MAGNAMOSIS IV: Magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive colorectal surgery

Endoscopy

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 643-648

  Wall, J ^a,b   Diana, M ^a   Leroy, J ^a   Deruijter, V ^a   Gonzales, K D ^c   Lindner, V ^d   Harrison, M ^c   Marescaux, J ^a  

^a IRCAD   (France)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE MULHOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; END TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; FIBROSIS; HISTOLOGY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INFLAMMATION; MAGNETIC COMPRESSION ANASTOMOSIS; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIDE TO SIDE ANASTOMOSIS; SURGICAL STAPLING; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; COLON; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; MAGNETS; MALE; NATURAL ORIFICE ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; OPERATIVE TIME; PRESSURE; RECTUM; SURGICAL STAPLING; SWINE;

EID: 84880789017     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1344119     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Aggarwal R., Darzi A. Compression anastomoses revisited. J Am Coll Surg: 2005; 201 965 971
2. Kopelman D., Hatoum O. A., Kimmel B. et al. Compression gastrointestinal anastomosis. Expert Rev Med Devices: 2007; 4 821 828
3. Hardy K. J. Non-suture anastomosis: the historical development. Aust N Z J Surg: 1990; 60 625 633
4. Senn N. Enterorrhaphy; its history, technique, and present status. JAMA: 1893; 21 215 235
5. Mokros W. [The indications for the Valtrac-ring - Report on 1015 Anastomoses]. Zentralbl Chir: 2001; 126 1005 1008
6. Cahill C. J., Betzler M., Gruwez J. A. et al. Sutureless large bowel anastomosis: European experience with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Br J Surg: 1989; 76 344 347
7. Forde K. A., Goodell K. H., DellaBadia M. A 10-year single-institutional study of the biofragmentable anastomosis ring. Am J Surg: 2006; 191 483 487; discussion 488
8. Bundy C. A., Zera R. T., Onstad G. A. et al. Comparative surgical and colonoscopic appearance of colon anastomoses constructed with sutures, staples, and the biofragmentable anastomotic ring. Surg Endosc: 1992; 6 18 22
9. Galizia G., Lieto E., Castellano P. et al. Comparison between the biofragmentable anastomosis ring and stapled anastomoses in the extraperitoneal rectum: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis: 1999; 14 286 290
10. Polglase A. L., Skinner S. A., Johnson W. R. Laparoscopic assisted right hemicolectomy with Valtrac BAR (Biofragmentable Anastomotic Ring) ileotransverse anastomosis. Aust N Z J Surg: 1993; 63 481 484
11. Gullichsen R., Ovaska J., Havia T. et al. What happens to the Valtrac anastomosis of the colon? A follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum: 1993; 36 362 365
12. Corman M. L., Prager E. D., Hardy T. G. Jr et al. Comparison of the Valtrac biofragmentable anastomosis ring with conventional suture and stapled anastomosis in colon surgery. Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum: 1989; 32 183 187
13. Kim S. H., Choi H. J., Park K. J. et al. Sutureless intestinal anastomosis with the biofragmentable anastomosis ring: experience of 632 anastomoses in a single institute. Dis Colon Rectum: 2005; 48 2127 2132
14. Jansen A., Keeman J. N., Davies G. A. et al. Early experiences with magnetic rings in resection of the distal colon. Neth J Surg: 1980; 32 20 27
15. Jansen A., Brummelkamp W. H., Davies G. A. et al. Clinical applications of magnetic rings in colorectal anastomosis. Surg Gynecol Obstet: 1981; 153 537 545
16. Jamshidi R., Stephenson J. T., Clay J. G. et al. Magnamosis: magnetic compression anastomosis with comparison to suture and staple techniques. J Pediatr Surg: 2009; 44 222 228
17. Pichakron K. O., Jelin E. B., Hirose S. et al. Magnamosis II: magnetic compression anastomosis for minimally invasive gastrojejunostomy and jejunojejunostomy. J Am Coll Surg: 2011; 212 42 49
18. Gonzales K. D., Douglas G., Pichakron K. O. et al. Magnamosis III: delivery of a magnetic compression anastomosis device using minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. J Pediatr Surg: 2012; 47 1291 1295
19. Diana M., Wall J., Perretta S. et al. Totally endoscopic magnetic enteral bypass by external guided rendez-vous technique. Surg Innov: 2011; 18 317 320
20. Leroy J., Perretta S., Diana M. et al. An original endoluminal magnetic anastomotic device allowing pure NOTES transgastric and transrectal sigmoidectomy in a porcine model: proof of concept. Surg Innov: 2012; 19 109 116
21. Rattner D., Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery. October 2005. Surg Endosc: 2006; 20 329 333
22. Leroy J., Costantino F., Cahill R. A. et al. Fully laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis involving percutaneous endoluminal colonic anvil control (PECAC). Surg Innov: 2010; 17 79 84
23. Perretta S., Wall J. K., Dallemagne B. et al. Two novel endoscopic esophageal lengthening and reconstruction techniques. Surg Endosc: 2011; 25 3440
24. Diana M., Leroy J., Wall J. et al. Prospective experimental study of transrectal viscerotomy closure using transanal endoscopic suture vs. circular stapler: a step toward NOTES. Endoscopy: 2012; 44 605 611