10: 395-407.