Motion-compensation techniques in neonatal and fetal MR imaging

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 34, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1124-1136

  Malamateniou, C ^a,b   Malik, S J ^a   Counsell, S J ^a   Allsop, J M ^a   McGuinness, A K ^a   Hayat, T ^a   Broadhouse, K ^a   Nunes, R G ^a,c   Ederies, A M ^a,d   Hajnal, J V ^a   Rutherford, M A ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WEST ATTICA   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^d QUEEN CHARLOTTE S AND CHELSEA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICONVULSIVE AGENT; CHLORAL HYDRATE; GLUCAGON; SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

ALGORITHM; AMNION FLUID; ARTIFACT; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CLINICAL FEATURE; FETAL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FETUS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MOTION ANALYSIS SYSTEM; NEONATAL NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROIMAGING; NEWBORN; NEWBORN ASSESSMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; REVIEW; SEDATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

ARTIFACTS; FEMALE; FETAL DISEASES; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, NEWBORN, DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOTION; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 84880812333     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3128     Document Type: Review

References (79)

1. Rutherford MA. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009;21:180-86.
2. Rutherford M, Malamateniou C, Zeka J, et al. MR imaging of the neonatal brain at 3 Tesla. Eur J Paediatr Neurol 2004;8:281-89.
3. Levine D, Hatabu H, Gaa J, et al. Fetal anatomy revealed with fast MR sequences. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:905-08.
4. Levine D, Barnes PD, Sher S, et al. Fetal fast MR imaging: reproducibility, technical quality, and conspicuity of anatomy. Radiology 1998;206:549-54.
5. Griffiths PD, Paley MN, Whitby EH. MR imaging of the fetal brain and spine: a maturing technology. Ann Acad Med Singapore 2003;32:483-89.
6. Prayer D. Fetal MR. Eur J Radiol 2006;57:171.
7. Huppi PS, Inder TE. Magnetic resonance techniques in the evaluation of the perinatal brain: recent advances and future directions. Semin Neonatol 2001;6:195-210.
8. Higgins RD, Raju T, Edwards AD, et al. Hypothermia and other treatment options for neonatal encephalopathy: an executive summary of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver NICHD workshop. J Pediatr 2011;159:851-58, e851.
9. Edwards AD, Azzopardi D, Rutherford MA. Evaluation of MR imaging to predict neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants (eprime). National Institute for Health Research Annual Report 2009 (http://www.nihr.ac.uk/files/ pdfs/400891-NIHR-AnnualReport2010-acc3.pdf). Accessed September 14, 2011.
10. Levine D. Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in fetal evaluation. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:25-38.
11. FratesMC, Kumar AJ, Benson CB, et al. Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis. Radiology 2004;232:398-404.
12. Whitby EH, Paley MN, Sprigg A, et al. Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. BJOG 2004;111:784-92.
13. Hill DL, Batchelor PG, Holden M, et al. Medical image registration. Phys Med Biol 2001;46:R1-45.
14. Bonel H, Frei KA, Raio L, et al. Prospective navigator-echo-based real-time triggering of fetal head movement for the reduction of artifacts. Eur Radiol 2008;18:822-29.
15. Hayat TT, Nihat A, Martinez-Biarge M, et al. Optimization and initial experience of a multisection balanced steady-state free precession cine sequence for the assessment of fetal behavior in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:331-38.
16. Limperopoulos C, Clouchoux C. Advancing fetal brain MRI: targets for the future. Semin Perinatol 2009;33:289-98.
17. Rutherford M, Jiang S, Allsop J, et al. MR imaging methods for assessing fetal brain development. Dev Neurobiol 2008;68:700-11.
18. Hayat T. Morphological and Functional Analysis of the Fetal Central Nervous System using Magnetic Resonance Imaging [thesis]. London, UK: Imaging Sciences Department, Imperial College; 2010.
19. Dantendorfer K, Amering M, Bankier A, et al.Astudy of the effects of patient anxiety, perceptions and equipment on motion artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15:301-06.
20. de Vries JI, Fong BF. Changes in fetal motility as a result of congenital disorders: an overview. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 29:590-99.
21. Glenn OA, Barkovich J. Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis: part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1807-14.
