Analyzing first flowering event data using survival models with space and time-varying covariates

Environmetrics

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 317-331

  Terres, Maria A ^a   Gelfand, Alan E ^a   Allen, Jenica M ^b   Silander, John A ^b  

^a Duke University   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Chill function; Complementary log log link; Gaussian process; Heat function; Hierarchical model

Indexed keywords

ACCUMULATION; COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; DATA ACQUISITION; FLOWERING; PROBABILITY; SELECTION; SURVIVAL; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; TREE; WINTER;

HACHIOJI; HONSHU; JAPAN; KANTO; TOKYO [KANTO];

EID: 84880816635     PISSN: 11804009     EISSN: 1099095X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/env.2211     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Arora R, Rowland LJ, Tanino K. 2003. Induction and release of bud dormancy in woody perennials: a science comes of age. HortScience 38: 911-921.
2. Chuine I. 2000. A unified model for budburst of trees. Journal Theoretical Biology 207: 337-347.
3. Clark JS. 2004. Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians. Ecology Letters 8: 2-14.
4. Cox DR. 1972. Regression models and life tables. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 34: 187-220.
5. Ellison AM. 2004. Bayesian inference in ecology. Ecology Letters 7: 509-520.
6. Epstein ES. 1969. A scoring system for probability forecasts of ranked categories. Journal of Applied Meteorology 8: 985-987.
7. Linkosalo T, Häkkinen R, Hänninen A. 2006. Models of the spring phenology of boreal and temperate trees: Is there something missing? Tree Physiology 26: 1165-1172.
8. Luedeling E, Zhang M, McGranahan G, Leslie C. 2009a. Validation of winter chill models using historic records of walnut phenology. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 149: 1854-1864.
9. Luedeling E, Zhang M, Luedeling V, Girvetz EH. 2009b. Sensitivity of winter chill models for fruit and nut trees to climatic changes expected in California's central valley. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 133: 23-31.
10. Menzel A, Sparks TH, Estrella N, Koch E, Aasa A, Ahas R, Alm-Kübler K, Bissolli P, Braslavská O, Briede A, Chmielewski FM, Crepinsek Z, Curnel Y, Dahl Å, Defila C, Donnelly A, Filella Y, Jatczak K, Måge F, Mestre A, Nordli Ø, Peñuelas J, Pirinen P, Remišová V, Scheifinger H, Striz M, Susnik A, van Vliet AJH, Wielgolaski FE, Zach S, Zust A. 2006. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology 12: 1969-1976.
11. Miller-Rushing AJ, Katsuki T, Primack RB, Ishii Y, Don L S, Higuchi H. 2007. Impact of global warming on a group of related species and their hybrids: cherry tree (Rosaceae) flowering at Mt. Takao, Japan. American Journal of Botany 94: 1470-1478.
12. Murphy AH. 1970. The ranked probability score and the probability score: a comparison. Monthly Weather Review 98: 917-924.
13. Nagata H, Yurugi Y. 1982. Phenological studies in woody plants (II) flowering in cherry trees. Bulletin of the Faculty of Agriculture Mie University 64: 11-20.
14. Parmesan C, Yohe G. 2003. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421: 37-42.
15. Polgar CA, Primack RB. 2011. Leaf-out phenology of temperate woody plants: from trees to ecosystems. New Phytologist 191: 926-941.
16. Primack RB, Ibanez I, Higuchi H, Lee SD, Miller-Rushing AJ, Wilson AM, Silander JA. 2009. Spatial and interspecific variability in phenological responses to warming temperatures. Biological Conservation 142: 2569-2577.
17. Schaber J, Badeck FW. 2003. Physiology-based phenology models for forest tree species in Germany. International Journal of Biometeorology 47: 193-201.