Effect of CO2 inhibition on biogenic isoprene emission: Implications for air quality under 2000 to 2050 changes in climate, vegetation, and land use

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 40, Issue 13, 2013, Pages 3479-3483

  Tai, Amos P K ^a   Mickley, Loretta J ^b   Heald, Colette L ^a   Wu, Shiliang ^c  

^a Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

carbon dioxide; climate change; isoprene; land cover change; ozone; secondary organic aerosol

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EMISSIONS; COUPLED MODELING; HUMAN LAND USE; ISOPRENE EMISSION; LAND-COVER CHANGE; LAND-USE CHANGE; NATURAL VEGETATION; SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOLS;

AEROSOLS; AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION; CLIMATE CHANGE; ISOPRENE; LAND USE; OZONE; VEGETATION;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY; BIOGENIC EMISSION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; INHIBITION; ISOPRENE; LAND COVER; LAND USE CHANGE; OZONE; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY; VEGETATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 84880784992     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: 19448007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/grl.50650     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Fiore, A. M., H. Levy, and, D. A. Jaffe, (2011), North American isoprene influence on intercontinental ozone pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11 (4), 1697-1710, doi: 10.5194/Acp-11-1697-2011.
2. Fiore, A. M., et al. (2012), Global air quality and climate, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41 (19), 6663-6683, doi: 10.1039/C2cs35095e.
3. Guenther, A., X. Jiang, C. L. Heald, T. Sakulyanontvittaya, T. Duhl, L. K. Emmons, and, X. Wang, (2012), The Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature version 2.1 (MEGAN2.1): An extended and updated framework for modeling biogenic emissions, Geosci. Model Dev., 5 (6), 1471-1492, doi: 10.5194/Gmd-5-1471-2012.
4. 2 changes and implications for global budgets, Global Change Biol., 15 (5), 1127-1140, doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2008.01802.X.
5. Henze, D. K., J. H. Seinfeld, N. L. Ng, J. H. Kroll, T. M. Fu, D. J. Jacob, and, C. L. Heald, (2008), Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbons: High- vs. low-yield pathways, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8 (9), 2405-2420.
6. Hofzumahaus, A., et al. (2009), Amplified trace gas removal in the troposphere, Science, 324 (5935), 1702-1704, doi: 10.1126/Science.1164566.
7. Jacob, D. J., and, D. A. Winner, (2009), Effect of climate change on air quality, Atmos. Environ., 43 (1), 51-63.
8. John, J. G., A. M. Fiore, V. Naik, L. W. Horowitz, and, J. P. Dunne, (2012), Climate versus emission drivers of methane lifetime against loss by tropospheric OH from 1860-2100, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12 (24), 12,021-12,036, doi: 10.5194/Acp-12-12021-2012.
9. Nakicenovic, N., and, R. Swart, (2000), Special Report on Emissions Scenarios: A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, pp. 599.
10. Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NEAA) (2006), Integrated Modeling of Global Environmental Change, An Overview of IMAGE 2.4, Bilthoven, Netherlands.
11. 2 concentrations, Global Change Biol., 17 (4), 1595-1610, doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2010.02306.X.
12. 2 environment, Plant Cell Environ., 27 (4), 381-391, doi: 10.1111/J.1365-3040.2003.01151.X.
13. Rind, D., J. Lerner, J. Jonas, and, C. McLinden, (2007), Effects of resolution and model physics on tracer transports in the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies general circulation models, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09315, doi: 10.1029/2006jd007476.
14. 2 uncouples growth from isoprene emission in an agriforest ecosystem, Nature, 421 (6920), 256-259, doi: 10.1038/Nature01312.
15. Sillman, S., J. A. Logan, and, S. C. Wofsy, (1990), The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen-oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes, J. Geophys. Res., 95 (D2), 1837-1851, doi: 10.1029/Jd095id02p01837.
16. Sitch, S., et al. (2003), Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model, Global Change Biol., 9 (2), 161-185, doi: 10.1046/J.1365-2486.2003.00569. X.
17. Weaver, C. P., et al. (2009), A preliminary synthesis of modeled climate change impacts on US regional ozone concentrations, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90 (12), 1843-1863.
18. 2 concentration, Global Change Biol., 15 (5), 1189-1200, doi: 10.1111/J.1365-2486.2008.01803.X.
19. Wu, S., L. J. Mickley, J. O. Kaplan, and, D. J. Jacob, (2012), Impacts of changes in land use and land cover on atmospheric chemistry and air quality over the 21st century, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12 (3), 1597-1609, doi: 10.5194/Acp-12-1597-2012.
20. 2 inhibition of terrestrial isoprene emission significantly affects future ozone projections, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9 (8), 2793-2803.