The measurement of undesirable output based-on DEA in E&E: Models development and empirical analysis

Mathematical and Computer Modelling

Volumn 58, Issue 5-6, 2013, Pages 907-912

  Lv, Wendong ^a   Zhou, Zhixiang ^b   Huang, Hong ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY OF CHINA   (China)

^c HEFEI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84880831628     PISSN: 08957177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcm.2013.06.007     Document Type: Editorial

References (44)

1. Farrell M.J. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General) 1957, 120:253-281.
2. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making Units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
3. Zhou P., Poh K.L., Ang B.W. A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 178:1-9.
4. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Huang Z.M., Sun D.B. Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. Journal of Econometrics 1990, 46:73-91.
5. Cook W.D., Hababou M., Tuenter H. Multi-component efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2000, 14:209-224.
6. Fukuyama H., Weber W.L. Estimating output allocative efficiency and productivity change: application to Japanese banks. European Journal of Operational Research 2002, 137:177-190.
7. Drake L., Hall M. Efficiency in Japanese banking: an empirical analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance 2003, 27:891-917.
8. Barros C.P., Managi S., Matousek R. The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks: non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output. Omega 2012, 40:1-8.
9. Beasley J. Determining teaching and research efficiencies. Journal of the Operational Research Society 1995, 46:441-452.
10. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Identifying excesses and deficits in Chinese industrial productivity (1953-1990): a weighted data envelopment analysis approach. Omega 1998, 26:279-296.
11. Seiford L.M., Zhu J. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis models. INFOR 1999, 37:174-187.
12. Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking: Data Envelopment Analysis with Spreadsheets 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. Liang L.F., Yang F., Cook W.D., Zhu J. DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 145:35-49.
14. Pittman R.W. Multilateral productivity comparisons with undesirable outputs. The Economic Journal 1983, 93:883-891.
15. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K. Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1989, 71:90-98.
16. Färe R., Grosskopf S., Lovell C.A.K., Yaisawarng S. Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: a distance function approach. The Review of Economics and Statistics 1993, 75:374-380.
17. Banker R.D., Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 1984, 30:1078-1092.
18. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. An occurrence of multiple projections in DEA-based measurement of technical efficiency: theoretical comparison among DEA models from desirable properties. European Journal of Operational Research 2009, 196:764-794.
19. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale on US fossil fuel power plants: radial and non-radial approaches for DEA environmental assessment. Energy Economics 2012.
20. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance. European Journal of Operational Research 2007, 178:1-9.
21. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Golany B., Seiford L.M., Stutz J. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics 1985, 30:91-107.
22. Färe R., Lovell C.A.K. Production Frontiers 1994, Cambridge University Press.
23. P.C. Chen, M. Yu, S. Managi, C. Chang, Non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable outputs, Working Paper, 2010, Tohoku University, Jap.
24. Färe R., Lovell C.A.K. Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory 1978, 19:150-164.
25. Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 2001, 130:498-509.
26. Cooper W.W., Park K.S., Pastor J.T. RAM: a range adjusted measure of efficiency. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2001, 11:5-42.
27. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale with strong complementary slackness conditions in DEA assessment: Japanese corporate effort on environment protection. Energy Economics 2012, 34:1422-1434.
28. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Measurement of returns to scale and damages to scale for operational and environmental assessment: how to manage desirable (good) DEA-based and undesirable (bad) outputs. European Journal of Operational Research 2011, 211:76-89.
29. Hernández-Sancho F., Molinos-Senante M., Sala-Garrido R. Energy efficiency in Spanish wastewater treatment plants: a non-radial DEA approach. Science of the Total Environment 2011, 409:2693-2699.
30. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation. Energy Economics 2011, 33:292-303.
31. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Efficiency-based rank assessment for electric power industry: a combined use of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and DEA-Discriminant Analysis (DA). Energy Economics 2012, 34:634-644.
32. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale and damages to scale under natural and managerial disposability: strategy, efficiency and competitiveness of petroleum firms. Energy Economics 2012, 34:645-662.
33. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Environmental assessment by DEA radial measurement: US coal-fired power plants in ISO (Independent System Operator) and RTO (Regional Transmission Organization). Energy Economics 2012, 34:663-676.
34. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries. Energy Economics 2012, 34:686-699.
35. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA radial and non-radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: theoretical extension by strong complementary slackness conditions. Energy Economics 2012, 34:700-713.
36. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale, damages to scale, marginal rate of transformation and rate of substitution in DEA environmental assessment. Energy Economics 2012, 34:905-917.
37. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. DEA environmental assessment of coal fired power plants: methodological comparison between radial and non-radial models. Energy Economics 2012, 34:1854-1863.
38. Sueyoshi T., Goto M., Ueno T. Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies. Energy Policy 2010, 34:700-713.
39. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Should the US clean air act include CO2 emission control?: examination by data envelopment analysis. Energy Policy 2010, 38:5902-5911.
40. Tone K., Tsutsui M. Dynamic DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 2010, 38:145-156.
41. Sueyoshi T., Goto M. Returns to scale vs. damages to scale in data envelopment analysis: an impact of US clean air act on coal-fired power plants. Omega 2012.
42. Choi Y., Zhang N., Zhou P. Efficiency and abatement costs of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: a slacks-based efficiency measure. Applied Energy 2012, 98:198-208.
43. Meng F.Y., Fan L.W., Zhou P., Zhou D.Q. Measuring environmental performance in China's industrial sectors with non-radial DEA. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 2012.
44. Zhou P., Ang B.W., Poh K.L. A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research 2008, 189:1-18.