Prospective experimental study of transrectal viscerotomy closure using transanal endoscopic suture vscircular stapler: A step toward NOTES

Endoscopy

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 605-611

  Diana, M ^a   Leroy, J ^a   Wall, J ^a   De Ruijter, V ^a   Lindner, V ^b   Dhumane, P ^a   Mutter, D ^a   Marescaux, J ^a  

^a IRCAD   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE MULHOUSE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS HEMORRHOID AND PROLAPSE STAPLER; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROTOMY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; NONHUMAN; OPERATION DURATION; PERITONEAL FLUID; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM SURGERY; STAPLER; STENOSIS; SWINE; TIME; TRANSANAL ENDOSCOPIC OPERATION PLATFORM; TRANSRECTAL NATURAL ORIFICE TRANSLUMINAL ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; WOUND CLOSURE;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; ASCITIC FLUID; COLECTOMY; FEMALE; MALE; NATURAL ORIFICE ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; PROCTITIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTUM; SURGICAL STAPLERS; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SWINE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84861409691     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1308911     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. McGee MF, Rosen MJ, Marks J et al. A primer on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: building a new paradigm. Surg Innov: 2006; 13 86 93
2. Rattner D, Kalloo A. ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery Surg Endosc: 2006; 20 329 333
3. Ramwell A, Evans J, Bignell M et al. The creation of a peritoneal defect in transanal endoscopic microsurgery does not increase complications. Colorectal Dis: 2009; 11 964 966
4. Demartines N, von Flue MO, Harder FH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results. World J Surg: 2001; 25 870 875
5. Mathews JC, Chin MS, Fernandez-Esparrach G et al. Early healing of transcolonic and transgastric natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery access sites. J Am Coll Surg 210 480 490
6. Pai RD, Fong DG, Bundga ME et al. Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model (with video). Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 64 428 434
7. Wilhelm D, Meining A, von Delius S et al. An innovative, safe and sterile sigmoid access (ISSA) for NOTES. Endoscopy: 2007; 39 401 406
8. Leroy J, Diana M, Perretta S et al. Original technique to close the transrectal viscerotomy access in a NOTES transrectal and transgastric segmental colectomy. Surg Innovation: 2011; 18 193 200
9. Leroy J, Costantino F, Cahill RA et al. Fully laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis involving percutaneous endoluminal colonic anvil control (PECAC). Surg Innov: 2010; 17 79 84
10. Yau K. Transanal endoscopic operation (TEO). The Hong Kong Medical Diary: 2009; 14 13 16
11. Buess G, Theiss R, Gunther M et al. Endoscopic surgery in the rectum. Endoscopy: 1985; 17 31 35
12. Whiteford MH, Denk PM, Swanstrom LL. Feasibility of radical sigmoid colectomy performed as natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) using transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc: 2007; 21 1870 1874
13. Sylla P, Willingham FF, Sohn DK et al. NOTES rectosigmoid resection using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) with transgastric endoscopic assistance: a pilot study in swine. J Gastrointest Surg: 2008; 12 1717 1723
14. Trunzo JA, Delaney CP. Natural orifice proctectomy using a transanal endoscopic microsurgical technique in a porcine model. Surg Innov 17 48 52
15. Fajardo AD, Hunt SR, Fleshman JW et al. Video. Transanal single-port low anterior resection in a cadaver model. Surg Endosc: 2010; 24 1765
16. Leroy J, Cahill RA, Asakuma M et al. Single-access laparoscopic sigmoidectomy as definitive surgical management of prior diverticulitis in a human patient. Arch Surg: 2009; 144 173 179
17. Saito Y, Sakamoto T, Fukunaga S et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal tumors. Dig Endosc: 2009; 21 Suppl 1 7 12
18. Fujishiro M. Perspective on the practical indications of endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. World J Gastroenterol: 2008; 14 4289 4295
19. Yoshida N, Yagi N, Naito Y et al. Safe procedure in endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors focused on preventing complications. World J Gastroenterol: 2010; 16 1688 1695
20. Ballantyne GH, Burke JB, Rogers G et al. Accelerated wound healing with stapled enteric suture lines. An experimental study comparing traditional sewing techniques and a stapling device. Ann Surg: 1985; 201 360 364
21. Graffner H, Andersson L, Lowenhielm P et al. The healing process of anastomoses of the colon. A comparative study using single, double-layer or stapled anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum: 1984; 27 767 771
22. Buchmann P, Schneider K, Gebbers JO. Fibrosis of experimental colonic anastomosis in dogs after EEA stapling or suturing. Dis Colon Rectum: 1983; 26 217 220
23. Jansson OK, Zilling TL, Walther BS. Healing of colonic anastomoses: comparative experimental study of glued, manually sutured, and stapled anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum: 1991; 34 557 562
24. Durdey P, Bucknall TE. Assessment of sutures for use in colonic surgery: an experimental study. J R Soc Med: 1984; 77 472 477