Robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy: Comparison of complications and perioperative oncological outcomes in 200 patients

BJU International

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2013, Pages

  Kader, A Karim ^a   Richards, Kyle A ^b   Krane, L Spencer ^b   Pettus, Joseph A ^c   Smith, John J ^d   Hemal, Ashok K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b WAKE FOREST BAPTIST HEALTH   (United States)

^c Urologic Clinics of North Alabama   (United States)

^d FORSYTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

bladder cancer; complications; cystectomy; laparoscopy; outcomes; robotics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLADDER CARCINOMA; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPEN RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOT ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL CYSTECTOMY; ROBOTICS; TRANSFUSION; UNITED STATES; URINARY DIVERSION;

BLADDER CANCER; COMPLICATIONS; CYSTECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; OUTCOMES; ROBOTICS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CYSTECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84880821612     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12167     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A,. Cancer statistics 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012; 62: 10-29
2. Glantz GM,. Cystectomy and urinary diversion. J Urol 1966; 96: 714-717
3. Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 666-675
4. Rosario DJ, Becker M, Anderson JB,. The changing pattern of mortality and morbidity from radical cystectomy. BJU Int 2000; 85: 427-430
5. Pagano F, Bassi P, Caletti TP, et al. Results of contemporary radical cystectomy for invasive bladder cancer: a clinicopathological study with an emphasis on the inadequacy of the tumor, nodes, and metastases classification. J Urol 1991; 145: 45-50
6. Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC, et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 164-174
7. Lawrentschuk N, Colombo R, Hakenberg OW, et al. Prevention and management of complications following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 983-1001
8. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6,336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-213
9. American Society of Anesthesiologists. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24: 111
10. Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, et al. Nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int 2003; 92: 232-236
11. Hemal AK, Abdol-Enein H, Tewari A, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy and urinary diversion in the management of bladder cancer. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 719-729
12. Richards KA, Hemal AK, Kader AK, et al. Robot assisted laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy at the time of radical rivals that of open surgery: single institution report. Urology 2010; 76: 1400-1404
13. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, et al. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 196-201
14. Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee MM, et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 274-281
15. Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, et al. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncologic efficacy. BJU Int 2007; 101: 89-93
16. Pruthi RS, Nielson ME, Nix J, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases. J Urol 2010; 183: 510-515
17. Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE, et al. Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol 2010; 184: 87-91
18. Khan MS, Elhage O, Challacombe B, et al. Analysis of early complications of robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting system. Urology 2011; 77: 357-362
19. Hayn MH, Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, et al. Defining morbidity of robot-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 213-218
20. Smith AB, Raynor M, Amling CL, et al. Multi-institutional analysis of robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative outcomes and complications in 227 patients. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012; 22: 17-21
21. Richards KA, Kader K, Pettus JA, et al. Does initial learning curve compromise outcomes for robot-assisted radical cystectomy? A critical evaluation of the first 60 cases while establishing a robotics program. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1553-1558
22. Novara G, Svatek RS, Karakiewicz PI, et al. Soft tissue surgical margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of more than 4,400 patients. J Urol 2010; 183: 2165-2170
23. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Pacelli A, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: intermediate survival results at a mean follow-up of 25 months. BJU Int 2009; 105: 1706-1709
24. Lee R, Chughtai B, Herman M, et al. Cost-analysis comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RC) vs open RC. BJU Int 2011; 108: 976-983
25. Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP,. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology 2011; 77: 621-625