22. Vertinsky AT, Rubesova E, Krasnokutsky MV, et al. Performance of PROPELLER relative to standard FSE T2-weighted imaging in pediatric brain MRI. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:1038-47.
23. Chow LC. Motion correction for pediatric and MSK MRI. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on Current Concepts of Motion Correction for MRI & MRS, Kitzbuhel, Tyrol, Austria. February 24-28, 2010.
24. Arena L, Morehouse HT, Safir J. MR imaging artifacts that simulate disease: how to recognize and eliminate them. Radiographics 1995;15:1373-94.
25. Pipe J. The impact of motion on data consistency and image quality in MRI. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on Current Concepts of Motion Correction for MRI & MRS. Kitzbuhel, Tyrol, Austria. February 24-28, 2010.
26. Atkinson D. Motion compensation strategies. In: Proceeding of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Montreal, Canada. May 6-13, 2011.
27. Maclaren JR. Motion Detection and Correction in Magnetic Resonance Imaging [thesis]. Christchurch, New Zealand: University of Canterbury; 2008.
28. Schultz CL, Alfidi RJ, Nelson AD, et al. The effect of motion on twodimensional Fourier transformation magnetic resonance images. Radiology 1984;152:117-21.
29. Li T, Mirowitz SA. Fast T2-weighted MR imaging: impact of variation in pulse sequence parameters on image quality and artifacts. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:745-53.
30. Bailes DR, Gilderdale DJ, Bydder GM, et al. Respiratory ordered phase encoding (ROPE): a method for reducing respiratory motion artefacta in MR imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985;9:835-38.
31. Haacke EM, Patrick JL. Reducing motion artifacts in two-dimensional Fourier transform imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1986;4:359-76.
32. Jhooti P, Wiesmann F, Taylor AM, et al. Hybrid ordered phase encoding (HOPE): an improved approach for respiratory artifact reduction. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:968-80.
33. Lanzer P, Barta C, Botvinick EH, et al. ECG-synchronized cardiac MR imaging: method and evaluation. Radiology 1985;155:681-86.
34. Bernstein M, King K, Zhou X. Handbook of MRI Pulse Sequences. Boston: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004.
35. Chernish SM, Maglinte DD. Glucagon: common untoward reactions-review and recommendations. Radiology 1990; 177:145-46.
36. Edwards AD, Arthurs OJ. Paediatric MRI under sedation: is it necessary? What is the evidence for the alternatives? Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:1353-64.
37. Cowan FM. Sedation for magnetic sedation for magnetic resonance scanning of infants and young children. In: Whitwam, JG, McCloy RF, eds. Principles and Practice of Sedation, 2nd ed. London, UK: Blackwell Healthcare; 1998:206-13.
38. Bluemke DA, Breiter SN. Sedation procedures in MR imaging: safety, effectiveness, and nursing effect on examinations. Radiology 2000;216:645-52.
39. Bisset GS, Ball WS. Preparation, sedation, and monitoring of the pediatric patient in the magnetic resonance suite. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1991;12:376-78.
40. Rutherford MA. MRI of the Neonatal Brain. London: WB Saunders; 2002:17-21.
41. Merchant N, Groves A, Larkman DJ, et al. A patient care system for early 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging of very low birth weight infants. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:779-83.
42. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: a fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:823-33.
43. Mansfield P. Multi-planar image-formation using NMR spin echoes. J Phys C Solid State Phys 1977;10:L55-L58.
44. Jiang S, Xue H, Glover A, et al. MRI of moving subjects using multislice snapshot images with volume reconstruction (SVR): application to fetal, neonatal, and adult brain studies. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007;26:967-80.
45. Chen Q, Levine D. Fast fetal magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2001;12:67-79.
46. Frahm J, Haase A, Matthaei D. Rapid NMR imaging of dynamic processes using the FLASH technique. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:321-27.
47. Nitz WR. Fast and ultrafast non-echo-planar MR imaging techniques. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2866-82.
48. Malamateniou C, McGuinness AK, Allsop JM, et al. Snapshot inversion recovery: an optimized single-shot T1-weighted inversion-recovery sequence for improved fetal brain anatomic delineation. Radiology 2011;258:229-35.
49. Graumann R, Fischer H, Oppelt A. A new pulse sequence for determining T1 and T2 simultaneously. Med Phys 1986;13:644-47.
