Policy implications of trends in Turkey's meat sector with respect to 2023 vision

Meat Science

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 798-804

  Yavuz, Fahri ^a   Bilgic, Abdulbaki ^a   Terin, Mustafa ^a   Guler, Irfan O ^a  

^a ATATÜRK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

2023 vision; Economic policy; Forecasting; Meat industry; Time series; Turkey

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL TIME SERIES; CONSUMPTION LEVELS; ECONOMIC GROWTH RATE; ECONOMIC POLICIES; MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS; MEAT INDUSTRY; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; TURKEY;

DIGITAL STORAGE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; FORECASTING; MEATS; TIME SERIES;

PUBLIC POLICY;

2023 VISION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ECONOMIC POLICY; ECONOMICS; FOOD INDUSTRY; FORECASTING; MANAGEMENT; MEAT; MEAT INDUSTRY; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TURKEY; TURKEY (REPUBLIC); TRENDS;

2023 VISION; ECONOMIC POLICY; FORECASTING; MEAT INDUSTRY; TIME SERIES; TURKEY;

ANIMALS; FOOD INDUSTRY; FORECASTING; MEAT; POLICY MAKING; TURKEY;

EID: 84880808019     PISSN: 03091740     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.03.024     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bilgic, A., & Yen, S. T. (in press). Demand for Meat and Dairy Products by Turkish Households: A Bayesian Censored System Approach. Agricultural Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/agec.12019.
2. Clark J.S., Klein K.K. Nerlovian acreage response as an error correction model: an application to Western Canadian agriculture. Empirical Economics 1996, 21:501-512.
3. Dickey D.A., Fuller W.A. Distributions of the estimators for autoregressive time series with unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979, 74:427-431.
4. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Cointegration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 1987, 55:251-276.
5. FAO http://faostat.fao.org/site/604/default.aspx#ancor.
6. Hallam D., Zanoli R. Error correction models and agricultural supply response. European Review of Agricultural Economics 1992, 2:111-120.
7. Hill R.C., Griffiths W.E., Lim G.C. Principles of econometrics 2011, January 4th, Wiley. 4th edition.
8. Ocran M.K., Biekpe N. Agricultural commodity supply response in Ghana. Journal of economic studies 2008, July, vol. 35(3):224-235. Emerald Group Publishing.
9. Perron P. The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 1989, 57(6):1361-1401.
10. Turkish Statistical Institute http://www.tuik.gov.tr/AltKategori.do?ust_id=13.
11. USDA Turkey: 2010 Turkey Livestock Products. Global Agricultural Information Network (GAIN) Report 2010, (http://gain.fas.usda.gov/../2010%20Turkey%20Livestock%20Products%2).
12. Wooldridge J.M. Introductory econometrics: A modern approach 2009, Southwestern, Canada. Second edition.
13. Yavuz F. A new method trial to estimate the production of red meat in Turkey. II. Symposium of Statistics Research, November 27-29, Ankara, Turkey 2000.
14. Yavuz F., Erturk Y.E., Tan S., Gul U., Taskaya B., Demir A., Yurukcu A. Custom union free trade agreements and meat import 2004, Agricultural Economics Research İnstitute Publications, Ankara.
15. Yavuz F., Keskin A., Aksoy A. A comparative analysis of Turkey's red meat statistics and related research results. 15. Statistical Research Symposium 2006, 11-12 May, Ankara 2006.
16. Yavuz F., Zulauf C.R. Introducing a new approach to estimating red meat production in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2004, (2004/4).