50. Duerk JL, Lewin JS, Wendt M, et al. Remember true FISP? A high SNR, near 1-second imaging method for T2-like contrast in interventional MRI at. 2 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:203-08.
51. Sodickson DK, Manning WJ. Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:591-603.
52. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:952-62.
53. Margosian P, Schmitt F, Purdy D. Faster MR imaging: imaging with half the data. Health Care Instrum 1986:37;93-102.
54. McRobbie D, Moore E, Graves M, et al. MRI from Picture to Proton. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
55. Hennig J. K-space sampling strategies. Eur Radiol 1999;9:1020-31.
56. Pipe JG. Motion correction with PROPELLER MRI: application to head motion and free-breathing cardiac imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:963-69.
57. Larkman DJ, Atkinson D, Hajnal JV. Artifact reduction using parallel imaging methods. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004;15:267-75.
58. Delfaut EM, Beltran J, Johnson G, et al. Fat suppression in MR imaging: techniques and pitfalls. Radiographics 1999;19:373-82.
59. Stadler A, Schima W, Ba-Ssalamah A, et al. Artifacts in body MR imaging: their appearance and how to eliminate them. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1242-55.
60. Speck O. Prospective motion correction. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Workshop on Current Concepts of Motion Correction for MRI & MRS. Kitzbuhel, Tyrol, Austria. February 24-28, 2010.
61. Ehman RL, Felmlee JP. Adaptive technique for high-definition MR imaging of moving structures. Radiology 1989;173:255-63.
62. Wang Y, Riederer SJ, Ehman RL. Respiratory motion of the heart: kinematics and the implications for the spatial resolution in coronary imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;33:713-19.
63. Fu ZW, Wang Y, Grimm RC, et al. Orbital navigator echoes for motion measurements in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:746-53.
64. Welch EB, Manduca A, Grimm RC, et al. Spherical navigator echoes for full 3D rigid body motion measurement in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:32-41.
65. van der Kouwe AJ, Benner T, Dale AM. Real-time rigid body motion correction and shimming using cloverleaf navigators. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:1019-32.
66. Klessen C, Asbach P, Kroencke TJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:576-82.
67. Barnwell JD, Smith JK, Castillo M. Utility of navigator-prospective acquisition correction technique (PACE) for reducing motion in brain MR imaging studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:790-91.
68. Glover GH, Pauly JM. Projection reconstruction techniques for reduction of motion effects in MRI. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:275-89.
69. Forbes KP, Pipe JG, Karis JP, et al. Brain imaging in the unsedated pediatric patient: comparison of periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction and single-shot fast spin-echo sequences. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:794-98.
70. Zaitsev M, Dold C, Sakas G, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system. Neuroimage 2006;31:1038-50.
71. White N, Roddey C, Shankaranarayanan A, et al. PROMO: real-time prospective motion correction in MRI using image-based tracking. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:91-105.
72. Brown TT, Kuperman JM, Erhart M, et al. Prospective motion correction of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data in children. Neuroimage 2010;53:139-45.
73. Kuperman JM, Brown TT, Ahmadi ME, et al. Prospective motion correction improves diagnostic utility of pediatric MRI scans. Pediatr Radiol 2011;41:1578-82.
74. Hedley M, Yan H. Motion artifact suppression: a review of postprocessing techniques. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:627-35.
75. Rousseau F, Glenn OA, Iordanova B, et al. Registration-based approach for reconstruction of high-resolution in utero fetal MR brain images. Acad Radiol 2006;13:1072-81.
76. Gholipour A, Estroff JA, Warfield SK. Robust super-resolution volume reconstruction from slice acquisitions: application to fetal brain MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2010;29:1739-58.
77. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:1182-95.
78. Vasanawala SS, Alley MT, Hargreaves BA, et al. Improved pediatric MR imaging with compressed sensing. Radiology 2010;256:607-16.
79. Malamateniou C, Counsell SJ, Allsop JM, et al. The effect of preterm birth on neonatal cerebral vasculature studied with magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla. Neuroimage 2006;32:1050-59.